Patriot News Network

Call your elected officials.

2012-01-18T05:54:00.000-08:00

Tell them you are their constituent, and you oppose SOPA and PIPA.

Why?

SOPA and PIPA put the burden on website owners to police user-contributed material and call for the unnecessary blocking of entire sites. Small sites won't have sufficient resources to defend themselves. Big media companies may seek to cut off funding sources for their foreign competitors, even if copyright isn't being infringed. Foreign sites will be blacklisted, which means they won't show up in major search engines. SOPA and PIPA build a framework for future restrictions and suppression.

In a world in which politicians regulate the Internet based on the influence of big money, PNN — and sites like it — cannot survive.

Congress says it's trying to protect the rights of copyright owners, but the "cure" that SOPA and PIPA represent is worse than the disease. SOPA and PIPA are not the answer: they will fatally damage the free and open Internet.

http://sopafraud.blogspot.com/

Not only are soy products not good for you—they’re wrecking endocrine health.

2012-01-16T12:02:00.001-08:00

Greensmoothiegirl
January 16, 2012

As more and more data has emerged in recent years about the dangers of eating a diet rich in animal products, soy product offerings have exploded at health food and other grocery stores as an alternative “wonder food.” They include soy protein powders and bars and meat replacements (hot dogs, burger patties, and more). But soy products are in virtually every bread, cereal, boxed, canned, or processed food in the modern world.

America’s soybean growers have hit the motherlode and now sell waste products of the soybean as “soy isolate protein powder”: this food is refined, processed, and separated from the whole food. Even the whole food is problematic, because the isolates are so ubiquitous that adding any more to the diet seems unwise unless you have completely opted out of all boxed, canned, prepackaged foods.

We have been told the Japanese have lower rates of breast, uterus, and prostate cancer, and that is attributed to high soy consumption. Unfortunately, Japanese people (and Asians) have higher rates of esophageal, pancreatic, liver, and stomach cancers. Soy causes these cancers in lab animals. Also, the Japanese tend to eat fermented whole-soy products such as miso, tempeh, and tofu-not refined products made from soy oil and isolated proteins.

The isoflavones in soy cause toxicity in estrogen-sensitive tissues and depress thyroid function, causing decreased metabolism as well as other thyroid diseases. Soy products now in virtually everything at the grocery store (breads, spaghetti sauce, cookies, even canned tuna) contribute to the epidemic of both diagnosed—and an estimated 10 million undiagnosed—thyroid problems. Most thyroid problems are in women over 40, and soy’s thyroid-depressing effects are likely contributing to the rise in obesity.

Soy lowers testosterone levels in men and causes malnutrition, especially in babies and children drinking soy milk or soy formula. Dozens of studies show that soy causes reproductive problems, immune problems, and cognitive decline. Doctors and researchers including Andrew Weil, Mary Enig, Kaayla T. Daniel, FDA advisors, and many others caution against soy consumption.

Fact: Soy is not a good alternative to meat and should be avoided because it promotes disease. Of particular concern are soy formulas for babies, soy protein powders and bars, soy-based hormone creams for women, and anything that features “soy isolate protein powder” or other non-fermented, refined products. The danger of soy product is coming to light, but many operate under the assumption that it is a nutritious food, especially for protein.

Air Force dumped ashes of more troops’ remains in Va. landfill than acknowledged

2011-12-10T06:57:00.001-08:00

Washington Post
December 10, 2011

The Air Force dumped the incinerated partial remains of at least 274 American troops in a Virginia landfill, far more than the military had acknowledged, before halting the secretive practice three years ago, records show.

The landfill dumping was concealed from families who had authorized the military to dispose of the remains in a dignified and respectful manner, Air Force officials said. There are no plans, they said, to alert those families now.

The Air Force had maintained that it could not estimate how many troops might have had their remains sent to a landfill. The practice was revealed last month by The Washington Post, which was able to document a single case of a soldier whose partial remains were sent to the King George County landfill in Virginia. The new data, for the first time, show the scope of what has become an embarrassing episode for vaunted Dover Air Base, the main port of entry for America’s war dead.

The landfill disposals were never formally authorized under military policies or regulations. They also were not disclosed to senior Pentagon officials who conducted a high-level review of cremation policies at the Dover mortuary in 2008, records show.

Air Force and Pentagon officials said last month that determining how many remains went to the landfill would require searching through the records of more than 6,300 troops whose remains have passed through the mortuary since 2001.

“It would require a massive effort and time to recall records and research individually,” Jo Ann Rooney, the Pentagon’s acting undersecretary for personnel, wrote in a Nov. 22 letter to Rep. Rush D. Holt (D-N.J.).

Holt, who has pressed the Pentagon for answers on behalf of a constituent whose husband was killed in Iraq, accused the Air Force and Defense Department of hiding the truth.

“What the hell?” Holt said in a phone interview. “We spent millions, tens of millions, to find any trace of soldiers killed, and they’re concerned about a ‘massive’ effort to go back and pull out the files and find out how many soldiers were disrespected this way?” He added: “They just don’t want to ask questions or look very hard.”

Senior Air Force leaders said there was no intent to deceive. “Absolutely not,” said Lt. Gen. Darrell D. Jones, the Air Force’s deputy chief of staff for personnel.

This week, after The Post pressed for information contained in the Dover mortuary’s electronic database, the Air Force produced a tally based on those records. It showed that 976 fragments from 274 military personnel were cremated, incinerated and taken to the landfill between 2004 and 2008.

An additional group of 1,762 unidentified remains were collected from the battlefield and disposed of in the same manner, the Air Force said. Those fragments could not undergo DNA testing because they had been badly burned or damaged in explosions. The total number of incinerated fragments dumped in the landfill exceeded 2,700.

A separate federal investigation of the mortuary last month, prompted by whistleblower complaints, uncovered “gross mismanagement” and documented how body parts recovered from bomb blasts stacked up in the morgue’s coolers for months or years before they were identified and disposed of.

The problems also transpired at a time when the mortuary was shielded from public scrutiny. News coverage of the return of fallen troops to Dover was banned by President George H.W. Bush in 1991 before the first Persian Gulf War. The ban remained until April 2009, when the Obama administration lifted it.

The Air Force said it first cremated the remains and then included those ashes in larger loads of mortuary medical waste that were burned in an incinerator and taken to a landfill. Incinerating medical waste is a common disposal practice but including cremated human ashes is not, according to funeral home directors, regulators and waste haulers.

Air Force officials said they do not know when the landfill disposals began. They said their first record of it is Feb. 23, 2004. The mortuary database became operational in late 2003.

The Air Force said mortuary leaders decided to end the practice in May 2008 because “there was a better way to do it,” Jones said. The military now cremates unclaimed and unidentified body parts and buries the ashes at sea.

Jones said the Air Force did not need to inform relatives of troops whose remains ended up in the landfill because they had signed forms stipulating that they did not wish to be notified if additional remains were identified. The forms authorized the military to make “appropriate disposition” of those subsequent remains.

Asked if the landfill was a dignified final resting place, Jones said: “The way we’re doing it today is much better.”

Gari-Lynn Smith, the widow of an Army sergeant killed in Iraq, said she received an e-mail in July from Trevor Dean, the mortuary director, saying that incinerated remains had been taken to landfills at least since he began working at Dover in 1996. Dean is one of the officials facing discipline for his role in the reported mismanagement at the mortuary.

Smith’s husband, Sgt. 1st Class Scott R. Smith, a member of a bomb-disposal unit, was killed on July 17, 2006. In 2007, she began asking the military what happened to some of his remains that were identified after his funeral.

After four years of letters, phone calls and records requests, she received a letter from the mortuary in April stating that the military cremated and incinerated those partial remains and disposed of them in the King George landfill.

“I hope this information brings some comfort to you during your time of loss,” read the letter, signed by Dean.

Smith was infuriated. “They have known that they were doing something disgusting, and they were doing everything they could to keep it from us,” she said in a phone interview.

In May 2008, then-Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates ordered a detailed review of policies at Dover after an Army officer complained that the mortuary had cremated a fallen comrade at a nearby funeral home that also cremated pets in a separate chamber.

The review team ordered changes, emphasizing the need to ensure the highest levels of dignity and honor.

The Pentagon would not release the report, which was overseen by David Chu, who was undersecretary of defense for personnel. A copy obtained by The Post, however, shows that the landfill disposal practice was never reviewed or mentioned. Chu, now president of the Institute for Defense Analyses in Alexandria, declined to comment.

Private contractors hired by the Air Force to handle the remains’ incineration and disposal of the residue said they were unaware that they were transporting the ashes of dead troops. Records show that the Air Force hired the contractors to dispose of medical waste and did not specify that cremated body parts were included.

MedTrace Inc. of North East, Md., had Air Force disposal contracts between 2004 and 2007, records show. Don Holland, a manager for the company, said his employees picked up boxes of sealed containers from the Dover mortuary.

“They were certified as medical waste that had been properly treated — that’s it,” Holland said. “We don’t go looking at what’s in there. It’s sealed.”

MedTrace took the items to an incinerator in Baltimore, according to state records in Delaware, where the mortuary is located. Holland declined to discuss the incineration and which landfill his company used.

Lisa Kardell, a spokeswoman for Waste Management, which operates the King George landfill, said the firm has no record of a contract with MedTrace for the years 2003 through 2008.

She said that Air Force officials have not returned calls over the past two weeks from her company’s attorneys, asking which haulers would have been handling the Dover materials and the disposition of the ashes.

“Obviously, we would be opposed to taking cremated remains of our servicemen and servicewomen and putting them in our landfill,” Kardell said. “But it sounds like a lot of us were pulled in unknowingly to this unfortunate situation with the Air Force,” she added.

“It’s a moral thing,” said Jeff Jenkins, the manager of the King George landfill. “Someone killed overseas fighting for our country, I wouldn’t want them buried — any part of them — in the landfill.”

Documents: ATF used "Fast and Furious" to make the case for gun regulations

2011-12-10T06:55:00.000-08:00

CBS
December 10, 2011

Documents obtained by CBS News show that the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) discussed using their covert operation "Fast and Furious" to argue for controversial new rules about gun sales. PICTURES: ATF "Gunwalking" scandal timeline

In Fast and Furious, ATF secretly encouraged gun dealers to sell to suspected traffickers for Mexican drug cartels to go after the "big fish." But ATF whistleblowers told CBS News and Congress it was a dangerous practice called "gunwalking," and it put thousands of weapons on the street. Many were used in violent crimes in Mexico. Two were found at the murder scene of a U.S. Border Patrol agent.

ATF officials didn't intend to publicly disclose their own role in letting Mexican cartels obtain the weapons, but emails show they discussed using the sales, including sales encouraged by ATF, to justify a new gun regulation called "Demand Letter 3". That would require some U.S. gun shops to report the sale of multiple rifles or "long guns." Demand Letter 3 was so named because it would be the third ATF program demanding gun dealers report tracing information.

On July 14, 2010 after ATF headquarters in Washington D.C. received an update on Fast and Furious, ATF Field Ops Assistant Director Mark Chait emailed Bill Newell, ATF's Phoenix Special Agent in Charge of Fast and Furious:

"Bill - can you see if these guns were all purchased from the same (licensed gun dealer) and at one time. We are looking at anecdotal cases to support a demand letter on long gun multiple sales. Thanks."

More Fast and Furious coverage:
Memos contradict Holder on Fast and Furious
Agent: I was ordered to let guns "walk" into Mexico
Gunwalking scandal uncovered at ATF

On Jan. 4, 2011, as ATF prepared a press conference to announce arrests in Fast and Furious, Newell saw it as "(A)nother time to address Multiple Sale on Long Guns issue." And a day after the press conference, Chait emailed Newell: "Bill--well done yesterday... (I)n light of our request for Demand letter 3, this case could be a strong supporting factor if we can determine how many multiple sales of long guns occurred during the course of this case."

This revelation angers gun rights advocates. Larry Keane, a spokesman for National Shooting Sports Foundation, a gun industry trade group, calls the discussion of Fast and Furious to argue for Demand Letter 3 "disappointing and ironic." Keane says it's "deeply troubling" if sales made by gun dealers "voluntarily cooperating with ATF's flawed 'Operation Fast & Furious' were going to be used by some individuals within ATF to justify imposing a multiple sales reporting requirement for rifles."

The Gun Dealers' Quandary

Several gun dealers who cooperated with ATF told CBS News and Congressional investigators they only went through with suspicious sales because ATF asked them to.

Sometimes it was against the gun dealer's own best judgment.

Read the email

In April, 2010 a licensed gun dealer cooperating with ATF was increasingly concerned about selling so many guns. "We just want to make sure we are cooperating with ATF and that we are not viewed as selling to the bad guys," writes the gun dealer to ATF Phoenix officials, "(W)e were hoping to put together something like a letter of understanding to alleviate concerns of some type of recourse against us down the road for selling these items."

Read the email

ATF's group supervisor on Fast and Furious David Voth assures the gun dealer there's nothing to worry about. "We (ATF) are continually monitoring these suspects using a variety of investigative techniques which I cannot go into detail."

Two months later, the same gun dealer grew more agitated.

"I wanted to make sure that none of the firearms that were sold per our conversation with you and various ATF agents could or would ever end up south of the border or in the hands of the bad guys. I guess I am looking for a bit of reassurance that the guns are not getting south or in the wrong hands...I want to help ATF with its investigation but not at the risk of agents (sic) safety because I have some very close friends that are US Border Patrol agents in southern AZ as well as my concern for all the agents (sic) safety that protect our country."

"It's like ATF created or added to the problem so they could be the solution to it and pat themselves on the back," says one law enforcement source familiar with the facts. "It's a circular way of thinking."

The Justice Department and ATF declined to comment. ATF officials mentioned in this report did not respond to requests from CBS News to speak with them.

The "Demand Letter 3" Debate

The two sides in the gun debate have long clashed over whether gun dealers should have to report multiple rifle sales. On one side, ATF officials argue that a large number of semi-automatic, high-caliber rifles from the U.S. are being used by violent cartels in Mexico. They believe more reporting requirements would help ATF crack down. On the other side, gun rights advocates say that's unconstitutional, and would not make a difference in Mexican cartel crimes.

Two earlier Demand Letters were initiated in 2000 and affected a relatively small number of gun shops. Demand Letter 3 was to be much more sweeping, affecting 8,500 firearms dealers in four southwest border states: Arizona, California, New Mexico and Texas. ATF chose those states because they "have a significant number of crime guns traced back to them from Mexico." The reporting requirements were to apply if a gun dealer sells two or more long guns to a single person within five business days, and only if the guns are semi-automatic, greater than .22 caliber and can be fitted with a detachable magazine.

On April 25, 2011, ATF announced plans to implement Demand Letter 3. The National Shooting Sports Foundation is suing the ATF to stop the new rules. It calls the regulation an illegal attempt to enforce a law Congress never passed. ATF counters that it has reasonably targeted guns used most often to "commit violent crimes in Mexico, especially by drug gangs."

Reaction

Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, is investigating Fast and Furious, as well as the alleged use of the case to advance gun regulations. "There's plenty of evidence showing that this administration planned to use the tragedies of Fast and Furious as rationale to further their goals of a long gun reporting requirement. But, we've learned from our investigation that reporting multiple long gun sales would do nothing to stop the flow of firearms to known straw purchasers because many Federal Firearms Dealers are already voluntarily reporting suspicious transactions. It's pretty clear that the problem isn't lack of burdensome reporting requirements."

On July 12, 2011, Sen. Grassley and Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., wrote Attorney General Eric Holder, whose Justice Department oversees ATF. They asked Holder whether officials in his agency discussed how "Fast and Furious could be used to justify additional regulatory authorities." So far, they have not received a response. CBS News asked the Justice Department for comment and context on ATF emails about Fast and Furious and Demand Letter 3, but officials declined to speak with us.

"In light of the evidence, the Justice Department's refusal to answer questions about the role Operation Fast and Furious was supposed to play in advancing new firearms regulations is simply unacceptable," Rep. Issa told CBS News.

Amid Sheriff’s Warning, Fed Investigation of IN Dairy Farmer Pulled

2011-12-10T06:49:00.000-08:00

The Complete Patient
December 10, 2011

The U.S. Justice Department has withdrawn its subpoena of Indiana raw dairy farmer Richard Hochstetler to appear before a federal grand jury.

He was scheduled to testify tomorrow in Detroit, in connection with an outbreak of illnesses linked by public health officials, including the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, to the milk of his Forest Grove Dairy. But yesterday he received a certified letter saying that his subpoena was being withdrawn.

Ross Goldstein, a U.S. Justice Department trial attorney, noted in the letter that Hochstetler had previously stated to him that Hochstetler wouldn't answer questions or produce documents based on his Fifth Amendment constitutional rights. "Based on your representation that Forest Grove Dairy is a sole proprietorship and that you refuse to produce any responsive documents based on the assertion of rights guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution against self incrimination, I write to advise you that you are released from the subpoena until further notice." He was advised to retain all documents in the case.

While it's not clear exactly what kind of maneuvering led to the federal pullback, one factor working for Hochstetler may have been the efforts of his county sheriff, Brad Rogers of Elkhart County. He wrote a letter to the Justice Department warning it not to conduct inspections of Hochstetler's farm without a warrant from a local judge. In the process, he got into a debate over the limits of federal power and the U.S. Constitution with the Justice Department's Goldstein.

Earlier this month, Rogers emailed Goldstein that there had been "a number of inspections and attempted inspections on (Hochstetler's) farm..." He warned that "any further attempts to inspect this farm without a warrant signed by a local judge, based on probable cause, will result in Federal inspectors' removal or arrest for trespassing by my officers or I."

That prompted Goldstein to cite the U.S. Constitution's "Supremacy Clause," which he said "has been interpreted since the earliest days of this nation to mean that federal law trumps state law whenever the two conflict."

Goldstein argued further that the Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act allowed federal agents "to enter Mr. Hochstetler's property...without a warrant at all--pursuant to a long line of federal cases..." Moreover, he warned the sheriff that federal agents could arrest him-- "that the 'refusal to permit entry or inspection as authorized by section 374' is in itself a federal criminal offense, which under certain circumstances is a felony punishable by imprisonment for up to three years..."

During an interview, Rogers responded to Goldstein's argument, "When you assert that federal law trumps state law, it is a distortion of the intent, content and extent of the supreme law of the land--the U.S. Constitution-seen through a myopic and misunderstood view of Article VI, section 2 (The Supremacy Clause)."

He also asserted that "the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act could be deemed unconstitutional if and when challenged vis-a-vis the Tenth Amendment juxtaposed with The Commerce Clause."

He added that "our form of government was based on the principle that all officials exist to secure 'Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.'...Such 'cosmetic' regulations will never 'trump' those principles. The citizen in question is a good man and has committed no crime. He is an upstanding member of this community. He does not have to allow access to his property for the FDA to conduct random inspections."

Aside from the sheriff-prosecutor debate, the affair had received publicity via this blog and an article I wrote for Food Safety News, detailing how extensive testing of Hochstetler's milk in 2010 had shown no signs of campylobacter, and how FDA officials had targeted Hochstetler and another farmer, Richard Hebron, of Family Farms Co-op, in meetings in 2009.

The matter of Hebron and the grand jury is still up in the air. He was scheduled to testify before the federal grand jury with Hochstetler tomorrow in Detroit. He told me he is currently in the process of working with the Farm-to-Consumer Legal Defense Fund to submit documentation to the Justice Department that his farm also is not registered as a corporation or a cooperative, but is a sole proprietorship.

When I asked Hochstetler, who is Amish, whether he was relieved about the turn of events, he said, "I never got too excited about it. It is spiritual warfare between good and evil and if we have God on our side, we will win."

***
The grand jury investigation of Hochstetler and Hebron is directly related to tomorrow's Raw Milk Freedom Riders event in Wisconsin and Illinois.

The Raw Milk Freedom Riders are challenging the interstate ban on raw milk shipments, which is the federal regulation used to go after Hochstetler and Hebron. The event tomorrow will involve a group of Chicago mothers, acting as "agents" on behalf of other moms, traveling to Wisconsin to pick up milk at a raw dairy there and returning with it to a Chicago park, where a demonstration will be held. There's a report on the demonstration as well in the current Food Safety News.

The FDA has failed to recognize agents acting on behalf of individual consumers as being outside the realm of the federal prohibition. The rally will be at Independence Park, 3850 West Irving Park Road, Chicago, IL. 60618, from 11:30 to 2.

One final reason to attend: you'll get to meet Michael Schmidt, the raw dairy farmer who is traveling from Canada to attend the rally. Given all that is going on north of the border to stamp out raw milk, it's pretty amazing that he would take time to come to come to this American rally. I hope to see some of you there.

Update on Wednesday, December 7, 2011 at 04:48PM by The Complete Patient

Update on Richard Hebron: He was advised late Tuesday afternoon that he does not have to appear before the federal grand jury tomorrow, based on his notification to the Justic Department that he was exercising his Fifth Amendment rights and refusing to provide requested documentation.

However, the cancellation of his appearance was less definitive than that of David Hochstetler. The Justice Department's trial attorney, Ross Goldstein, said in an email to Hebron's attorney, Gary Cox of the Farm-to-Consumer Legal Defense Fund, "The United States has not yet determined what course of action it will pursue, if any, with regard to your client's refusal to produce documents in response to the subpoena." In other words, the government is leaving the door open to follow-up action of some sort to determine if Hebron can be forced to produce documents.

Is Defense Authorization Act Treasonous?

2011-12-07T19:47:00.000-08:00

News With Views
December 7, 2011

At first glance, I had some doubts about all the hoopla over the pending Defense Authorization Act and claims that it was essentially a declaration of war on American citizens, under the guise of national security and annual defense appropriations.

Then I read the bill and connected the dots that every American must connect immediately.

The treasonous text in that bill reads as follows; (pay close attention to the areas in bold)

(a) In General- Congress affirms that the authority of the President to use all necessary and appropriate force [1] pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107-40) includes the authority for the Armed Forces of the United States to detain covered persons (as defined in subsection (b) pending disposition under the law of war.[2]

(b) Covered Persons- A covered person under this section is any person as follows:

(1) A person who planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored those responsible for those attacks.

(2) A person who was a part of or substantially supported al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners,[3] including any person who has committed a belligerent act[4] or has directly supported such hostilities in aid of such enemy forces.[5]

Before directly addressing this text and in an effort to fully grasp how this text is an act of treason against the American people, there are a few fundamental facts one must understand.

• Our Armed Services exist for one reason alone, at the service of the people, to protect and defend the Unites States, The U.S. Constitution and the American people against all enemies, both foreign and domestic. This is the primary purpose and function of our federal government.
• The Laws of War as written by William Winthrop, also known as Military Law or the Uniform Code of Military Justice, operate entirely separate and independent from the Civil Justice System, including the suspension of fundamental Constitutional Rights for both members of the Military and those designated enemy combatants.
• Following Bill Clinton’s lead in 1996 and immediately upon seizing office, the Obama Administration issued a Homeland Security Report directly identifying members of the US Military, Veterans and American citizens with dissenting views towards the current direction of our country as “potential domestic terrorists” and “right-wing extremists.”
• The Obama Administration has been cross-training state and local law enforcement agencies on dealing with “urban warfare” aimed at so-called “right-wing extremists” which is now defined as anyone opposed to Global Governance and national socialism.
• American courts no longer enforce the law or the Constitution. Instead, they make up the law as they go via unbridled interpretation powers exceeding their constitutional authority, all in the name of “social justice,” not to be confused with actual justice.

As a result, the language in Sections 1031 and 1032 of the Defense Authorization Act amount to treason against the American people, as an open-ended power of the Executive Branch to indefinitely detain, incarcerate and interrogate American citizens on the basis of suspicion or accusations without even bring any criminal charges, much less providing due process of the law.

What if the person sitting in the Oval Office is a foreign born domestic enemy of the United States? -- What if the Administration is willing to use the full power of the federal government and the U.S. Military to force its political will upon the people, deeming every dissenter as a “potential domestic terrorist?” -- What if the American courts make up laws as they go without any regard for written laws or the U.S. Constitution?

Guess what? That’s exactly what we have today!

The current Defense Authorization Act gives the President of the United States the unbridled power to use the U.S. Military against American citizens, their Constitutional Rights suspended under the Laws of War.

That’s what this text says and that’s how today’s courts will interpret that language.

Breaking Down the Text

1 - “authority of the President to use all necessary and appropriate force” – Appropriate force is not the same thing as necessary force. Military force against American citizens is entirely inappropriate. But if the federal government keeps destroying the constitutional republic, it may well become necessary. NO single politician can be trusted with this much power.

2 - “Use of Military Force (Public Law 107-40) includes the authority for the Armed Forces of the United States to detain covered persons (as defined in subsection (b)) pending disposition under the law of war.” – Use of Military force against American citizens is entirely inappropriate and even unconstitutional, whether deemed necessary or not. Placing American citizens under the Laws of War is placing them under Martial Law, including the suspension of all Constitutional Rights. It is an act of war against the American people and that is an act of treason.

3 - “associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners,” – What constitutes “associated forces” – “engaged in hostilities against the United States?” Are Wall Street protesters engaged in hostilities against the United States? Are college students protesting higher tuitions engaged in hostilities against the United States when they smash store windows or set cars on fire? Is someone engaged in hostilities against France or England a potential domestic terrorist? Are Tea Party rallies an act of aggression against the federal government of the United States? Is the mere accusation enough?

4 - “any person who has committed a belligerent act” – All of the acts described in item above can be deemed “belligerent acts.” Is there any such thing as wrongful prosecution under the Laws of War? You had better read the Laws of War.

5 - “has directly supported such hostilities in aid of such enemy forces” – Is Ron Paul guilty of hostile acts in support of enemy forces for blaming the United States for all the attacks on the United States? Paul is one of only six House Republicans to vote against the bill. Is Code Pink guilty of aiding and abetting enemy forces? Are they subject to U.S. Military attacks on US soil for their hostile actions in support of our nation’s enemies? Are members of congress currently bankrupting the nation acting hostile and belligerent towards the United States?

The U.S. House passed this bill on May 26, 2011 by a vote of 322-96, including Tea Party darlings Michelle Bachmann, Marco Rubio and Allen West.

The Senate bill passed on December 1, 2011 by a vote of 93-7. Merry Christmas! Only three Senate Republicans voted against the bill, Coburn (OK), Lee (UT) and Paul (KY). Did all other Republicans know what they were voting for?

If you are still trying to figure out just how far your federal government is willing to go to complete implementation of UN Agenda 21 and the U.S. Global Governance Plan, look no further than the passage of the Defense Authorization Act for 2012, paying very close attention to the text discussed in this column.

Could this new law place American soldiers in direct violation of their oaths to protect and defend the U.S. Constitution and the American people against all enemies?

The legislation itself does not… but an order from the President of the United States to go to weapons against American citizens certainly would. How would American soldiers react to such an outrageous order? Only time will tell…

Our federal government is 100% committed to implementing a plan for Global Government which will bring about the end of American sovereignty, security and superiority in the world. Citizens willing to stand opposed may indeed fall within the provisional power just granted to the President in this legislation and could well find themselves persecuted under the Laws of War rather than the Civil Justice System.

More than ever in U.S. history, it is vital that the American people to know their enemies and their options. Unless they can find a way to keep Obama from signing this bill into law, their options will be limited to the broad interpretations of today’s broken legal system.

God help us!

$80,000 USAFA Pagan Ritual Site Up and Running

2011-12-07T19:42:00.000-08:00

CP
December 7, 2011

The United States Air Force Academy has worship spaces for most of the world’s major religions. But until last year, cadets who followed Earth-based religions – including Pagans and Wiccans – were lacking a proper area to practice rituals in.

Now, about four to seven of the 4,300 USAFA cadets gather each week at the academy’s new pagan ritual site, called the Cadet Chapel Falcon Circle, to participate in what the academy says are “smudging ceremonies, meditation and ceremonial magic.”

Meade Warthen, chief of the Media Relations Division for the academy, told The Christian Post in an email, “Three cadets have formerly identified themselves as Pagan. Currently, there are no self-identified Gardnerian Wicca, Dianic Wicca, Seax Wicca, Wicca, Druid, or Shaman cadets.”

The LA Times reported that to date, there are no witches among the cadets this year either. "But the two spiritual leaders for all Earth-based religions – one a civilian, one an Air Force reservist – are witches and regularly cast spells, which they say is not so different from offering prayer.”

The conservative group Family Research Council argues that the new worship space is more about political correctness than religious freedom.

“Despite what the secular movement believes, our government is under no obligation to spend taxpayer dollars elevating fringe groups,” FRC said in a statement.

The academy decided to build the worship space after cadets put in a request for it last year, which was then approved through the academy’s chain of command. Another reason the academy cites for the new site is the First Amendment.

In a statement to The Christian Post, the USAFA said First Amendment freedoms don’t “just apply to the mainline faith groups, i.e., Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Orthodox, Muslim, etc. It also applies to atheists, secularists, freethinkers, and those belief systems usually classified under the umbrella term of ‘Earth-Centered Spirituality,’ i.e., Pagans, Druids, Wiccans, etc. Whether anyone likes or agrees with that or not does not change the Constitution.”

The academy added, “The mission of the Chaplain Corps is not to advance religious diversity, but accommodate it when and where possible when asked to do so. We were asked to do so, and we responded in a manner that maximizes the utilization potential of the resource investment.”

The resource investment in this case totaled $80,000.

The ritual site is situated on a hill above the Cadet Chapel and has two Stonehenge type rings of boulders. Inside the boulders sits a low propane stone fire pit. Tech. Sgt. Brandon Longcrier, NCO in charge of the Academy's Astronautics laboratories, worked with the chapel to create the worship area. Sergeant Longcrier became Pagan shortly after arriving at the academy in 2006.

"When I first arrived here, Earth-centered cadets didn't have anywhere to call home," he said in a USAFA release. "Now, they meet every Monday night, they get to go on retreats, and they have a stone circle. ... We have representation on the Cadet Interfaith Council, and I even meet with the Chaplains at Peterson Air Force Base once a year to discuss religious climate."

When asked if they will continue building religious sites for other religions, the academy said it “will take new requests from different cadet faith communities for space as they come.” In each case, the USAFA will look at available resources, the number of cadets who participate in those religions and the space requirements for the rituals.

Earth-centered spirituality includes traditions such as Wicca and Druidism. Some Earth-centered traditions involve the worship of gods and goddesses, whereas others may involve only one deity or none at all. Reincarnation is a popular concept, as is rebirth and celebrating the cycle of the seasons.

FAQ: Will Your ISP Protect Your Privacy?

2011-10-12T20:24:00.000-07:00

PC World
October 12, 2011

Can law enforcement shut off your Internet access? Does your ISP have a data retention policy, and who is it sharing that with? Stay informed with our handy guide to tech activism.

The Bay Area Rapid Transit District's August shutdown of wireless service to squelch a demonstration in San Francisco raised anew questions about the use of technology in the face of authority. In this fourth installment in a series of FAQs, we examine the responsibilities of Internet service providers to protect your privacy. Be sure to check out the first three installments: a guide to which social networks fight for your rights, a primer on your right to phone service during a protest and a discussion of your right to photograph the police.

Political activists using technology to stay organized should take care with what they share online. Earlier this week we learned that Google and Internet service provider Sonic.net were forced to hand over WikiLeaks volunteer Jacob Applebaum's GMail account data, including the names and addresses of people he corresponded with (though not the actual content of his correspondence.)

Both Sonic.net and Google fought the court order, suing for the right to inform Applebaum that his private data was being asked for. Will your ISP do the same? No ISP can withhold information if the agent requesting it has a legal warrant, but your ISP can still protect your privacy by minimizing how much identifying data is retained on their servers, and for how long.

Image Left - Police raid a New York residence after monitoring suspicious IP activity. (Source: UTNE Reader)

That’s why civil liberties groups in the European Union are railing against the Data Retention Directive, which requires all member states to retain private telecommunications data--including IP addresses and traffic logs--for up to two years and turn it over to police with a court order. A similar data retention law is being pushed through the U.S. Congress under the header H.R. 1981, rankling privacy advocates and jeopardizing your anonymity online.

To help you stay informed about what data your ISP retains, we did a little digging on the privacy policies and legal track records of big-name broadband providers. Unfortunately, electronic surveillance and telecommunication law is always evolving and thus the information in this FAQ is not intended as legal advice. If you feel your rights have been violated, we encourage you to seek counsel from a legal professional.

What records does my ISP retain, and for how long?

It’s hard to know for sure, since Internet service providers are private organizations and thus exempt from disclosing their internal affairs. “We don’t actually know how much user data most major ISPs retain or for how long they retain it, because ISPs are not legally required to disclose that information,” said Chris Conley, a Technology and Civil Liberties Fellow with the ACLU of Northern California.

But we do know that every time you connect to the Internet, your Internet service provider assigns you a dynamic IP address and ties it to your activities online, logging at least the time and date of every website you visit. Technically these logs are anonymous since they’re tied to your IP address rather than your name, but since your ISP records which IP address is assigned to which subscriber, it’s child’s play for an investigator to figure out where you’ve been and who you’ve been talking to if your ISP turns over those records.

That said, you probably don't need to worry about someone else cracking into your network and making mischief with an IP address linked to your account; while it's possible for spammers and child pornographers to co-opt your network and get your IP address blacklisted, it's not worth worrying about. For a deeper analysis of the potential dangers of IP spoofing, we recommend reading through the discussion that grew out of Bruce Schneier's Open Wi-Fi post a few years ago.

While we don’t have much credible evidence on the data retention practices of broadband ISPs, we do know the cellular branches of telecoms like Verizon and AT&T retain your cellular IP data for up to a year. Virgin Mobile and Verizon Wireless go even farther, retaining records of the content of your text messages for days or even months afterward. The full details can be found in the 2010 law enforcement guide to data retention periods of major cellular service providers published by the U.S. Department of Justice after a Freedom of Information Act request by the ACLU of North Carolina.

Click on the image for a Department of Justice guide to ISP data retention, secured by the ACLU of North Carolina via FOIA request.

Will my Internet service provider turn over their records if the government demands it?

Yes. While we enjoy Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable search and seizure of our physical property by government agents, modern telecommunications law is very vague about what constitutes unreasonable searches and seizures when it comes to private data stored online.

For now, we relinquish the lion’s share of our Fourth Amendment protection when we voluntarily sign up for service from a commercial provider like AT&T. Should you need to pursue legal action, know that U.S. courts have a history of siding with the government in privacy disputes over data stored with third parties. This precedent is colloquially known as the “third party doctrine,” and it makes it much easier for law enforcement agencies to shake down your ISP since they only need to secure a subpoena or court order to access your digital records. In contrast, obtaining a search warrant after showing probable cause--which is hard to do--is required to search your home.

Legally speaking, it gets even easier for law enforcement officials to access your records the longer they are stored. According to Section 2703 of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986, investigators need a search warrant to access data stored for less than 6 months by an electronic communication service. Most unopened emails fall into this category.

Worse, opened mail and other messages which you have read are often classified as being in remote storage the moment you read them and thus do not enjoy the 180-day search warrant protection of an unread message. If the government is after data that has been stored longer than 6 months they can compel your ISP to hand over your data with just a subpoena or court order and a promise to provide prior notice, which can itself be delayed indefinitely in 90-day increments if notifying you might jeopardize an investigation.

Thankfully, Section 2702 of the ECPA bars your Internet service provider from voluntarily disclosing the contents of any message stored or delivered via their service. But your ISP is allowed to voluntarily disclose noncontent data such as your IP address and logs of which sites you’ve visited, and many do so.

Can law enforcement agencies shut down my Internet access without my knowledge?

Internet access is not recognized as a federal right in the United States, so there’s nothing stopping your Internet service provider from cutting you off. If you read our primer on your right to phone service, you’ll know that under the Federal Communications Act of 1934 the Federal Communications Commission regulates broadband Internet access as a Title I information service, and thus ISPs can shut down your Internet access for any reason with no immediate repercussions.

Internet access is still a privilege here in the States. Much like social networks, Internet service providers are private actors with few restrictions on how they manage and disclose our data. Digital liberty organizations like the Digital Due Process Coalition and the Electronic Frontier Foundation are working to change that, but until they do, think carefully about your online activities: You never know who might be watching.

Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars

2011-09-25T08:19:00.000-07:00

The Lawful Path
September 25, 2011

The following document is taken from two sources. The first, was acquired on a website (of which I can't remember the address) listing as its source the book titled Behold A Pale Horse by William Cooper; Light Technology Publishing, 1991. The second source is a crudely copied booklet which does not contain a copyright notice, or a publishers name. With the exception of the Forward, the Preface, the main thing that was missing from the first source was the illustrations. As we began comparing the two, we realized that the illustrations, and the accompanying text (also missing from the first) made up a significant part of the document. This had, and so far as I know, is the only internet copy available complete with the illustrations.

We have no first-hand knowledge that this document is genuine, however many of the concepts contained herein are certainly reasonable, important, and bear strong consideration.

If anyone has additional knowledge about the source of this document; has better copies of the illustrations than the ones posted here; has any missing pieces to this document, or has any comments which can improve upon the quality of this document, we will appreciate your comments.

FORWARD

This manuscript was delivered to our offices by an unknown person. We did not steal the document, nor are we involved with any theft from the United States Government, and we did not get the document by way of any dishonest methods. We feel that we are not endangering the "National Security" by reproducing this document, quite the contrary; it has been authenticated and we feel that we are not only within our rights to publish it, but morally bound to do so.

Regarding the training manual, you may have detected that we had to block out the marginal notes made by the selectee at the C.I.A. Training Center, but I can assure you that the manual is authentic, and was printed for the purpose of introducing the selectee to the conspiracy. It has been authenticated by four different technical writers for Military Intelligence, one just recently retired who wants very much to have this manual distributed throughout the world, and one who is still employed as an Electronics Engineer by the Federal Government, and has access to the entire series of Training Manuals. One was stationed in Hawaii, and held the highest security clearance in the Naval Intelligence, and another who is now teaching at a university, and has been working with the Central Intelligence Agency for a number of years, and wants out before the axe falls on the conspirators.

We believed that the entire world should know about this plan, so we distributed internationally one-hundred of these manuscripts, to ask individuals at top level positions their opinions. The consensus opinion was to distribute this to as many people as who wanted it, to the end that they would not only understand that "War" had been declared against them, but would be able to properly identify the true enemy to Humanity.

Delamer Duverus

PREFACE

Conspiracy theories are nothing new to history. Plots to "kill Caesar" and overthrow Rome abounded, for instance. however, it is seldom that concrete clues to such plots come to light, and are generally known.

Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars, An Introduction Programming Manual was uncovered quite by accident on July 7, 1986 when an employee of Boeing Aircraft Co. purchased a surplus IBM copier for scrap parts at a sale, and discovered inside details of a plan, hatched in the embryonic days of the "Cold War" which called for control of the masses through manipulation of industry, peoples' pastimes, education and political leanings. It called for a quiet revolution, putting brother against brother, and diverting the public's attention from what is really going on.

The document you are about to read is real. It is reprinted in its virgin form, with diagrams, as a touch of reality.

The following document, dated May 1979, was found on July 7, 1986, in an IBM copier that had been purchased at a surplus sale.

TOP SECRET
Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars
Operations Research Technical Manual TM-SW7905.1

This publication marks the 25th anniversary of the Third World War, called the "Quiet War", being conducted using subjective biological warfare, fought with "silent weapons."

This book contains an introductory description of this war, its strategies, and its weaponry.

May 1979 #74-1120

SECURITY

It is patently impossible to discuss social engineering or the automation of a society, i.e., the engineering of social automation systems (silent weapons) on a national or worldwide scale without implying extensive objectives of social control and destruction of human life, i.e., slavery and genocide.

This manual is in itself an analog declaration of intent. Such a writing must be secured from public scrutiny. Otherwise, it might be recognized as a technically formal declaration of domestic war. Furthermore, whenever any person or group of persons in a position of great power and without full knowledge and consent of the public, uses such knowledge and methodologies for economic conquest - it must be understood that a state of domestic warfare exists between said person or group of persons and the public.

The solution of today's problems requires an approach which is ruthlessly candid, with no agonizing over religious, moral or cultural values.

You have qualified for this project because of your ability to look at human society with cold objectivity, and yet analyze and discuss your observations and conclusions with others of similar intellectual capacity without the loss of discretion or humility. Such virtues are exercised in your own best interest. Do not deviate from them.

Historical Introduction

Silent weapon technology has evolved from Operations Research (O.R.), a strategic and tactical methodology developed under the Military Management in England during World War II. The original purpose of Operations Research was to study the strategic and tactical problems of air and land defense with the objective of effective use of limited military resources against foreign enemies (i.e., logistics).

It was soon recognized by those in positions of power that the same methods might be useful for totally controlling a society. But better tools were necessary.

Social engineering (the analysis and automation of a society) requires the correlation of great amounts of constantly changing economic information (data), so a high-speed computerized data-processing system was necessary which could race ahead of the society and predict when society would arrive for capitulation.

Relay computers were to slow, but the electronic computer, invented in 1946 by J. Presper Eckert and John W. Mauchly, filled the bill.

The next breakthrough was the development of the simplex method of linear programming in 1947 by the mathematician George B. Dantzig.

Then in 1948, the transistor, invented by J. Bardeen, W.H. Brattain, and W. Shockley, promised great expansion of the computer field by reducing space and power requirements.

With these three inventions under their direction, those in positions of power strongly suspected that it was possible for them to control the whole world with the push of a button.

Immediately, the Rockefeller Foundation got in on the ground floor by making a four-year grant to Harvard College, funding the Harvard Economic Research Project for the study of the structure of the American Economy. One year later, in 1949, The United States Air Force joined in.

In 1952 the grant period terminated, and a high-level meeting of the Elite was held to determine the next phase of social operations research. The Harvard project had been very fruitful, as is borne out by the publication of some of its results in 1953 suggesting the feasibility of economic (social) engineering. (Studies in the Structure of the American Economy - copyright 1953 by Wassily Leontief, International Science Press Inc., White Plains, New York).

Engineered in the last half of the decade of the 1940's, the new Quiet War machine stood, so to speak, in sparkling gold-plated hardware on the showroom floor by 1954.

With the creation of the maser in 1954, the promise of unlocking unlimited sources of fusion atomic energy from the heavy hydrogen in sea water and the consequent availability of unlimited social power was a possibility only decades away.

The combination was irresistible.

The Quiet War was quietly declared by the International Elite at a meeting held in 1954.

Although the silent weapons system was nearly exposed 13 years later, the evolution of the new weapon-system has never suffered any major setbacks.

This volume marks the 25th anniversary of the beginning of the Quiet War. Already this domestic war has had many victories on many fronts throughout the world.

Political Introduction

In 1954 it was well recognized by those in positions of authority that it was only a matter of time, only a few decades, before the general public would be able to grasp and upset the cradle of power, for the very elements of the new silent-weapon technology were as accessible for a public utopia as they were for providing a private utopia.

The issue of primary concern, that of dominance, revolved around the subject of the energy sciences.

Energy

Energy is recognized as the key to all activity on earth. Natural science is the study of the sources and control of natural energy, and social science, theoretically expressed as economics, is the study of the sources and control of social energy. Both are bookkeeping systems: mathematics. Therefore, mathematics is the primary energy science. And the bookkeeper can be king if the public can be kept ignorant of the methodology of the bookkeeping.

All science is merely a means to an end. The means is knowledge. The end is control. Beyond this remains only one issue: Who will be the beneficiary?

In 1954 this was the issue of primary concern. Although the so-called "moral issues" were raised, in view of the law of natural selection it was agreed that a nation or world of people who will not use their intelligence are no better than animals who do not have intelligence. Such people are beasts of burden and steaks on the table by choice and consent.

Consequently, in the interest of future world order, peace, and tranquillity, it was decided to privately wage a quiet war against the American public with an ultimate objective of permanently shifting the natural and social energy (wealth) of the undisciplined and irresponsible many into the hands of the self-disciplined, responsible, and worthy few.

In order to implement this objective, it was necessary to create, secure, and apply new weapons which, as it turned out, were a class of weapons so subtle and sophisticated in their principle of operation and public appearance as to earn for themselves the name "silent weapons."

In conclusion, the objective of economic research, as conducted by the magnates of capital (banking) and the industries of commodities (goods) and services, is the establishment of an economy which is totally predictable and manipulatable.

In order to achieve a totally predictable economy, the low-class elements of society must be brought under total control, i.e., must be housebroken, trained, and assigned a yoke and long-term social duties from a very early age, before they have an opportunity to question the propriety of the matter. In order to achieve such conformity, the lower-class family unit must be disintegrated by a process of increasing preoccupation of the parents and the establishment of government-operated day-care centers for the occupationally orphaned children.

The quality of education given to the lower class must be of the poorest sort, so that the moat of ignorance isolating the inferior class from the superior class is and remains incomprehensible to the inferior class. With such an initial handicap, even bright lower class individuals have little if any hope of extricating themselves from their assigned lot in life. This form of slavery is essential to maintain some measure of social order, peace, and tranquillity for the ruling upper class.

Descriptive Introduction of the Silent Weapon

Everything that is expected from an ordinary weapon is expected from a silent weapon by its creators, but only in its own manner of functioning.

It shoots situations, instead of bullets; propelled by data processing, instead of chemical reaction (explosion); originating from bits of data, instead of grains of gunpowder; from a computer, instead of a gun; operated by a computer programmer, instead of a marksman; under the orders of a banking magnate, instead of a military general.

It makes no obvious explosive noises, causes no obvious physical or mental injuries, and does not obviously interfere with anyone's daily social life.

Yet it makes an unmistakable "noise," causes unmistakable physical and mental damage, and unmistakably interferes with the daily social life, i.e., unmistakable to a trained observer, one who knows what to look for.

The public cannot comprehend this weapon, and therefore cannot believe that they are being attacked and subdued by a weapon.

The public might instinctively feel that something is wrong, but that is because of the technical nature of the silent weapon, they cannot express their feeling in a rational way, or handle the problem with intelligence. Therefore, they do not know how to cry for help, and do not know how to associate with others to defend themselves against it.

When a silent weapon is applied gradually, the public adjusts/adapts to its presence and learns to tolerate its encroachment on their lives until the pressure (psychological via economic) becomes too great and they crack up.

Therefore, the silent weapon is a type of biological warfare. It attacks the vitality, options, and mobility of the individuals of a society by knowing, understanding, manipulating, and attacking their sources of natural and social energy, and their physical, mental, and emotional strengths and weaknesses.

Theoretical Introduction

Give me control over a nation's currency, and I care not who makes its laws.
-- Mayer Amschel Rothschild, 1743 - 1812)

Today's silent weapons technology is an outgrowth of a simple idea discovered, succinctly expressed, and effectively applied by the quoted Mr. Mayer Amschel Rothschild. Mr. Rothschild discovered the missing passive component of economic theory known as economic inductance. He, of course, did not think of his discovery in these 20th-century terms, and, to be sure, mathematical analysis had to wait for the Second Industrial Revolution, the rise of the theory of mechanics and electronics, and finally, the invention of the electronic computer before it could be effectively applied in the control of the world economy.

General Energy Concepts

In the study of energy systems, there always appears three elementary concepts. These are potential energy, kinetic energy, and energy dissipation. And corresponding to these concepts, there are three idealized, essentially pure physical counterparts called passive components.

In the science of physical mechanics, the phenomenon of potential energy is associated with a physical property called elasticity or stiffness, and can be represented by a stretched spring.
In electronic science, potential energy is stored in a capacitor instead of a spring. This property is called capacitance instead of elasticity or stiffness.
In the science of physical mechanics, the phenomenon of kinetic energy is associated with a physical property called inertia or mass, and can be represented by a mass or a flywheel in motion.
In electronic science, kinetic energy is stored in an inductor (in a magnetic field) instead of a mass. This property is called inductance instead of inertia.
In the science of physical mechanics, the phenomenon of energy dissipation is associated with a physical property called friction or resistance, and can be represented by a dashpot or other device which converts energy into heat.
In electronic science, dissipation of energy is performed by an element called either a resistor or a conductor, the term "resistor" being the one generally used to describe a more ideal device (e.g., wire) employed to convey electronic energy efficiently from one location to another. The property of a resistance or conductor is measured as either resistance or conductance reciprocals.

In economics these three energy concepts are associated with:

Economic Capacitance - Capital (money, stock/inventory, investments in buildings and durables, etc.)
Economic Conductance - Goods (production flow coefficients)
Economic Inductance - Services (the influence of the population of industry on output)

All of the mathematical theory developed in the study of one energy system (e.g., mechanics, electronics, etc.) can be immediately applied in the study of any other energy system (e.g., economics).

Mr. Rothchild's Energy Discovery

What Mr. Rothschild had discovered was the basic principle of power, influence, and control over people as applied to economics. That principle is "when you assume the appearance of power, people soon give it to you."

Mr. Rothschild had discovered that currency or deposit loan accounts had the required appearance of power that could be used to induce people (inductance, with people corresponding to a magnetic field) into surrendering their real wealth in exchange for a promise of greater wealth (instead of real compensation). They would put up real collateral in exchange for a loan of promissory notes. Mr. Rothschild found that he could issue more notes than he had backing for, so long as he had someone's stock of gold as a persuader to show his customers.

Mr. Rothschild loaned his promissory notes to individual and to governments. These would create overconfidence. Then he would make money scarce, tighten control of the system, and collect the collateral through the obligation of contracts. The cycle was then repeated. These pressures could be used to ignite a war. Then he would control the availability of currency to determine who would win the war. That government which agreed to give him control of its economic system got his support.

Collection of debts was guaranteed by economic aid to the enemy of the debtor. The profit derived from this economic methodology mad Mr. Rothschild all the more able to expand his wealth. He found that the public greed would allow currency to be printed by government order beyond the limits (inflation) of backing in precious metal or the production of goods and services.

Apparent Capital as "Paper" Inductor

In this structure, credit, presented as a pure element called "currency," has the appearance of capital, but is in effect negative capital. Hence, it has the appearance of service, but is in fact, indebtedness or debt. It is therefore an economic inductance instead of an economic capacitance, and if balanced in no other way, will be balanced by the negation of population (war, genocide). The total goods and services represent real capital called the gross national product, and currency may be printed up to this level and still represent economic capacitance; but currency printed beyond this level is subtractive, represents the introduction of economic inductance, and constitutes notes of indebtedness.

War is therefore the balancing of the system by killing the true creditors (the public which we have taught to exchange true value for inflated currency) and falling back on whatever is left of the resources of nature and regeneration of those resources.

Mr. Rothschild had discovered that currency gave him the power to rearrange the economic structure to his own advantage, to shift economic inductance to those economic positions which would encourage the greatest economic instability and oscillation.

The final key to economic control had to wait until there was sufficient data and high-speed computing equipment to keep close watch on the economic oscillations created by price shocking and excess paper energy credits - paper inductance/inflation.

Breakthrough

The aviation field provided the greatest evolution in economic engineering by way of the mathematical theory of shock testing. In this process, a projectile is fired from an airframe on the ground and the impulse of the recoil is monitored by vibration transducers connected to the airframe and wired to chart recorders.

By studying the echoes or reflections of the recoil impulse in the airframe, it is possible to discover critical vibrations in the structure of the airframe which either vibrations of the engine or aeolian vibrations of the wings, or a combination of the two, might reinforce resulting in a resonant self-destruction of the airframe in flight as an aircraft. From the standpoint of engineering, this means that the strengths and weaknesses of the structure of the airframe in terms of vibrational energy can be discovered and manipulated.

Application in Economics

To use this method of airframe shock testing in economic engineering, the prices of commodities are shocked, and the public consumer reaction is monitored. The resulting echoes of the economic shock are interpreted theoretically by computers and the psycho-economic structure of the economy is thus discovered. It is by this process that partial differential and difference matrices are discovered that define the family household and make possible its evaluation as an economic industry (dissipative consumer structure).

Then the response of the household to future shocks can be predicted and manipulated, and society becomes a well-regulated animal with its reins under the control of a sophisticated computer-regulated social energy bookkeeping system.

Eventually every individual element of the structure comes under computer control through a knowledge of personal preferences, such knowledge guaranteed by computer association of consumer preferences (universal product code, UPC; zebra-striped pricing codes on packages) with identified consumers (identified via association with the use of a credit card and later a permanent "tattooed" body number invisible under normal ambient illumination).

Summary

Economics is only a social extension of a natural energy system. It, also, has its three passive components. Because of the distribution of wealth and the lack of communication and lack of data, this field has been the last energy field for which a knowledge of these three passive components has been developed.

Since energy is the key to all activity on the face of the earth, it follows that in order to attain a monopoly of energy, raw materials, goods, and services and to establixh a world system of slave labor, it is necessary to have a first strike capability in the field of economics. In order to maintain our position, it is necessary that we have absolute first knowledge of the science of control over all economic factors and the first experience at engineering the world economy.

In order to achieve such sovereignty, we must at least achieve this one end: that the public will not make either the logical or mathematical connection between economics and the other energy sciences or learn to apply such knowledge.

This is becoming increasingly difficult to control because more and more businesses are making demands upon their computer programmers to create and apply mathematical models for the management of those businesses.

It is only a matter of time before the new breed of private programmer/economists will catch on to the far reaching implications of the work begun at Harvard in 1948. The speed with which they can communicate their warning to the public will largely depend upon how effective we have been at controlling the media, subverting education, and keeping the public distracted with matters of no real importance.

The Economic Model

Economics, as a social energy science has as a first objective the description of the complex way in which any given unit of resources is used to satisfy some economic want. (Leontief Matrix). This first objective, when it is extended to get the most product from the least or limited resources, comprises that objective of general military and industrial logistics known as Operations Research. (See simplex method of linear programming.)

The Harvard Economic Research Project (1948-) was an extension of World War II Operations Research. Its purpose was to discover the science of controlling an economy: at first the American economy, and then the world economy. It was felt that with sufficient mathematical foundation and data, it would be nearly as easy to predict and control the trend of an economy as to predict and control the trajectory of a projectile. Such has proven to be the case. Moreover, the economy has been transformed into a guided missile on target.

The immediate aim of the Harvard project was to discover the economic structure, what forces change that structure, how the behavior of the structure can be predicted, and how it can be manipulated. What was needed was a well-organized knowledge of the mathematical structures and interrelationships of investment, production, distribution, and consumption.

To make a short story of it all, it was discovered that an economy obeyed the same laws as electricity and that all of the mathematical theory and practical and computer know-how developed for the electronic field could be directly applied in the study of economics. This discovery was not openly declared, and its more subtle implications were and are kept a closely guarded secret, for example that in an economic model, human life is measured in dollars, and that the electric spark generated when opening a switch connected to an active inductor is mathematically analogous to the initiation of war.

The greatest hurdle which theoretical economists faced was the accurate description of the household as an industry. This is a challenge because consumer purchases are a matter of choice which in turn is influenced by income, price, and other economic factors.

This hurdle was cleared in an indirect and statistically approximate way by an application of shock testing to determine the current characteristics, called current technical coefficients, of a household industry

Finally, because problems in theoretical electronics can be translated very easily into problems of theoretical electronics, and the solution translated back again, it follows that only a book of language translation and concept definition needed to be written for economics. The remainder could be gotten from standard works on mathematics and electronics. This makes the publication of books on advanced economics unnecessary, and greatly simplifies project security.

Industrial Diagrams

An ideal industry is defined as a device which receives value from other industries in several forms and converts them into one specific product for sales and distribution to other industries. It has several inputs and one output. What the public normally thinks of as one industry is really an industrial complex, where several industries under one roof produce one or more products.

A pure (single output) industry can be represented oversimply by a circuit block as follows:

The flow of product from industry #1 (supply) to industry #2 (demand) is denoted by 1₁₂. The total flow out of industry "K" is denoted by I_k (sales, etc.).

A three industry network can be diagrammed as follows:

A node is a symbol of collection and distribution of flow. Node #3 receives from industry #3 and distributes to industries #1 and #3. If industry #3 manufactures chairs, then a flow from industry #3 back to industry #3 simply indicates that industry #3 is using part of its own output product, for example, as office furniture. Therefore the flow may be summarized by the equations:

Three Industrial Classes

Industries fall into three categories or classes by type of output:

Class #1 - Capital (resources)
Class #2 - Goods (commodities or use - dissipative)
Class #3 - Services (action of population)

Class #1 industries exist at three levels:
1. Nature - sources of energy and raw materials.
2. Government - printing of currency equal to the gross national product (GNP), and extension of currency in excess of GNP.
3. Banking - loaning of money for interest, and extension (inflation/counterfeiting) of economic value through the deposit loan accounts.
Class #2 industries exist as producers of tangible or consumer (dissipated) products. This sort of activity is usually recognized and labeled by the public as "industry."
Class #3 industries are those which have service rather than a tangible product as their output. These industries are called (1) households, and (2) governments. Their output is human activity of a mechanical sort, and their basis is population.

Aggregation

The whole economic system can be represented by a three-industry model if one allows the names of the outputs to be (1) capital, (2) goods, and (3) services. The problem with this representation is that it would not show the influence, say, the textile industry on the ferrous metal industry. This is because both the textile industry and the ferrous metal industry would be contained within a single classification called the "goods industry" and by this process of combining or aggregating these two industries under one system block they would lose their economic individuality.

The E-Model

A national economy consists of simultaneous flows of production, distribution, consumption, and investment. If all of these elements including labor and human functions are assigned a numerical value in like units of measure, say, 1939 dollars, then this flow can be further represented by a current flow in an electronic circuit, and its behavior can be predicted and manipulated with useful precision.

The three ideal passive energy components of electronics, the capacitor, the resistor, and the inductor correspond to the three ideal passive energy components of economics called the pure industries of capital, goods, and services, respectively.

Economic capacitance represents the storage of capital in one form or another.
Economic conductance represents the level of conductance of materials for the production of goods.
Economic inductance represents the inertia of economic value in motion. This is a population phenomenon known as services.

Economic Inductance

An electrical inductor (e.g., a coil or wire) has an electric current as its primary phenomenon and a magnetic field as its secondary phenomenon (inertia). Corresponding to this, an economic inductor has a flow of economic value as its primary phenomenon and a population field as its secondary field phenomenon of inertia. When the flow of economic value (e.g., money) diminishes, the human population field collapses in order to keep the economic value (money) flowing (extreme case - war).

This public inertia is a result of consumer buying habits, expected standard of living, etc., and is generally a phenomenon of self-preservation.

Inductive Factors to Consider

Population
Magnitude of the economic activities of the government
The method of financing these government activities (See Peter-Paul Principle - inflation of the currency.)

Translation

(a few examples will be given.)

Charge: coulombs; dollars (1939).
Flow/Current: amperes (coulombs per second); dollars of flow per year.
Motivating Force: volts; dollars (output) demand.
Conductance: amperes per volt; dollars of flow per year per dollar demand.
Capacitance: coulombs per volt; dollars of production inventory/stock per dollar demand.

An ideal industry may be symbolized electronically in various ways. The simplest way is to represent a demand by a voltage and a supply by a current. When this is done, the relationship between the two becomes what is called an admittance, which can result from three economic factors: (1) foresight flow, (2) present flow, and (3) hindsight flow.

Foresight flow is the result of that property of living entities to cause energy (food) to be stored for a period of low energy (e.g., a winter season). It consists of demands made upon an economic system for that period of low energy (winter season).
In a production industry it takes several forms, one of which is known as production stock or inventory. In electronic symbology this specific industry demand (a pure capital industry) is represented by capacitance and the stock or resource is represented by a stored charge. Satisfaction of an industry demand suffers a lag because of the loading effect of inventory priorities.
Present flow ideally involves no delays. It is, so to speak, input today for output today, a "hand to mouth" flow. In electronic symbology, this specific industry demand (a pure us industry) is represented by a conductance which is then a simple economic valve (a dissipative element).
Hindsight flow is known as habit or inertia. In electronics this phenomenon is the characteristic of an inductor (economic analog = a pure service industry) in which a current flow (economic analog = flow of money) creates a magnetic field (economic analog = active human population) which, if the current (money flow) begins to diminish, collapse (war) to maintain the current (flow of money - energy).
Other large alternatives to war as economic inductors or economic flywheels are an open-ended social welfare program, or an enormous (but fruitful) open-ended space program.
The problem with stabilizing the economic system is that there is too much demand on account of (1) too much greed and (2) too much population.
This creates excessive economic inductance which can only be balanced with economic capacitance (true resources or value - e.g., in goods or services).
The social welfare program is nothing more than an open-ended credit balance system which creates a false capital industry to give nonproductive people a roof over their heads and food in their stomachs. This can be useful, however, because the recipients become state property in return for the "gift," a standing army for the elite. For he who pays the piper picks the tune.
Those who get hooked on the economic drug, must go to the elite for a fix. In this, the method of introducing large amounts of stabilizing capacitance is by borrowing on the future "credit" of the world. This is a fourth law of motion - onset, and consists of performing an action and leaving the system before the reflected reaction returns to the point of action - a delayed reaction.
The means of surviving the reaction is by changing the system before the reaction can return. By this means, politicians become more popular in their own time and the public pays later. In fact, the measure of such a politician is the delay time.
The same thing is achieved by a government by printing money beyond the limit of the gross national product, and economic process called inflation. This puts a large quantity of money into the hands of the public and maintains a balance against their greed, creates a false self-confidence in them and, for awhile, stays the wolf from the door.
They must eventually resort to war to balance the account, because war ultimately is merely the act of destroying the creditor, and the politicians are the publicly hired hit men that justify the act to keep the responsibility and blood off the public conscience. (See section on consent factors and social-economic structuring.)
If the people really cared about their fellow man, they would control their appetites (greed, procreation, etc.) so that they would not have to operate on a credit or welfare social system which steals from the worker to satisfy the bum.
Since most of the general public will not exercise restraint, there are only two alternatives to reduce the economic inductance of the system.
1. Let the populace bludgeon each other to death in war, which will only result in a total destruction of the living earth.
2. Take control of the world by the use of economic "silent weapons" in a form of "quiet warfare" and reduce the economic inductance of the world to a safe level by a process of benevolent slavery and genocide.
The latter option has been taken as the obviously better option. At this point it should be crystal clear to the reader why absolute secrecy about the silent weapons is necessary. The general public refuses to improve its own mentality and its faith in its fellow man. It has become a herd of proliferating barbarians, and, so to speak, a blight upon the face of the earth.
They do not care enough about economic science to learn why they have not been able to avoid war despite religious morality, and their religious or self-gratifying refusal to deal with earthly problems renders the solution of the earthly problem unreachable to them.
It is left to those few who are truly willing to think and survive as the fittest to survive, to solve the problem for themselves as the few who really care. Otherwise, exposure of the silent weapon would destroy our only hope of preserving the seed of the future true humanity.
Industry Equivalent Circuits
The industry 'Q' can be given a block symbol as follows:
Terminals #1 through #m are connected directly to the outputs of industries #1 and #m, respectively.
The equivalent circuit of industry 'Q' is given as follows:

Characteristics:
All inputs are at zero volts.
A - Amplifier - causes output current I_Q to be represented by a voltage E_Q. Amplifier delivers sufficient current at E_Q to drive all loads Y₁₀ through Y_mQ and sink all currents i_1Q through i_mQ.
The unit transconductance amplifier A_Q is constructed as follows:

* Arrow denotes the direction of the flow of capital, goods, and services. The total demand is given as E_Q, where E_Q=I_Q.

The coupling network Y_PQ symbolizes the demand which industry Q makes on industry P. the connective admittance Y_PQ is called the 'technical coefficient' of the industry Q stating the demand of industry Q, called the industry of use, for the output in capital, goods, or services of industry P called the industry of origin.
The flow of commodities from industry P to industry Q is given by i_PQ evaluated by the formula:
i_PQ = Y_PQ* E_Q.
When the admittance Y_PQ is a simple conductance, this formula takes on the common appearance of Ohm's Law,
i_PQ = g_PQ* I_Q.
The interconnection of a three industry system can be diagrammed as follows. The blocks of the industry diagram can be opened up revealing the technical coefficients, and a much simpler format. The equations of flow are given as follows:

Stages of Schematic Simplification

Generalization

All of this may now be summarized.
Let I_j represent the output of industry j, and
- i_jk, the amount of the product of industry j absorbed annually by industry k, and
- i_jo, the amount of the same product j made available for 'outside' use. Then
Substituting the technical coefficiences, y_jk
which is the general equation of every admittance in the industry circuit.
Final Bill of Goods

is called the final bill of goods or the bill of final demand, and is zero when the system can be closed by the evaluation of the technical coefficients of the 'non-productive' industries, government and households. Households may be regarded as a productive industry with labor as its output product.
The Technical Coefficients
The quantities y_jk are called the technical coefficients of the industrial system. They are admittances and can consist of any combination of three passive parameters, conductance, capacitance, and inductance. Diodes are used to make the flow unidirectional and point against the flow.
- g_jk = economic conductance, absorption coefficient
- y_jk = economic capacitance, capital coefficient
- L_jk = economic inductance, human activity coefficient
Types of Admittances

The Household Industry
The industries of finance (banking), manufacturing, and government, real counterparts of the pure industries of capital, goods, and services, are easily defined because they are generally logically structured. Because of this their processes can be described mathematically and their technical coefficients can be easily deduced. This, however, is not the case with the service industry known as the household industry.
Household Models
When the industry flow diagram is represented by a 2-block system of households on the right and all other industries on the left, the following results:
The arrows from left to right labeled A, B, C, etc., denote flow of economic value from the industries in the left hand block to the industry in the right hand block called 'households'. These may be thought of as the monthly consumer flows of the following commodities. A - alcoholic beverages, B - beef, C - coffee, . . . . , U - unknown, etc. . .
The problem which a theoretical economist faces is that the consumer preferences of any household is not easily predictable and the technical coefficients of any one household tend to be a nonlinear, very complex, and variable function of income, prices, etc.
Computer information derived from the use of the universal product code in conjuction with credit-card purchase as an individual household identifier could change this state of affairs, but the U.P.C. method is not yet available on a national or even a significant regional scale. To compensate for this data deficiency, an alternate indirect approach of analysis has been adopted known as economic shock testing. This method, widely used in the aircraft manufacturing industry, develops an aggregate statistical sort of data.
Applied to economics, this means that all of the households in one region or in the whole nation are studied as a group or class rather than individually, and the mass behavior rather than the individual behavior is used to discover useful estimates of the technical coefficients governing the economic structure of the hypothetical single-household industry.
Notice in the industry flow diagram that the values for the flows A, B, C, etc. are accessible to measurement in terms of selling prices and total sales of commodities.
One method of evaluating the technical coefficients of the household industry depends upon shocking the prices of a commodity and noting the changes in the sales of all of the commodities.
Economic Shock Testing
In recent times, the application of Operations Research to the study of the public economy has been obvious for anyone who understands the principles of shock testing.
In the shock testing of an aircraft airframe, the recoil impulse of firing a gun mounted on that airframe causes shock waves in that structure which tell aviation engineers the conditions under which some parts of the airplane or the whole airplane or its wings will start to vibrate or flutter like a guitar string, a flute reed, or a tuning fork, and disintegrate or fall apart in flight.
Economic engineers achieve the same result in studying the behavior of the economy and the consumer public by carefully selecting a staple commodity such as beef, coffee, gasoline, or sugar, and then causing a sudden change or shock in its price or availability, thus kicking everybody's budget and buying habits out of shape.
They then observe the shock waves which result by monitoring the changes in advertising, prices, and sales of that and other commodities.
The objective of such studies is to acquire the know-how to set the public economy into a predictable state of motion or change, even a controlled self-destructive state of motion which will convince the public that certain "expert" people should take control of the money system and reestablish security (rather than liberty and justice) for all. When the subject citizens are rendered unable to control their financial affairs, they, of course, become totally enslaved, a source of cheap labor.
Not only the prices of commodities, but also the availability of labor can be used as the means of shock testing. Labor strikes deliver excellent tests shocks to an economy, especially in the critical service areas of trucking (transportation), communication, public utilities (energy, water, garbage collection), etc.
By shock testing, it is found that there is a direct relationship between the availability of money flowing in an economy and the real psychological outlook and response of masses of people dependent upon that availability.
For example, there is a measurable quantitative relationship between the price of gasoline and the probability that a person would experience a headache, feel a need to watch a violent movie, smoke a cigarette, or go to a tavern for a mug of beer.
It is most interesting that, by observing and measuring the economic models by which the public tries to run from their problems and escape from reality, and by applying the mathematical theory of Operations Research, it is possible to program computers to predict the most probable combination of created events (shocks) which will bring about a complete control and subjugation of the public through a subversion of the public economy (by shaking the plum tree).
Introduction to the Theory of Economic Shock Testing
Let the prices and total sales of commodities be given and symbolized as follows:

Commodities Price Function Total Sales

alcoholic beverages A _A

beef B _B

coffee C _C

gasoline G _G

sugar S _S

tobacco T _T

unknown balance U _U

Let us assume a simple economic model in which the total number of important (staple) commodities are represented as beef, gasoline, and an aggregate of all other staple commodities which we will call the hypothetical miscellaneous staple commodity 'M' (e.g., M is an aggregate of C, S, T, U, etc.).
Example of Shock Testing
Assume that the total sales, P, of petroleum products can be described by the linear function of the quantities B, G, and M, which are functions of the prices of those respective commodities. P = a_PG B + a_PG G + a_PM M
Then where B, G, and M are functions of the prices of beef, gasoline, and miscellaneous, respectively, and a_PB, a_PG, and a_PM are constant coefficients defining the amount by which each of the functions B, G, and M affect the sales, P, of petroleum products. We are assuming that B, G, and M are variables independent of each other.
If the availability or price of gasoline is suddenly changed, then G must be replaced by G + G. This causes a change in the petroleum sales from P to P + P. Also we will assume that B and M remain constant when G changes to G + G.
(P + P) = a_PB B + a_PG (G + G) + a_PMM.
Expanding upon this expression, we get
P + P = a_PB B + a_PG G + a_PG G + a_PM M
and subtracting the original value of P we get for the change in P
Change in P = P = a_PG G
Dividing by G we get
a_PG = P / G .

This is a rate of change in P due only to an isolated change in G, G.
In general, a_jk is the partial rate of change in the sales effect j due to a change in the causal price function of commodity k. If the interval of time were infinitesimal, this expression would be reduced to the definition of the total differential of a function, P.

When the price of gasoline is shocked, all of the coefficients with round G (2G) in the denominator are evaluated at the same time. If B, G, and M were independent, and sufficient for description of the economy, then three shock tests would be necessary to evaluate the system.
There are other factors which may be represented the same way.
For example, the tendency of a docile sub-nation to withdraw under economic pressure may be given by
where G is the price of gasoline, W_P is the dollars spent per unit time (referenced to say 1939) for war production during 'peace' time, etc. These quantities are presented to a computer in matrix format as follows:
and

X₁ = G Y₁ = P - K_P

X₂ = B Y₂ = F - K_F

X₃ = etc. Y₃ = etc.

Finally, inverting this matrix, i.e., solving for the X_k terms of the Y_j, we get, say,
[b_kj] [Y_j ] = [X_k] .
This is the result into which we substitute to get that set of conditions of prices of commodities, bad news on TV, etc., which will deliver a collapse of public morale ripe for take over.
Once the economic price and sales coefficients a_jk and b_kj are determined, they may be translated into the technical supply and demand coefficients g_jk, C_jk, and 1/L_jk.
Shock testing of a given commodity is then repeated to get the time rate of change of these technical coefficients.
Introduction to Economic Amplifiers
Economic amplifiers are the active components of economic engineering. The basic characteristic of any amplifier (mechanical, electrical, or economic) is that it receives an input control signal and delivers energy from an independent energy source to a specified output terminal in a predictable relationship to that input control signal.
The simplest form of an economic amplifier is a device called advertising.
If a person is spoken to by a T.V. advertiser as if he were a twelve-year-old, then, due to suggestibility, he will, with a certain probability, respond or react to that suggestion with the uncritical response of a twelve-year-old and will reach into his economic reservoir and deliver its energy to but that product on impulse when he passes it in the store.
An economic amplifier may have several inputs and output. Its response might be instantaneous or delayed. Its circuit symbol might be a rotary switch if its options are exclusive, qualitative, "go" or "no-go", or it might have its parametric input/output relationships specified by a matrix with internal energy sources represented.
Whatever its form might be, its purpose is to govern the flow of energy from a source to an output sink in direct relationship to an input control signal. For this reason, it is called an active circuit element or component.
Economic Amplifiers fall into classes called strategies, and, in comparison with electronic amplifiers, the specific internal functions of an economic amplifier are called logistical instead of electrical.
Therefore, economic amplifiers not only deliver power gain but also, in effect, are used to cause changes in the economic circuitry.
In the design of an economic amplifier we must have some idea of at least five functions, which are:
1. the available input signals
2. the desired output-control objectives,
3. the strategic objective,
4. the available economic power sources,
5. the logistical options.
The process of defining and evaluating these factors and incorporating the economic amplifier into an economic system has been popularly called game theory.
The design of an economic amplifier begins with a specification of the power level of the output, which can range from personal to national. The second condition is accuracy of response, i.e., how accurately the output action is a function of the input commands. High gain combined with strong feedback helps to deliver the required precision.
Most of the error will be in the input data signal. Personal input data tends to be specified, while national input data tends to be statistical.
Short List of Inputs
Questions to be answered:
- what
- where
- why
- when
- how
- who
General sources of information:
- telephone taps
- analysis of garbage
- surveillance
- behavior of children in school
Standard of living by:
- food
- shelter
- clothing
- transportation
Social contacts:
- telephone - itemized record of calls
- family - marriage certificates, birth certificates, etc.
- friends, associates, etc.
- memberships in organizations
- political affiliation
The Personal Paper Trail
Personal buying habits, i.e., personal consumer preferences:
- checking accounts
- credit-card purchases
- "tagged" credit-card purchases - the credit-card purchase of products bearing the U.P.C. (Universal Product Code)
Assets:
- checking accounts
- savings accounts
- real estate
- business
- automobile, etc.
- safety deposit at bank
- stock market
Liabilities:
- creditors
- enemies (see - legal)
- loans
Government sources (ploys)*:
- Welfare
- Social Security
- U.S.D.A. surplus food
- doles
- grants
- subsidies
* Principle of this ploy -- the citizen will almost always make the collection of information easy if he can operate on the "free sandwich principle" of "eat now, and pay later."
Government sources (via intimidation):
- Internal Revenue Service
- OSHA
- Census
- etc.
Other government sources -- surveillance of U.S. mail.
Habit Patterns -- Programming
Strengths and weaknesses:
- activities (sports, hobbies, etc.)
- see "legal" (fear, anger, etc. -- crime record)
- hospital records (drug sensitivities, reaction to pain, etc.)
- psychiatric records (fears, angers, disgusts, adaptability, reactions to stimuli, violence, suggestibility or hypnosis, pain, pleasure, love, and sex)
Methods of coping -- of adaptability -- behavior:
- consumption of alcohol
- consumption of drugs
- entertainment
- religious factors influencing behavior
- other methods of escaping from reality
Payment modus operandi (MO) -- pay on time, etc.:
- payment of telephone bills
- energy purchases
- water purchases
- repayment of loans
- house payments
- automobile payments
- payments on credit cards
Political sensitivity:
- beliefs
- contacts
- position
- strengths/weaknesses
- projects/activities
Legal inputs -- behavioral control (Excuses for investigation, search, arrest, or employment of force to modify behavior)
- court records
- police records -- NCIC
- driving record
- reports made to police
- insurance information
- anti-establishment acquaintances
National Input Information
Business sources (via I.R.S., etc):
- prices of commodities
- sales
- investments in
  - stocks/inventory
  - production tools and machinery
  - buildings and improvements
  - the stock market
Banks and credit bureaus:
- credit information
- payment information
Miscellaneous sources:
- polls and surveys
- publications
- telephone records
- energy and utility purchases
Short List of Outputs
Outputs -- create controlled situations -- manipulation of the economy, hence society -- control by control of compensation and income.
Sequence:
1. allocates opportunities.
2. destroys opportunities.
3. controls the economic environment.
4. controls the availability of raw materials.
5. controls capital.
6. controls bank rates.
7. controls the inflation of the currency.
8. controls the possession of property.
9. controls industrial capacity.
10. controls manufacturing.
11. controls the availability of goods (commodities).
12. controls the prices of commodities.
13. controls services, the labor force, etc.
14. controls payments to government officials.
15. controls the legal functions.
16. controls the personal data files -- uncorrectable by the party slandered.
17. controls advertising.
18. controls media contact.
19. controls material available for T.V. viewing
20. disengages attention from real issues.
21. engages emotions.
22. creates disorder, chaos, and insanity.
23. controls design of more probing tax forms.
24. controls surveillance.
25. controls the storage of information.
26. develops psychological analyses and profiles of individuals.
27. controls legal functions [repeat of 15]
28. controls sociological factors.
29. controls health options.
30. preys on weakness.
31. cripples strengths.
32. leaches wealth and substance.
Table of Strategies
```
  Do this:                        To get this:    Keep the public ignorant        Less public organization    Maintain access to control      Required reaction to outputs (prices,  points for feedback             sales)    Create preoccupation            Lower defenses    Attack the family unit          Control of the education of the young    Give less cash and more         More self-indulgence and more data  credit and doles    Attack the privacy              Destroy faith in this sort of  of the church                   government    Social conformity               Computer programming simplicity    Minimize the tax protest        Maximum economic data, minimum                                   enforcement problems    Stabilize the consent           Simplicity coefficients    Tighten control of variables    Simpler computer input data --                                   greater predictability    Establish boundary              Problem simplicity / solutions of  conditions                      differential and difference equations    Proper timing                   Less data shift and blurring    Maximize control                Minimum resistance to control    Collapse of currency            Destroy the faith of the American                                   people in each other.  
```
Diversion, the Primary Strategy
Experience has prevent that the simplest method of securing a silent weapon and gaining control of the public is to keep the public undisciplined and ignorant of the basic system principles on the one hand, while keeping them confused, disorganized, and distracted with matters of no real importance on the other hand.
This is achieved by:
- disengaging their minds; sabotaging their mental activities; providing a low-quality program of public education in mathematics, logic, systems design and economics; and discouraging technical creativity.
- engaging their emotions, increasing their self-indulgence and their indulgence in emotional and physical activities, by:
  - unrelenting emotional affrontations and attacks (mental and emotional rape) by way of constant barrage of sex, violence, and wars in the media - especially the T.V. and the newspapers.
  - giving them what they desire - in excess - "junk food for thought" - and depriving them of what they really need.
- rewriting history and law and subjecting the public to the deviant creation, thus being able to shift their thinking from personal needs to highly fabricated outside priorities.
These preclude their interest in and discovery of the silent weapons of social automation technology.
The general rule is that there is a profit in confusion; the more confusion, the more profit. Therefore, the best approach is to create problems and then offer solutions.
Diversion Summary
Media: Keep the adult public attention diverted away from the real social issues, and captivated by matters of no real importance.
Schools: Keep the young public ignorant of real mathematics, real economics, real law, and real history.
Entertainment: Keep the public entertainment below a sixth-grade level.
Work: Keep the public busy, busy, busy, with no time to think; back on the farm with the other animals.
Consent, the Primary Victory
A silent weapon system operates upon data obtained from a docile public by legal (but not always lawful) force. Much information is made available to silent weapon systems programmers through the Internal Revenue Service. (See Studies in the Structure of the American Economy for an I.R.S. source list.)
This information consists of the enforced delivery of well-organized data contained in federal and state tax forms, collected, assembled, and submitted by slave labor provided by taxpayers and employers.
Furthermore, the number of such forms submitted to the I.R.S. is a useful indicator of public consent, an important factor in strategic decision making. Other data sources are given in the Short List of Inputs.
Consent Coefficients - numerical feedback indicating victory status. Psychological basis: When the government is able to collect tax and seize private property without just compensation, it is an indication that the public is ripe for surrender and is consenting to enslavement and legal encroachment. A good and easily quantified indicator of harvest time is the number of public citizens who pay income tax despite an obvious lack of reciprocal or honest service from the government.
Amplification Energy Sources
The next step in the process of designing an economic amplifier is discovering the energy sources. The energy sources which support any primitive economic system are, of course, a supply of raw materials, and the consent of the people to labor and consequently assume a certain rank, position, level, or class in the social structure, i.e., to provide labor at various levels in the pecking order.
Each class, in guaranteeing its own level of income, controls the class immediately below it, hence preserves the class structure. This provides stability and security, but also government from the top.
As time goes on and communication and education improve, the lower-class elements of the social labor structure become knowledgeable and envious of the good things that the upper-class members have. They also begin to attain a knowledge of energy systems and the ability to enforce their rise through the class structure.
This threatens the sovereignty of the elite.
If this rise of the lower classes can be postponed long enough, the elite can achieve energy dominance, and labor by consent no longer will hold a position of an essential energy source.
Until such energy dominance is absolutely established, the consent of people to labor and let others handle their affairs must be taken into consideration, since failure to do so could cause the people to interfere in the final transfer of energy sources to the control of the elite.
It is essential to recognize that at this time, public consent is still an essential key to the release of energy in the process of economic amplification.
Therefore, consent as an energy release mechanism will now be considered.
Logistics
The successful application of a strategy requires a careful study of inputs, outputs, the strategy connecting the inputs and the outputs, and the available energy sources to fuel the strategy. This study is called logistics.
A logistical problem is studied at the elementary level first, and then levels of greater complexity are studied as a synthesis of elementary factors.
This means that a given system is analyzed, i.e., broken down into its subsystems, and these in turn are analyzed, until by this process, one arrives at the logistical "atom," the individual.
This is where the process of synthesis propery begins, at the time of birth of the individual.
The Artificial Womb
From the time a person leaves its mother's womb, its every effort is directed towards building, maintaining, and withdrawing into artificial wombs, various sorts of substitute protective devices or shells.
The objective of these artificial wombs is to provide a stable environment for both stable and unstable activity; to provide a shelter for the evolutionary processes of growth and maturity - i.e., survival; to provide security for freedom and to provide defensive protection for offensive activity.
This is equally true of both the general public and the elite. However, there is a definite difference in the way each of these classes go about the solution of problems.
The Political Structure of a Nation - Dependency
The primary reason why the individual citizens of a country create a political structure is a subconscious wish or desire to perpetuate their own dependency relationship of childhood. Simply put, they want a human god to eliminate all risk from their life, pat them on the head, kiss their bruises, put a chicken on every dinner table, clothe their bodies, tuck them into bed at night, and tell them that everything will be alright when they wake up in the morning.
This public demand is incredible, so the human god, the politician, meets incredibility with incredibility by promising the world and delivering nothing. So who is the bigger liar? the public? or the "godfather"?
This public behavior is surrender born of fear, laziness, and expediency. It is the basis of the welfare state as a strategic weapon, useful against a disgusting public.
Action/Offense
Most people want to be able to subdue and/or kill other human beings which disturb their daily lives, but they do not want to have to cope with the moral and religious issues which such an overt act on their part might raise. Therefore, they assign the dirty work to others (including their own children) so as to keep the blood off their hands. They rave about the humane treatment of animals and then sit down to a delicious hamburger from a whitewashed slaughterhouse down the street and out of sight. But even more hypocritical, they pay taxes to finance a professional association of hit men collectively called politicians, and then complain about corruption in government.
Responsibility
Again, most people want to be free to do the things (to explore, etc.) but they are afraid to fail.
The fear of failure is manifested in irresponsibility, and especially in delegating those personal responsibilities to others where success is uncertain or carries possible or created liabilities (law) which the person is not prepared to accept. They want authority (root word - "author"), but they will not accept responsibility or liability. So they hire politicians to face reality for them.
Summary
The people hire the politicians so that the people can:
- obtain security without managing it.
- obtain action without thinking about it.
- inflict theft, injury, and death upon others without having to contemplate either life or death.
- avoid responsibility for their own intentions.
- obtain the benefits of reality and science without exerting themselves in the discipline of facing or learning either of these things.
They give the politicians the power to create and manage a war machine to:
- provide for the survival of the nation/womb.
- prevent encroachment of anything upon the nation/womb.
- destroy the enemy who threatens the nation/womb.
- destroy those citizens of their own country who do not conform for the sake of stability of the nation/womb.
Politicians hold many quasi-military jobs, the lowest being the police which are soldiers, the attorneys and C.P.A.s next who are spies and saboteurs (licensed), and the judges who shout orders and run the closed union military shop for whatever the market will bear. The generals are industrialists. The "presidential" level of commander-in-chief is shared by the international bankers. The people know that they have created this farce and financed it with their own taxes (consent), but they would rather knuckle under than be the hypocrite.
Thus, a nation becomes divided into two very distinct parts, a docile sub-nation [great silent majority] and a political sub-nation. The political sub-nation remains attached to the docile sub-nation, tolerates it, and leaches its substance until it grows strong enough to detach itself and then devour its parent.
System Analysis
In order to make meaningful computerized economic decisions about war, the primary economic flywheel, it is necessary to assign concrete logistical values to each element of the war structure - personnel and material alike.
This process begins with a clear and candid description of the subsystems of such a structure.
The Draft (As military service)
Few efforts of human behavior modification are more remarkable or more effective than that of the socio-military institution known as the draft. A primary purpose of a draft or other such institution is to instill, by intimidation, in the young males of a society the uncritical conviction that the government is omnipotent. He is soon taught that a prayer is slow to reverse what a bullet can do in an instant. Thus, a man trained in a religious environment for eighteen years of his life can, by this instrument of the government, be broken down, be purged of his fantasies and delusions in a matter of mere months. Once that conviction is instilled, all else becomes easy to instill.
Even more interesting is the process by which a young man's parents, who purportedly love him, can be induced to send him off to war to his death. Although the scope of this work will not allow this matter to be expanded in full detail, nevertheless, a coarse overview will be possible and can serve to reveal those factors which must be included in some numerical form in a computer analysis of social and war systems.
We begin with a tentative definition of the draft.
The draft (selective service, etc.) is an institution of compulsory collective sacrifice and slavery, devised by the middle-aged and elderly for the purpose of pressing the young into doing the public dirty work. It further serves to make the youth as guilty as the elders, thus making criticism of the elders by the youth less likely (Generational Stabilizer). It is marketed and and sold to the public under the label of "patriotic = national" service.
Once a candid economic definition of the draft is achieved, that definition is used to outline the boundaries of a structure called a Human Value System, which in turn is translated into the terms of game theory. The value of such a slave laborer is given in a Table of Human Values, a table broken down into categories by intellect, experience, post-service job demand, etc.
Some of these categories are ordinary and can be tentatively evaluated in terms of the value of certain jobs for which a known fee exists. Some jobs are harder to value because they are unique to the demands of social subversion, for an extreme example: the value of a mother's instruction to her daughter, causing that daughter to put certain behavioral demands upon a future husband ten or fifteen years hence; thus, by suppressing his resistance to a perversion of a government, making it easier for a banking cartel to buy the State of New York in, say, twenty years.
Such a problem leans heavily upon the observations and data of wartime espionage and many types of psychological testing. But crude mathematical models (algorithms, etc.) can be devised, if not to predict, at least to predeterminate these events with maximum certainty. What does not exist by natural cooperation is thus enhanced by calculated compulsion. Human beings are machines, levers which may be grasped and turned, and there is little real difference between automating a society and automating a shoe factory.
These derived values are variable. (It is necessary to use a current Table of Human Values for computer analysis.) These values are given in true measure rather than U.S. dollars, since the latter is unstable, being presently inflated beyond the production of national goods and services so as to give the economy a false kinetic energy ("paper" inductance).
The silver value is stable, it being possible to buy the same amount with a gram of silver today as it could be bought in 1920. Human value measured in silver units changes slightly due to changes in production technology.
Enforcement

Factor I
As in every social system approach, stability is achieved only by understanding and accounting for human nature (action/reaction patterns). A failure to do so can be, and usually is, disastrous.
As in other human social schemes, one form or another of intimidation (or incentive) is essential to the success of the draft. Physical principles of action and reaction must be applied to both internal and external subsystems.
To secure the draft, individual brainwashing/programming and both the family unit and the peer group must be engaged and brought under control.
Factor II - Father
The man of the household must be housebroken to ensure that junior will grow up with the right social training and attitudes. The advertising media, etc., are engaged to see to it that father-to-be is pussy-whipped before or by the time he is married. He is taught that he either conforms to the social notch cut out for him or his sex life will be hobbled and his tender companionship will be zero. He is made to see that women demand security more than logical, principled, or honorable behavior.
By the time his son must go to war, father (with jelly for a backbone) will slam a gun into junior's hand before father will risk the censure of his peers, or make a hypocrite of himself by crossing the investment he has in his own personal opinion or self-esteem. Junior will go to war or father will be embarrassed. So junior will go to war, the true purpose not withstanding.
Factor III - Mother
The female element of human society is ruled by emotion first and logic second. In the battle between logic and imagination, imagination always wins, fantasy prevails, maternal instinct dominates so that the child comes first and the future comes second. A woman with a newborn baby is too starry-eyed to see a wealthy man's cannon fodder or a cheap source of slave labor. A woman must, however, be conditioned to accept the transition to "reality" when it comes, or sooner.
As the transition becomes more difficult to manage, the family unit must be carefully disintegrated, and state-controlled public education and state-operated child-care centers must be become more common and legally enforced so as to begin the detachment of the child from the mother and father at an earlier age. Inoculation of behavioral drugs [Ritalin] can speed the transition for the child (mandatory). Caution: A woman's impulsive anger can override her fear. An irate woman's power must never be underestimated, and her power over a pussy-whipped husband must likewise never be underestimated. It got women the vote in 1920.
Factor IV - Junior
The emotional pressure for self-preservation during the time of war and the self-serving attitude of the common herd that have an option to avoid the battlefield - if junior can be persuaded to go - is all of the pressure finally necessary to propel Johnny off to war. Their quiet blackmailings of him are the threats: "No sacrifice, no friends; no glory, no girlfriends."
Factor V - Sister
And what about junior's sister? She is given all the good things of life by her father, and taught to expect the same from her future husband regardless of the price.
Factor VI - Cattle
Those who will not use their brains are no better off than those who have no brains, and so this mindless school of jelly-fish, father, mother, son, and daughter, become useful beasts of burden or trainers of the same.
This concludes what is available of this document.

A HARD look at Alex Jones - Part 7

2011-09-25T07:11:00.000-07:00

PNN
September 25, 2011

Here is a MYSTERY SCHOOL speech with which Alex Jones herds his sheeple listeners into the New Age Order…

This vid was first posted on September 21, 2010, around the FALL EQUINOX and now, one year later, it is re-appearing around the FALL EQUINOX on the main page of Alex Jones' Info-wars site…

In it, he glamorizes the new evolution of the COLLECTIVE human species while minimizing the extinction of the INDIVIDUAL. It has references to the "decadent masses" and to "genetic, racial memories," from a guy who pretends to be pro-freedom but who sounds more like a National Socialist/Marxist/Communist.

CONSERVATIVES SHOULD BE WARY OF "SLICK RICK" PERRY!

2011-09-14T22:44:00.000-07:00

RPWR
September 15, 2011

This website is not in any way affiliated with the official Ron Paul 2012 campaign.

Perry wasn't always the "gun slinging" Texas cowboy. Long before Perry created his phony macho image, he was a male cheerleader at Texas A&M in the 1960's.

Perry is not now, and never was, all that bright. His college transcripts are full of C's and D's. He received a "D" in Economics!

A lifelong Democrat, Perry supported Jimmy Carter over Ronald Reagan in the critical 1980 election.

1984: In spite of Reagan's economic miracle, Democrat Perry again rejected Ronald Reagan and was elected to the Texas State legislature with Ultra-Liberal Walter Mondale leading the National Democrat ticket. Reagan was reelected in a landslide with the support of even many Democrats, BUT NOT RICK PERRY'S!

In 1987, liberal Democrat Perry voted for a 5.7 billion dollar tax increase!

In 1988, Perry was Texas campaign manager for Al Gore's presidential run. Perry then backed super liberal Michael Dukakis in the General Election.

When it became obvious that being a Democrat in conservative Texas was a career killer, the opportunistic and ambitious Perry switched to the Republican Party in 1990. The liberal Democrat college cheerleader cleverly transformed his image into a tough talking, gun slinging Texas cowboy.

"I intend to vote the same convictions," Perry said. "The only difference is that there will be an "R" next to my name."

http://www.star-telegram.com/2011/07/15/3224994/rick-perry-began-political-career.html#ixzz1WcvfhDb

Now Agriculture Commissioner, in 1993 Perry praised Hillary Clinton's socialized health care scheme,describing it as "most commendable."

At a "border summit" with Mexican President Vicente Fox in 2001, Perry bragged about increasing Medicaid spending for immigrants in Texas. He also proposed the possibility of "Bi-National" health insurance:

"Mexican and U.S. sides of the border compose one region, and we must address health care problems throughout that region. That's why I am also excited that Texas Secretary of State Henry Cuellar is working on an initiative that could extend the benefits of telemedicine to individuals living on the Mexican side of the border. (Full article here!)

Perry spoke before the radical left wing NCLR (National Council of La Raza). La Raza ("The Race") promotes open borders and welfare for illegals. Perry told La Raza that he opposes border fences and is against Arizona's anti-illegal immigration law.

Perry cooperated with the radical Marxist group, ACORN. ACORN is the same red-shirt group that spawned "community organizer" Barack Obama. ACORN was under investigation for vote fraud in several states until Obama came to their rescue.

In 2007, Perry signed an Executive Order mandating that every 6th grade girl submit to a 3-jab regimen of a vaccine for sexually transmitted diseases (Gardasil).

Parents were outraged! The drug was developed by Merck, a contributor to Rick Perry! The tyrannical mandate was later repealed by the Texas legislature, over Perry's objections!

In 2008, Perry wrote letters to U.S. Congressional leaders in support of the criminal Wall Street banker bailout. By doing so, Perry ignored the wishes of the American people and aligned himself with Billionaire liberals like George Soros and Warren Buffet.

Perry is a Big Government liberal! In 10 years as Governor, he nearly doubled the size of the Texas budget while tripling its debt! From 2000-2011, Texas has had an increase in state workers of 14%, a net gain of 48,800 state jobs!

When it came to opposing the TSA's "porno scanners" and invasive crotch & breast pat downs, Perry talked a good game. But when the Texas legislature aimed to courageously confront the Federal Government's airport abuse of innocent Americans, Perry deliberately stalled and allowed an anti-groping bill die!

Big Liberal Media is promoting Perry! The elite liberals hype Perry's candidacy while at the same time "attacking" him just enough to give him credibility among conservatives. This clever tactic is known as "sheep dipping" (as in a wolf in sheep's clothing).

"Conservative Cowboy" Perry shows off his boots on Newsweek Magazine. "Look at me everybody! I'm a tough Texas Cowboy. See...I even wear boots!"

Rick Perry talks a good game about "States' Rights", but in reality, he is not a supporter of State's Rights at all! To the contrary, Perry is a dedicated internationalist who has attended meetings of the influential Bildeberger Group in Europe. As described in The Drudge Report, Bildeberger is pro-socialist and anti-national sovereignty.

In order to win Christian votes, Slick Rick shamelessly wears a false Christianity "on his sleeve". His insincere public prayer spectacles call to mind a biblical warning from Jesus himself.

Matthew 6:5-6:

"And when thou prayest, thou shalt not be as the hypocrites are: for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and in the corners of the streets, that they may be seen of men....when thou prayest, enter into thy closet and when thou has shut thy door, pray to thy Father." Perry prays on a Jumbotron!

This is not in anyway intended as a condemnation of public prayer, but rather as a warning against hypocrites who misuse religion for the purpose of self promotion.

SLICK RICK PERRY:

FAKE COWBOY!
FAKE CHRISTIAN!
FAKE CONSERVATIVE!

Eco-Nazi Pt. 3 – Agenda 21, Travel Management and Local Implementation

2011-09-06T23:38:00.000-07:00

HOTT
September 06, 2011

Agenda 21 can be directly traced back to two spectrums of the government strata that are involved in the projected future of global governance and world control. There is so much evidence and so many credible people who are trying to get the word out that you must only look for it through simple searches on the subject matter.

Look for:

Agenda 21, Sustainable Development, Wildland’s Project, Project for Global Biodiversity, Conservation Strategy, Biodiversity Assessment, International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI), Environmental Assessment Guidelines (a.k.a. DEIS or EIS reports), Travel Management Plans (which is were your participation can begin)

For some great talks on the subject matter there are audio series out there to be found at (http://www.hourofthetime.com/) in the archives outlining exactly what Agenda 21 is and how you can fight back against it. Some of the more important are Allodial Titles and Land Patents, History of Property Rights series, and State Sovereignty series. Also, look for the coordination workbook, as it will be a working tool that you can carry with you in your fight. These will not only help in the way of your understanding of what Agenda 21 is but how to make you a proactive person in your area to help prevent local implementation. As you will see in this article and others they are right at your doorstep and the only way for them to succeed is if you let them in.

There will be a lot of words thrown around that sound good for people such as Sustainability, Conservation, Wildlife Protection etc, but in truth the real matter is a schism between Lockeian principles of private property and what Globalist would rather see.

What is it actually?

So what is Sustainable Development? The Sustainablists insist that society be transformed into feudal-like governance by making nature the central organizing principle for our economy and society. To achieve this, Sustainablist policy focuses on three components; global land use, global education, and global population control. Keep in mind that America is one of the only countries in the world based on the ideals of private property. But, private property is incompatible with the collectivist premise of

Sustainable Development

Quote from UN: “If you doubt that, then consider this quote from the report of the 1976 UN’s Habitat I conference which said: “Land …cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market. Private land ownership is also a principle instrument of accumulation and concentration

of wealth, therefore, contributes to social injustice.”

What does John Locke say: “”The legislature acts against the trust reposed in them, when they endeavour to invade the property of the subject, and to make themselves, or any part of the community, masters, or arbitrary disposers of the lives, liberties or fortunes of the people”. (Second Treatise, Chapter 19)

Tom Deweese wrote:

Some officials try to pretend that Sustainable Development is just a local effort to protect the environment — just your local leaders putting together a local vision for the community. Then ask your local officials how it is possible that the exact language and tactics for implementation of Sustainable Development are being used in nearly every city around the globe from Lewiston, Maine to Singapore. Local indeed, Sustainable Development is the process by which America is being reorganized around a central

principle of state collectivism using the environment as bait

The best way to understand what Sustainable Development actually is can be found by discovering what is NOT sustainable.

According to the UN’s Biodiversity Assessment Report, items for our everyday lives that are NOT sustainable include: Ski runs, grazing of livestock, plowing of soil, building fences, industry, single family homes, paved and tarred roads, logging activities, dams and reservoirs, power line construction, and economic systems that fail to set proper value on the environment (capitalism, free markets).

Maurice Strong, Secretary General of the UN’s Rio Earth Summit in 1992 said, “…Current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class – involving high meat intake, use of fossil fuels, appliances, home and work air-conditioning, and suburban housing are not sustainable.”

If you haven’t gathered the big picture that this is all a huge land and water grab by the Department of Agriculture, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), National Forest Service (NFS), National Parks Service (NPS), U.S. Forest Service (U.S.F.S), and Fish and Wildlife Service all working under U.N. implementation of Agenda 21. Then look up all of the agencies “…representatives who go to UNEP or the United Nations Environmental Program which was started back in 1973 by the UN General Council for Global Environmental implementation policies” (Deweese 1).

Also on the list of whom you should keep in mind are right at the starting floor of all the policies acting as None Governmental Organizations (NGO’s) are the Environmental Defense Fund, National Audubon Society, The Nature Conservancy, National Wildlife Federation, Zero Population growth, Planned Parenthood, the Sierra Club, the National Education Association, and hundreds more.

Local Implementation and Solution Oriented Mindset

The ways in which the plans are being brought about in this country are through our own acquiescence. With the Tenth Amendment on our side stating that “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are Reserved to the States respectively, or to the People.” They have to go through us to get to the land and water that they are attempting to control, but if you do not participate you do not have a say in what is going on. This is why they have so many different agencies and NGO’s working on the project from above and down below. They are also working through the ICLEI to get local officials to do their bidding. How local? I mean even your local City Council and Boards of Supervisors. Take a moment to go to the ICLEI website and look up if you county and city are on the list because they probably are (http://www.icleiusa.org/). This is why it is so important that you make your own voice heard. They are flooding these officials with sustainability nonsense and providing for financial incentives to those that will go along with such plans.

Travel Management Plans

The big plan and implementation is under way in the Department of Agricultures Travel Management Plans. The Travel Management Plans came into effect with the Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 216 / Wednesday, November 9, 2005 / Rules and Regulations, under CFR 212, 251, 261, and 295.What the Travel Management Plans entail, according to them, is to restructure the travel access routes throughout all of the National Forest of the nation to be better suited for environmental protection under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) which will be enforced through the National Environmental Protection Agency and the National Forest Service. They will and have been attempting to shut down “roads” and trails to better protect the endangered species and “wet lands” in your local area. This is also, limiting the access of Off Highway Vehicles (OHV) and public vehicle access. They are also working in accordance to the Wildlands Project to make areas be “Environmentally” protected. This can be seen in the clearer sense in Wilderness areas, such as, Arizona, Texas, and New Mexico’s Wilderness areas where Border Patrol Agents could not go into the protected areas even in the pursuance of suspected drug traffickers under threat of Federal Laws where they could be possibly fined and imprisoned if they do so. This is also being seen in Idaho, Wyoming, and Utah where ranchers our encountering problems with grazing areas to move their cattle on because of proposed wilderness areas.

To find the Travel Management Plans going on in your local area you must go to the Federal Register and see if they are posting any public hearings on the issue of Travel Management for National and State Parks in your area. By law they have to post the upcoming events and public hearings to be had on the issue of their proposed Travel Management Plans. When wanting to get involved they will try to convince you that they have to protect the land for endangered species and wildlands, however, under NEPA the agencies have to comply with their own regulations that must take into account the human element which ask them to “achieve a balance between population and resource use which will permit high standards of living and a wide sharing of life’s amenities…” (42 U.S.C. section 4331 subsection (b) part 5 NEPA). They cannot just account for the endangered species or the wet lands that they want to protect if there is a conflict with the human element in their plan. As stated in their own regulations “utilize a systematic, interdisciplinary approach which will insure the integrated use of the natural and social sciences and the environmental design arts in planning and in decision making which may have an impact on Man’s environment.” (U.S.C.A. section 4332 subsection (a) NEPA).

This is where the coordination process will start. Once you find the plans see how they will affect the area. Does it limit the access of fire department and law enforcement? Does it have an adverse affect on economics for Ranchers, Farmers, and Property owners? These and many other issues including states rights to water and property are all relevant in the case of the National Environmental Policy Act and most other environmental regulatory statues. Once you can establish what it is their plan is you can develop your own. Use all of the tools that have be provided for on the HOTT site, such as, Allodial Titles series, Property Rights series, and the Statehood series all of these being important in your understanding of jurisprudence and how to use it. This is one of those cases were the pen is mightier then the sword or the bullhorn. Yelling at some public official as they walk out of a restaurant or book store makes for a humorous youtube video but it will probably not do you much good and the person being verbally attacked is most likely laughing at you as he or she enters their bullet proof limousine. On the other hand if you can become adept at legalese, jurisprudence and the processes by which they use them against you, then you will most certainly become dangerous to those that wish to subvert our freedoms.

One example of the effect with the Travel Management Plans and Wildland’s projects they have been making attempts in shutting down major mining areas that will end up disrupting people’s lives and livelihood. Once such example is the Arizona Strip, were through the proposed wilderness areas they were attempting to shut down mining in the area. For those that are unaware “The Arizona Strip FO is located in northern Coconino and Mohave counties, Arizona, north of Grand Canyon National Park and contains 1,679,896 acres of BLM-administered lands, 170,165 acres of Arizona State Trust lands, and 130,962 acres of private land. The decisions in the Approved RMP only apply to the 1,679,896 acres of BLM-administered lands within the Arizona Strip FO.” (BLM Record of Decision 2008). The area is also one of the largest Uranium deposits in North America which can supply millions of pounds of uranium to United States nuclear reactors thus creating electricity and eliminating some dependence on foreign uranium. Recently Secretary of Interior Salazar has been attempting to remove public lands from mineral entry into the Arizona Strip. This despite the fact the mining areas were left out of the original Wilderness areas as described “Commissioner Alan Gardner of Washington County, Utah and cochair of the five county group, said “Congress left the “Arizona Strip” open to uranium mining when it established the Arizona and Utah wildernesses. The wilderness acts specifically left the “Strip” available for continuation of uranium mining. That was a specific part of the settlement that Congress insisted on before it would pass the Acts. So, the Secretary is trying to end-run the law that Congress passed.” (quoted in Trademark press release). This is happening despite the fact that we import 90% of our uranium from foreign countries. This is yet another egregious attempt by the Obama administration to make themselves above their own rules. Not to worry though I have it on good authority that groups in Northern Arizona and Southern Utah are working diligently to disrupt such attempts.

Aside from the larger implementations that are going on it would be wise to also become associated with all of your local officials. If you are not aware of who you Mayor, City Council, and Board of Supervisors are it would be wise to start becoming aware of these people as they too are also making decisions that will affect Agenda 21 implementation. It is much easier to get rid of your Mayors and Council members then it is to get rid of Senators and Congressmen. As an example, in my local area the Board of Supervisors has just been attempting to initiate the Initial Study and Assessment Guidelines or the ISAG guidelines. In these ISAG guidelines it requires that all types of industrial activities and residential growth have to go through these initial studies and assessment before they can make any moves towards development. They also were attempting to set aside environmental protected wetlands that were nothing more then small water areas that truly don’t need protecting. The Initial Study Assessment Guidelines (ISAG) will cover many issues such as restrictive covenant, element occurrence, linkage/Wildlife Movement Corridors and Candidate Species. Of these four topics one of the most obviously disturbing is the Linkage/Wildlife Movement Corridors. When seeing the Agenda 21 mapping system you will notice that they have to restrict access to the National parks and they also need linkage/corridor systems to connect all of these and have protection for animal movement.

This is described by the Wildlands Network website as “Just as humans use highways that span state and national boundaries for many essential purposes, wildlife needs Wild ways to travel the distances required to find a mate, to breed and to keep genetic variability strong.” There are people now who are aware of the adverse effects of these laws which are making moves to eliminate them. Some for the reason that they just want to be able to have a business open without going through this extra burdensome process. Others are against it for their agricultural and farming reasons. Not all of them see it as a big Agenda 21 take over but that doesn’t matter as long as they are willing to put in the effort to stop it their personal reasons don’t make much of a difference.

Another example of the local implementations is through state laws such as Renewable energy guidelines and cap and trade guidelines. A recent example of this is when the Sierra Club was calling on the governor Jerry Brown in California to reevaluate the Cap and Trade regulations that were occurring, because as the Sierra Club stated the old regulations that former governor Arnold Schwarzenegger “has major flaws in it that will limit the effectiveness of curbing carbon emissions and generate the flow of green jobs in accordance with the requirements of AB 32” ( Von Oot (Sacramento Bee) 1). With a bit of digging you can find out that acts like this usually fall under some type of Code in your local legislature that provide for tools for the public use, such is the case with AB 32 were I discovered that:

Accordingly the act falls under the Air Resource Boards final Resolution that was given on December 16, 2010. (under Resolution 10-42; agenda item #: 10-11-1) This act falls under the Global Warming’s Solution Act of 2006 AB 32: chapter 448, statues of 2006, Health and Safety Code subsection 38500 et seq.

In the Air Resource Boards final Resolution pg. 1 paragraph 3 it states:

Whereas to Health and Safety Code, which express the Legislation intent that Air Resource Board COORDINATE with state agencies

In California Health and Safety Code subsection 38501 (f) it states:

It is the intent of the legislature that the State Air Resource Board COORDINATE with state agencies, as well as, consult with environmental justice community, Industrial Sector, Business Groups, academic institutions, environmental organizations, and other stakeholders in implementing this division.

Also in California Health and Safety Code subsection 38501 (i) it states:

It is the intent of the Legislature that the climate Action Team established by the Governor to COORDINATE the efforts set forth under Executive Order S-3-05, continue its role in COORDINATING overall climate policy.

Executive Order S-3-5 states in section 2:

That the California Environmental Protection Agency (secretary) shall coordinate oversight of the efforts made to meet the targets with: Secretary of Business, Transportation and Housing Agency, Secretary of the Department of Food and Agriculture, Secretary of Resource Agency, Chairperson of the Air Resource Board, Chairperson of the Energy Commission, and the President of the Utilities Commission.

Not only does Executive Order of the State Governor require coordination with the CEPA secretary but as the CEPA falls under NEPA coordination is required at all levels see:

42 U.S.C. 4331 National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) subsections (a), (b) specifically.

For those who have never heard of Coordination or would like a quick review, it is defined in California Native Plant Society v. City of Rancho Cordova, 172 Cal. App. 4^Th 603, 91 Cal. Rpr. 3^rd. 571 (Third App. Dist. 2009) only equal parties coordinate. In enacting your coordination right your local government, meaning tax collecting agency, is at an even table with the agency attempting to enact any law, regulation, or rule and they shall coordinate with the party that is enacting; they shall not they may.

This meaning any plan set forth must be considered before implementation of the project any no consideration is a violation of their own State and Federal rules and regulations.

California Health and Safety Code 38562 subsection (g) also requires that:

they must do a public workshop allowing for public comment on the plan and they must post the plans for these periods on either the federal register or the state register depending on the implementation.

In the case of this California specific action it should be posted through your local official’s office or through the Capital in Sacramento.

It is definite that if you do not act on these rights the environmental groups will and they have for a number of years.

The description of the goals and ends of this legislation is presented in California Health and Safety Code 38562 subsection (a):

On or before January 1^st 2011 the state board shall adopt greenhouse gas emissions limits and emissions reduction measures by regulation to achieve the maximum technologically feasible and COST-EFFECTIVE reductions in greenhouse emissions. These measures are to be enacted by January 1^st, 2012

Another one of the most advantageous tools that can be used when getting involved is the Data Quality Act, which is also sometimes known as the Information Quality Act. The DQA basically states that “The DQA requires federal agencies to issue information quality guidelines ensuring the quality, utility, objectivity and integrity of information that they disseminate and provide mechanisms for affected persons to correct such information. It is important for natural resources and environmental attorneys to be aware of this law in the event that a client has an interest in filing a petition with an agency to challenge the quality of information it has used or disseminated” (Bisong 1). Whenever Federal agencies are moving in to do some type of action you can petition and call in the Data Quality Act and they must show you the data used to make their decisions. If they don’t give it to you they are in violation. If they used unreliable sources for their date you can challenge them on it. One of the greatest things about the DQA is that individuals can use it you do not have to be a part of any agency or local government.

These types of guidelines and local laws are going on throughout the country but the only thing that is needed for them to get passed is for us not to pay attention. When you start to see the big picture and how it is being implemented locally and nationally it becomes easier to call it for what it is. This is another step towards draconian control that is being done by the people’s acquiescence. It does not have to be that way though. By finding out who are your local officials are and getting them voted out of office if you have to you can take back local control of your area. You do not have to stop everything yourself but we can all do are part in whatever capacity that may be. Some people are good at reading through long pieces of legislation. Others are good speakers and group organizers. Whatever it is that you feel more comfortable and better at you should do because it will all contribute to regaining control of the country that should have never been lost in the first place. They expect the sheeple to be asleep and roll over, don’t be what they expect.

FEMA'S use of term 'federal family' for government expands under Obama

2011-09-06T12:01:00.000-07:00

Palm Beach Post
September 6, 2011

Don’t think of it as the federal government but as your “federal family.”

In a Category 4 torrent of official communications during the approach and aftermath of Hurricane Irene, the Federal Emergency Management Agency has repeatedly used the phrase “federal family” when describing the Obama administration’s response to the storm.

The Obama administration didn’t invent the phrase but has taken it to new heights.

“Under the direction of President Obama and Secretary Janet Napolitano, the entire federal family is leaning forward to support our state, tribal and territorial partners along the East Coast,” a FEMA news release declared Friday as Irene churned toward landfall.

The G-word — “government” — has been nearly banished, with FEMA instead referring to federal, state and local “partners” as well as “offices” and “personnel.”

“'Government’ is such a dirty word right now,” says Florida State University communication professor Davis Houck. “Part of what the federal government does and any elected official does is change the terms of the language game into terms that are favorable to them.”

“Family” can evoke favorable thoughts of motherhood and security. But it can also conjure images of Big Brother and organized crime.

The phrase “federal family” has been used in connection with FEMA at least as far back as 1999.

Under President George W. Bush, FEMA officials sprinkled the alliterative euphemism into congressional testimony and statements. When former FEMA Director Michael Brown promised help to hurricane-battered Floridians in 2004, he vowed that “the federal family is dedicated to staying for as long as it takes.”

During the Clinton administration, Vice President Al Gore responded to 1999 flooding in Iowa by pledging that “the federal family is committed to providing the necessary resources to comfort every person and family devastated by this disaster and to help them return to their normal way of living as fast as possible.”

A Google search shows the phrase appearing 10 times on FEMA’s website during the Bush years. Since Obama took office, “federal family” has turned up 118 times on fema.gov, including 50 Irene-related references.

Among them: statements that the Obama administration “is committed to bringing all of the resources of the federal family to bear” for storm assistance and that “the entire federal family continues to lean forward to support the states in their ongoing response efforts.”

Houck doubts all the “family” references will give the public a warm and fuzzy view of FEMA and the federal government.

“That one is so blatantly obvious that I think people’s rhetorical radar is going to go off,” Houck says.

On the other hand, Houck says, “If FEMA can come in and really do a great job, maybe that 'federal family’ thing would stick with the people on the ground.”

FEMA did not respond to a request for comment Wednesday.

Eco-Nazi Agenda, Pt.2: Sustainable Communities

2011-09-05T19:31:00.000-07:00

Hott
September 5, 2011

The ultimate vision for the globally managed society is what is being termed the “sustainable community”. A sustainable community is a city, town, or even a larger community that has been developed according to the standards set forth by the United Nations in Local Agenda 21. This is considered the wave of the future for development.

For a locality to be considered a sustainable community, one key element is “mixed-use development”, meaning development centered on making amenities available within the immediate area. This includes ensuring that there are available jobs for the number of people that are planned to live in a given community. The goal in mixed-use development is to keep everything a human is expected to need within walking distance. This includes work, entertainment, housing, park areas, and the like. By keeping everything within walking distance, the hope is that a reliable public transportation system will prove more than adequate for whatever travel is necessary above and beyond walking. The theory is; since cars are the primary cause for climate change, we should eliminate their private use.

The strategy for turning America (and indeed, the world) into a sustainable communisty is through the intensive use of taxes, fees, and codes. Sustainable living is considered un-attainable any other way, and major tax measures can be seen anywhere smart growth is being implemented. For example, in Victoria, British Columbia, they have adopted location-based fees as part of their “smart tax policy” to turn Victoria sustainable:

“Location-Based Fees

“The cost of providing public services such as roads, utilities, schools, emergency services tend to be lower for clustered, urban development than for more dispersed, sprawl (Land Use Evaluation). Most property taxes and fees do not reflect these location-related cost differentials, and so overcharges clustered, infill development and undercharges dispersed, exurban development. Location-based taxes and fees tends to be more equitable (it reflects the “user pays” principle) and gives consumers an incentive to choose more cost effective land use patterns.”

“Smart Tax Policies

“Some current tax policies favor suburban development over Smart Growth, by favoring lower-density development, single-family over multi-family, new construction over redevelopment of existing buildings, and development outside of urbanized areas over construction within existing urban areas (England, 2003; Slack, 2002)…

“Smart Growth tax reforms are designed to correct current tax policies that encourage sprawl, and reward more accessible, compact development, particularly to the degree that Smart Growth reduces public service costs, reduces external costs, benefits disadvantaged people, or supports other strategic planning objectives.

“Property taxes can be structured to favor more compact, infill development over sprawl in order to reflect the lower cost of providing public services within existing urban areas, the reduced per capita transport externalities generated in areas with reduced per capita vehicle travel, and strategic planning objectives such as greenspace preservation.”

http://www.vtpi.org/tdm/tdm95.htm

This same policy of taxing to regulate behavior is being used to slowly tax any land that is designated to become wilderness, in order to make it unlivable, unprofitable, and/ or uninhabitable. The plan is to force people off their land and into a sustainable community by making it unrealistically expensive to own, farm, or live on your own private property. Grants and subsidies are used to promote “smart” development in undeveloped or abandoned areas (land recycling). It is in this way that the U.N. and Federal government, under the Wildlands project (soon to be re-named), will section America up and divide it into 1.) Federally owned “wilderness” areas, surrounded by 2.) Buffer zones of limited human activity, and 3.) Sustainable communities wherever people are allowed to live.

THE PARTNERSHIP

http://www.epa.gov/smartgrowth/partnership/index.html

http://www.sustainablecommunities.gov/index.html

On June 16^th, 2009, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the U.S. Department Of Transportation (DOT), and the U.S. Department for Housing and Urban Development (HUD) formed the “Partnership for Sustainable Communities”. Simply called “The Partnership”, the sole purpose of this alliance is to restructure the country piece by piece, until all of the United States is re-built completely into “Sustainable Communities”.

The Partnership for Sustainable Communities has established 6 “livability principles” which shall act as a “foundation for coordination”. These livability principles are very vague, which seems to be a common theme for the “sustainable development” movement. However, they are descriptive enough to give you sufficient pause. And so, one by one:

“Livability Principles”

“1.) Provide more transportation choices. Develop safe, reliable, and economical transportation choices to decrease household transportation costs, reduce our nation’s dependence on foreign oil, improve air quality, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and promote public health.”

What they really mean is provide a “variety of public transportation choices” (all run by the government), and the elimination of private vehicles, as discussed. The UN says that all privately owned transportation is not sustainable. And this is where I think that many of us would have to consider the consequences of such legislation. Who wouldn’t support reliable transit, if the other side of the coin wasn’t outlawed cars? However, this movement would be the end of personal transportation. What if there was an attack, or a terrible fire, and you and your family needed to evacuate. Would you run with all your things? Are you expected to take transit in emergencies? What about just “getting away?”

“2.) Promote equitable, affordable housing. Expand location- and energy-efficient housing choices for people of all ages, incomes, races, and ethnicities to increase mobility and lower the combined cost of housing and transportation.”

Again, we must remember that what they are focusing on verbally is not the concern. The keywords here are “location efficient” (mixed-use development), “energy efficient” (government subsidized), “combined cost of housing” (sustainable apartment complexes), “and transportation” (did I mention this was all getting paid for with your money?)

Even the use of the term “equitable” is intentionally deceiving because it brings to mind thoughts of home equity. As we covered, personal property and homes are unsustainable, so you will never see a “home”, and you will never own any property you may inhabit (and pay for), so you will never be able to gain or lose equity ever. You will own nothing. These units will be owned by the state, or some other government sponsored corporation. However, the one bright spot in our lives that will come from these housing units – and it is almost worth applauding the EPA for accomplishing it – these units will… save energy!

Now that none of us have to pay for it… Oh wait, we would all be paying for it in taxes.

“3.) Enhance economic competitiveness. Improve economic competitiveness through reliable and timely access to employment centers, educational opportunities, services and other basic needs by workers, as well as expanded business access to markets.”

As was outlined earlier, the goal is to make the have available work within walking distance from their hovel. They call this “economic competitiveness”, because it will keep everyone in town with a guaranteed job. Additionally, it is expected that the IMF, World Bank, WTO, and development programs will be consolidated into a single “economic security council”, which will (supposedly) provide a substantial amount of U.N. Monopoly money for the working class slaves to buy their basic necessities with.

How can something be competitive when it has guaranteed outcomes?

“4.) Support existing communities. Target federal funding toward existing communities—through strategies like transit oriented, mixed-use development, and land recycling—to increase community revitalization and the efficiency of public works investments and safeguard rural landscapes.”

As we can see, the EPA’s idea of a re-vitalized community is a community that has become sustainable. In their minds, unless a city is re-vamped according to their version of sustainable, it is a hell hole of private use. The only vital city is a sustainable city.

There is a clear plan of attack outlined in this “principle”. The Partnership targets federal tax dollars on development in “existing communities”, and that means your community. When they say support, they are really referring to their intention to spend our federal tax dollars on subsidies to businesses and grants to NGOs and other foundations for the expressed purpose of building existing communities like yours and mine into sustainable communities. This is why we all need to get involved in this. It is happening right now.

This principle outlines their intention to focus on public transit “re-vitalization”. When the Partnership says that they are focusing their efforts on “transit oriented” strategies, they are referring to re-vamping our existing transit systems into more streamlined systems, all ultimately guided by the DOT; Federally authorized transit.

The term Land recycling means the buying up and re-purposing of any existing land that could be re-developed into a mixed-use sustainable community. This is happening with any under used land such as abandoned where houses and factories to undeveloped lots.

Safeguard rural landscapes should speak for itself. However, in case you missed the point, we are all re-organizing our societies for the sake of the untouched wilderness.

“5.) Coordinate and leverage federal policies and investment. Align federal policies and funding to remove barriers to collaboration, leverage funding, and increase the accountability and effectiveness of all levels of government to plan for future growth, including making smart energy choices such as locally generated renewable energy”

The usual barriers to collaboration are the people whose homes and lives are planted sfficiently in the ground wherever sustainable development is being adopted. In the classic local planning process, endless meetings would follow endless meetings to ultimately come to conclusions that were of little or no consequence. Local processes are being actively subverted in order to prevent this sort of “gridlock”. By using funding (taxes) the Partnership can add the necessary incentive to build or re-develop, or they can invest in foundations and NGOs.

“6.) Value communities and neighborhoods. Enhance the unique characteristics of all communities by investing in healthy, safe, and walkable neighborhoods—rural, urban, or suburban.”

There will be three different versions of the sustainable communities. There will be common and recognizable community themes such as rural, urban, and suburban. Price brackets and designs will range from high end, mid range, and of course low income. The price will, of course, be location appropriate, but that will not matter since the jobs will be location specific as well. All the CEOs can live and work in the mountains while the rabble can work in the environmentally friendly apartments and townhouses. Plastic Utopia.

WHAT CAN I DO?

The first thing that we need to all start doing is getting familiar with our local officials, agencies, and governments. Unlike many other national takeovers, Sustainable Development is happening on the ground floor, county by county. This means that you can and do have the opportunity to stop this in its tracks right where you live.

But what do I do? Many of us are intimidated by our own lack of familiarity with the civil process, and don’t want to get caught off guard or waste a good opportunity. The good news, ladies and gentlemen, is that there is a process built right into the legal language of the very environmental programs that are geared toward protection.

There is a process called “COORDINATION”, which is REQUIRED by many Federal agencies, including the EPA. This is a very specific process which puts local governments at an equal footing with the Federal government. To simplify this process, let’s look at the definitions, specifically at how coordination differs from “consultation”, or “cooperation”. “COORDINATION” implies two (or more) equal parties organizing their efforts together toward a common goal. Only equals can coordinate efforts.

This becomes clearer as we look at “consultation”. An agency, or an individual, can consult with another party about a given goal. However, in consultation, there is no necessity to use the input of the other party at all. I may choose to consult with a friend of mine about whether or not I should get a new car, but ultimately, it is my decision. In the same way, an agency, corporation, or other party may choose to go to a consultant for advice, but needs not follow it. In like kind, a Federal agency may choose to consult with local governments and private citizens about a given agenda, but can also choose to simply file away said concerns without having to show what was suggested by whom, how they used the input of parties, or if they didn’t, showing why they didn’t use input.

Furthermore, there is the term “cooperation”. It is not necessary that two parties be equal to cooperate. Anyone can cooperate with a given process without giving their consent to it. I can have a gun pointed to my head and choose to cooperate, whether or not I want to.

In stark contrast to these terms is “coordination”. Coordination can only be accomplished between two or more equal parties coordinating their efforts. This is crucial, and is one of the most effective ways that local governments are protecting themselves from LA21. Many Federal agencies are aware of their coordination requirements, although they may try and trick you and your local officials into a cooperative, or a consultative role. Do not fall for it. While the Constitution is still the supreme law of the land, this is still America.

America is about local control, and the protection of individual rights for all of us. There is so much precedent for the power of local government, it is astonishing. We only need to use it. Many of us are overcoming our fears of local officials for the greater good. Please, join us in this fight. You need not fight the same battles, but you must fight. The most effective way to stop Sustainable Development is to start locally, before it’s too late.

BASTIAT

And so, in accordance with the first installment, here are few choice quotes from the great Bastiat, and his masterpiece “The Law”, a must read for anyone:

“…Man can live and satisfy his wants only by ceaseless labor; by the ceaseless application of his faculties to natural resources. This process is the origin of property.

“But it is also true that a man may live and satisfy his wants by seizing and consuming the products of the labor of others. This process is the origin of plunder…”

“…Sometimes the law defends plunder and participates in it. Thus the beneficiaries are spared the shame, danger, and scruple, which their acts would otherwise involve. Sometimes the law places the whole apparatus of judges, police, prisons, and gendarmes at the service of the plunderers, and treats the victim — when he defends himself — as a criminal. In short, there is a legal plunder…”

“…This question of legal plunder must be settled once and for all, and there are only three ways to settle it:

1. The few plunder the many.

2. Everybody plunders everybody.

3. Nobody plunders anybody.

“We must make our choice among limited plunder, universal plunder, and no plunder. The law can follow only one of these three.

“Limited legal plunder: This system prevailed when the right to vote was restricted. One would turn back to this system to prevent the invasion of socialism.

“Universal legal plunder: We have been threatened with this system since the franchise was made universal. The newly enfranchised majority has decided to formulate law on the same principle of legal plunder that was used by their predecessors when the vote was limited.

“No legal plunder: This is the principle of justice, peace, order, stability, harmony, and logic. Until the day of my death, I shall proclaim this principle with all the force of my lungs (which alas! is all too inadequate)…

“…Socialism, like the ancient ideas from which it springs, confuses the distinction between government and society. As a result of this, every time we object to a thing being done by government, the socialists conclude that we object to its being done at all.

“We disapprove of state education. Then the socialists say that we are opposed to any education. We object to a state religion. Then the socialists say that we want no religion at all. We object to a state-enforced equality. Then they say that we are against equality. And so on, and so on. It is as if the socialists were to accuse us of not wanting persons to eat because we do not want the state to raise grain…”

“…This must be said: There are too many “great” men in the world — legislators, organizers, do-gooders, leaders of the people, fathers of nations, and so on, and so on. Too many persons place themselves above mankind; they make a career of organizing it, patronizing it, and ruling it.

“Now someone will say: “You yourself are doing this very thing.” True. But it must be admitted that I act in an entirely different sense; if I have joined the ranks of the reformers, it is solely for the purpose of persuading them to leave people alone. I do not look upon people as Vancauson looked upon his automaton. Rather, just as the physiologist accepts the human body as it is, so do I accept people as they are. I desire only to study and admire…”

“…God has given to men all that is necessary for them to accomplish their destinies. He has provided a social form as well as a human form. And these social organs of persons are so constituted that they will develop themselves harmoniously in the clean air of liberty. Away, then, with quacks and organizers! A way with their rings, chains, hooks, and pincers! Away with their artificial systems! Away with the whims of governmental administrators, their socialized projects, their centralization, their tariffs, their government schools, their state religions, their free credit, their bank monopolies, their regulations, their restrictions, their equalization by taxation, and their pious moralizations!

“And now that the legislators and do-gooders have so futilely inflicted so many systems upon society, may they finally end where they should have begun: May they reject all systems, and try liberty; for liberty is an acknowledgment of faith in God and His works.”

- Frederic Bastiat – “The Law”; 1850

Judge: Warrant required for cell phone location data, mentions Orwell's 1984

2011-09-02T16:30:00.000-07:00

Computer World
September 2, 2011

Most Americans have a cell phone on them or nearby at all times and are concerned with the legality of cell phone location tracking. The courts have wobbled back and forth on Fourth Amendment rulings that decide if the government needs a warrant in order to access records that reveal a user's cell phone location. It has been argued that when users have their mobile phone turned on, they choose to waive their expectation of privacy by 'voluntarily' transmitting their location. On Monday, there was a big win for the Fourth Amendment when Judge Nicholas Garaufis of the Eastern District of New York stood up for the Constitution and ruled that law enforcement must establish probable cause to secure a warrant before cell phone providers can be made to hand over location history.

The federal government had asked the court to order Verizon Wireless to turn over 113 days of location data about a suspect's phone. Judge Garaufis wrote that because we have our phones handy at all time, "our physical movements are being monitored and recorded, and once the Government can make a showing of less-than-probable-cause, it may obtain these records of our movements, study the map our lives, and learn the many things we reveal about ourselves through our physical presence." In fact he called it 'fiction' — the idea that most Americans consent to warrantless government tracking and access to their location history by 'choosing' to carry a phone.

Judge Garaufis wrote, "the collection of cell-site-location records effectively enables 'mass' or 'wholesale' electronic surveillance, and raises greater Fourth Amendment concerns than a single electronically surveilled car trip." He added that this "level of Governmental intrusion" was "previously inconceivable," so the Fourth Amendment doctrine needs "to evolve to meet these changes."

And then Judge Garaufis even referenced George Orwell's 1984. In the conclusion, he wrote:

While the government's monitoring of our thoughts may be the archetypical Orwellian intrusion, the government's surveillance of our movements of a considerable time period through new technologies, such as the collection of cell-site-location records, without the protections of the Fourth Amendment, puts our country far closer to Oceania than our Constitution permits. It is time that the courts begin to address whether revolutionary changes in technology require change to existing Fourth Amendment doctrine.

Also on Monday, California unanimously passed a cell phone privacy bill that would require law enforcement to secure a warrant before searching the contents of a cell phone. The bill still needs to be approved by the senate before it goes before the governor to possibly be signed into law.

While the police opposed the bill because there are times when stopping to get a warrant is not 'practical,' there are exceptions when law enforcement can search a smartphone without a warrant. SFGate reported, "police will be able to search a phone without a warrant if they believe they need to do so to prevent injuries, stop the destruction of evidence or prevent a crime from occurring."

Sen. Mark Leno, the bill's author, said, "If you are caught with a laptop, they need a warrant. If they come to your home for some reason, they can't walk into your bedroom, personal office or look at your computer without a warrant. Everything inside your phone requires a warrant wherever else it can be found, so why should the smart phone be different?"

The Supreme Court will soon decide about the constitutionality of warrantless GPS tracking, but in the clash of the Fourth Amendment, technology and law enforcement surveillance, there was another recent "win" for privacy. The police had a suspect's mobile phone number but not his location. The Baltimore Sun reported that Maryland U.S. District Judge Susan Gauvey "refused to issue a warrant sought by federal authorities to find a suspect through his cellphone's GPS data, saying the government was trying to use technology in a new way - 'not to collect evidence of a crime, but solely to locate a charged defendant'."

Eco-Nazi Agenda, Pt.1

2011-07-29T05:25:00.000-07:00

HOTT
July 29, 2011

Sustainable Development

The term Sustainable is thrown around an awful lot lately. For many, “sustainable living” can bring to mind any number of images. For me, I used to think of organic gardening and crop rotation. Mainly, a process is considered sustainable when it can be done without creating excess waste, considers “unseen” concerns, and simultaneously uses the energy it needs to function in such a way as to either meet or exceed the required amount necessary for production. However, the term “Sustainable Development” describes a specific series of public policy objectives designed by the United Nations. As defined by the “World Commission on Environment and Development”, sustainable development is:

“Development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.”

According to the U.N., this is best accomplished by international legislation with sweeping changes in the entire structure of our society, all in the name of these goals:

1.) Protect the environment

2.) Stimulate economic development

3.) Promote social equity

Who could possibly have a problem with these goals? When we as people do not engage with our environment harmoniously, negative results result for humans. Not to mention, I would love to stimulate the economy! As far as social equity goes, I am a firm believer that we are all equal unto each other, brothers and sisters under the Eternal Only God.

However, as is often the case with things that seem too good to be true, these terms have very different meanings when taken in the context of the United Nations version of “Sustainable Development”. Let’s review each of these goals individually, for the terms are deceiving to the average man intentionally.

Firstly, take the stated goal to “protect the environment”. The word “environment” does not mean untouched nature only, as many of us naturally believe. “Environment” means the entire eco-system of the earth, including our human economy, population, goods, services, as well as all touched and untouched natural space on our entire planet earth. And what do they mean by “protect”? Protect does not mean to keep safe, or even to keep human production in harmony with our environment. “Protect” means to keep off limits to the general population. The masses will be unable to use it, visit it, or in any way enact with it, unless they are allowed to do so by the U.N. In fact, untouched natural landscape will be completely off-limits to any human interaction whatsoever unless they are U.N. officers. To accomplish these totalitarian goals, the U.N. will need complete authority and ownership of the environment. And so you see, when we investigate the term “protect the environment”, it really means “give the UN total power over the earth”.

The second goal, “Stimulate economic growth”, is also misleading. The kind of “economic growth” they are referring to is not the free-market economy you and I think about. It is the new world economic system, where we will all operate under a single fiat currency, and the only jobs available will be for U.N. sponsored corporations.The main reason this goal seems to be included is to make the rest of its Agenda more palatable to the uninformed. The main reason “Sustainable Development” will stimulate the economy is because there will be a natural need for workers to execute this new world order, which will naturally create positions that need to be filled, thereby “stimulating”. However, this is only dealing with the “seen” aspects of “development”, as we shall discuss later.

Even the goal of “social equity” is not the social equality that Dr. King dreamed of. Social equity, under the guise of creating equality and ensuring individual needs, in truth suggests that we should all work for the benefit of the collective state. In truth they want us to work for the state for free, and do so in order to own nothing, and with no hope for advancement in our position. The culmination of all inequality is a group of people oppressed as slaves under their rulers. And we would all be slaves under the U.N.

AGENDA 21

In Rio de Janiero, 1992, a summit was held between various UN agencies in conjunction with the International Union for the Conservation of Nature for the purpose of creating a policy document for sustainable development. Known as the Rio Earth Summit, this meeting created the now infamous document Local Agenda 21. Also known as Agenda 21, this document outlines the recommendations for future development that the UN has deemed “sustainable”, and calls for a major restructuring of society, with cooperation on the part of every level of government with these “sustainable” goals.

In order to harmonize American development with Agenda 21, Bill Clinton created the Presidents Council on Sustainable Development (PCSD) in June 1993. This consisted of 12 cabinet secretaries, all from corporate or environmentalist organizations. The PCSD operated through the 90’s, and is responsible for promoting “Sustainable Development” throughout the government via publications such as “Sustainable America: A New Consensus” (1996), and the follow ups “Building on Consensus”, and “The Road to Sustainable Development”.

To help facilitate the move into a sustainable world, federal grants and subsidies were offered by the EPA and other Federal agencies to create Non Government Organizations and Foundations specifically formed to promote and help development of “Sustainable Development”. This created a thriving economy of Non Government Organizations (NGO’s) such as the American Planning Association, which received $3,885,093 to promote “Sustainable Development”. As you can imagine, this is a great incentive to align your policies with your funding. NGO’s such as The Sustainable Resource Center and the Institute for Sustainable Development receive millions of dollars in grants for the expressed purpose of forwarding the goals of Agenda 21. Federal grants are not only given to NGO’s, however. Through “visioning” and “challenge” grants, local governments are enticed into starting to develop their neighborhoods into a “sustainable” communities. Often, these grants will go to planning departments and universities in order to ensure a return on the investment. This is happening in your locality right now.

The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) says this of NGO’s:

“Since its inception, UNESCO has recognized that non-governmental organizations and foundations which have concerns close to its own play an important role in international cooperation in the service of peoples.

“For more than a half-century, UNESCO has woven a valuable tapestry of cooperative relations with a number of such organizations in its fields of competence, thereby enabling it to work with civil society in achieving its objectives and to disseminate through them its democratic and ethical ideals.”

(http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=32906&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html)

THE VISION

Mainly, these NGO’s will exert their influence locally through a process known as “Visioning”. This process consists of a town hall style meeting between “stakeholders” in sustainable development, all chosen by an NGO facilitator. “Stakeholders” are generally members of local government agencies, along with representatives from business, finance, education, etc. Along with these chosen officials, key members from environmental groups and “social justice” organizations are invited to attend.

These visioning process meetings are designed to make it appear as though Agenda 21 is being implemented from the ground up, rather than the top down. However, the Local planning meetings always come to the same solutions outlined by Agenda 21. The “stakeholders” that are chosen are all known proponents of the goals desired, and this is no accident. In fact, stakeholders who are sympathetic to the cause are chosen openly and on purpose, because they say that the old way of doing things created “gridlock”. This is seen as detrimental to a process with such beneficial goals as Agenda 21. In order to avoid this gridlock, the panel is decided about the outcome before the process begins.

Once the visioning process is complete, the next step is to convert it into a Comprehensive land use plan, adopted by local elected officials in the form of an ordinance that is enforceable with fines and other penalties. What are these beneficial goals that are so vital, so important, so essential to our survival that all deliberation be swept aside in its favor?

According to the U.N., the ideal community as described in Agenda 21 is a city where everything is run by the government. Instead of cars, public transportation systems will exist. Instead of houses and personal property, people will be stacked into housing projects; built to “sustainable” codes, of course. Instead of individual farmers, local growers and backyard hobbyists, there will be certain plots of land sectioned off for farming, all designed and run by the government, of course. All of this food will be grown using chemicals, genetic modification, and pesticides. Instead of a free-market operating on supply, demand, and self interest, you will be able to decide your future from a list of various government sponsored corporations and subsidized businesses.

Agenda 21 also outlines the creation of a standing world army under the command of the UN secretary General. Additionally, the United Nations calls for disarmament of nations under the guises of peace, when in reality the UN remains as armed as ever (and more). This is the crux of all “disarmament” discussions, and gun control laws already in effect.

The IMF, World Bank, Development programs, and World Trade Organization will be consolidated into an “economic security council”. This council will preside over a singular world currency, and have sole authority over the world economy. Similar plans are outlined for the education system, the health care system, etc.

Even the environmental legislation that they have proposed is preposterous. We all want there to be a natural landscape for us to be able to visit, camp, and enjoy desire (which is certainly what fuels the support of countless hippies). However, the Wildlands Project suggested a system of biosphere wilderness areas that will be completely off limits to anyone but the U.N., surrounded by buffer zones of limited public population activity. The Wildlands Project called for 50% of North America to be turned into wilderness areas of this nature, all connected by wilderness corridors. Just this past week, Obama put this project on hold, but two other Senators are re-introducing it under a different name.

In the light of recent events in Arizona, please note that these “protected” areas which are off-limits to the general public are used heavily by drug runners for different cartels. It is a well documented fact that the intelligence community is dealing drugs. Because of the “off-limits” status of Federal lands, these corridors can be used for black operations. This is evidenced by our most recent fires in Arizona, which were lit by (allegedly) Mexican drug cartel runners who lit a back fire because they were being pursued. It is also worth mentioning that when areas like this are destroyed, development that was not possible before can be proposed. I wonder what development codes will be used to rebuild?

WITH WHAT MONEY?

It is not uncommon for people to think that just because money can be printed by the government, then they expect that it is printed in order to match the costs needed for government programs. The truth is far less mysterious. The government has no money; NONE AT ALL. The only money that the government has is that which it is allocated to receive through taxes, fees, and tolls imposed on the working population and economy. Even if money is “printed” often, it cannot be printed for every task “ad nauseum”. If money were printed like this, then it would be so abundant that it would be worth less than its paper. Even when a government does choose to print money for a given scenario, the hope is that said money will circulate through the system, bringing economic energy wherever it is needed, and make its way back into the hands of the government as well.

So, where will the funding come for all this “smart growth”? Taxes, fees, and tolls imposed on the working class slaves that will continue keeping the economy turning. It could be argued that the taxes and fees imposed are the cost of government, and is one of the best investments a citizen can make. In response, I would like to quote the great French 19^th century economist Claude Frédéric Bastiat. In fact, his work is so appropriate to our current situation, that I will take the liberty to quote his work at length:

“In the economy, an act, a habit, an institution, a law, gives birth not only to an effect, but to a series of effects. Of these effects, the first only is immediate; it manifests itself simultaneously with its cause—it is seen. The others unfold in succession—they are not seen: it is well for us if they are foreseen. Between a good and a bad economist this constitutes the whole difference—the one takes account of the visible effect; the other takes account both of the effects which are seen and also of those which it is necessary to foresee. Now this difference is enormous, for it almost always happens that when the immediate consequence is favorable, the ultimate consequences are fatal, and the converse. Hence it follows that the bad economist pursues a small present good, which will be followed by a great evil to come, while the true economist pursues a great good to come, at the risk of a small present evil…

“The advantages which officials advocate are those that are seen. The benefit that accrues to the dispensers is still that which is seen. This blinds all eyes. But the disadvantages which the taxpayers have to bear are those that are not seen. And the injury that results from it to the providers is still that which is not seen, although this ought to be self-evident. When an official spends for his own account an extra hundred sous, it implies that a taxpayer spends for his account a hundred sous less. But the expense of the official is seen, because the act is performed, while that of the taxpayer is not seen, because, alas! he is prevented from performing it.

“You compare the nation, perhaps to a parched tract of land, and the tax to a fertilizing rain. So be it. But you ought also to ask yourself where are the sources of this rain, and whether it is not the tax itself which draws away the moisture from the ground and dries it up? Again, you ought to ask yourself whether it is possible that the soil can receive as much of this precious water by rain as it loses by evaporation? There is one thing very certain, that when John Q. Citizen counts out a hundred sous for the tax-gatherer, he receives nothing in return. Afterwards, when an official spends these hundred sous, and returns them to John Q. Citizen, it is in exchange for an equal value in corn or labor. The final result is a loss to John Q. Citizen of five francs.

“It is very true that often, perhaps very often, the official performs for John Q. Citizen an equivalent service. In this case there is no loss on either side; there is merely an exchange. Therefore, my arguments do not at all apply to useful functionaries. All I say is—if you wish to create an office, prove its utility. Show that its value to John Q. Citizen, by the services which it performs for him, is equal to what it costs him. But, apart from this intrinsic utility, do not bring forward as an argument the benefit that it confers upon the official, his family, and his providers; do not assert that it encourages labor. When John Q. Citizen gives a hundred sous to a Government officer for a really useful service, it is exactly the same as when he gives a hundred sous to a shoemaker for a pair of shoes. But when John Q. Citizen gives a hundred sous to a Government officer, and receives nothing for them unless it be annoyances, he might as well give them to a thief. It is nonsense to say that the Government officer will spend these hundred sous to the great profit of national labor; the thief would do the same; and so would John Q. Citizen, if he had not been stopped on the road by the extra-legal parasite, nor by the lawful sponger. Let us accustom ourselves, then, to avoid judging of things by what is seen only, but to judge of them by that which is not seen.”

- “That Which Is Seen, And That Which Is Not Seen”, by Bastiat

THIS IS IT

And so, in regards to “Sustainable Development”, it is clear that we are dealing with serious legislation, which will have serious effects on our daily lives. This short article is not even able to give you a basic synopsis of what is being implemented through “Local” action, and how it will change our world. For those of us who have been studying the “conspiracy”, world government, the U.N., and all the rest, this is it. This is the culmination of everything the unseen hand has been working for, and how they will implement it. This is the New World Order, and it has already happened, is happening, and if we aren’t active locally, we will lose everything within our generation.

Please, do not take this legislation lightly. Investigate “Sustainable Development” in your community. Stakeholders will deny that “Sustainable Development” has anything to do with Agenda 21, which is absolutely ridiculous. The Presidents Council for Sustainable Development was created to implement Agenda 21 in America. Additionally, local officials are most likely unaware of the reality that is facing our communities. We must learn, educate, and DO NOT LEGISLATE!

You must look into your local governments and find out how “Sustainable Development” is being enacted in your community. I assure you, it is. Some keyword’s to look for:

- Sustainable

- Smart Growth

- Visioning

- Comprehensive Land Use Planning

Once you identify a planning committee, you can call them and ask to attend the planning meeting. You can also just walk into your local city hall and start asking questions, but you may run into a firestorm. You may want to approach a local organization that shares your interests. I recommend that you be wary, however; for there are many wolves in sheep’s clothing… Nevertheless, you may be able to find other individuals in those organizations that you can build alliances with. In any case, doing nothing is not an option anymore. We must work.

We will continue this discussion in part 2…

(Note: Due to the length of this series, we will do a dedicated Bibliography at the end).

List of Goldman Sachs People in the Obama Government

2011-05-17T22:00:00.000-07:00

FDL
May 18, 2011

At a time when Congressional hearings are set to call testimony from some Goldman Sachs employees, it is vital to understand how widespread that institution’s ties are to the Obama administration. This diary shows the pervasive influence of Goldman Sachs and Goldman created institutions (like the Hamilton Project embedded in the Brookings Institution), employees and influence peddlers in the Obama administration.

While many of the people listed below formerly worked for Goldman Sachs or its offshoots (like the Hamilton Project, including all three of that project’s first Directors) influence can be exerted not only through people but through money, awards, sponsored scholarship, and creation of an agenda favorable to Goldman Sachs (which is where Brookings and the Hamilton Project come in and have proved especially useful to Goldman Sachs).

It is further of note that although Goldman Sachs has been the center of attention especially since Matt Taibbi’s insightful investigative journalism, that I have not been able to find a comprehensive list of the influence of Goldman Sachs in this administration. Recently in the New York Post, for instance, Michelle Malkin wrote a good article called "All the President’s Goldman Men" but she only listed the usual suspects like Larry Summers, Timothy Geithner, Rahm Emanuel, Gary Gensler and Mark Patterson.

But that’s just the tip of the Goldman Sachs iceberg. Here you will find, I believe, the most comprehensive list of people-groups yet available to show how Obama’s administration has really become the Goldman Sachs administration. But I need your help. I suspect there are far more people out there with such ties that I have missed even though I have spent lots of time researching this issue. If you know of other people who should be on this list, please help out and give the details in a comment to this diary.

One further caveat. The Obama administration is not the first administration that Goldman has infiltrated, although it is perhaps the one that has been most completely co-opted from top to bottom. Recall that former Secretary of the Treasury Paulson in the George W. Bush era came from–Goldman Sachs where he was its chief. Recall too that the brilliant, late economist John K. Galbreath has written an entire chapter of a book devoted to the Great Depression and the economic collapse of Wall St. that accompanied it to the role of Goldman Sachs.

Law professor William Black, who participated in actions against individuals in the Savings and Loan collapses decades ago, recently told Bill Moyers recently that:

"The highest return on assets is always a political contribution."

In this spirit we name the first two links between Goldman entities and the Obama administration: they are out of alphabetical order for obvious reasons. All the others are in alphabetical order.

Let’s look at the Goldman Sachs government that we have in place now, that is masked by Barack Obama. Fittingly, we begin with Obama:

OBAMA, BARACK.

Although to my knowledge he has never directly worked for Goldman, he has taken boatloads of their money (an investment repaid many times) and he calls Robert Rubin, the former head of Goldman Sachs "my friend Bob". (See the video clip of then Senator Barack Obama’s address to the Goldman-Rubin funded Hamilton Project in a link below where he uses these words and calls for cuts in entitlements and more NAFTA-type agreements).

Jesse Unruh, the late California politician and political thinker, once called "money the mother’s milk of politics." Certainly, Obama sucked at the teats of Goldman Sachs more than any other politician in recent times. It began for him as little-known Senator from Illinois with a razor- thin resume whose ambitions outshine his accomplishments. Obama’s eloquent, heavily prepped address to the Democratic National Convention caught not only the eyes of the Democratic top brass, but that of the big bankers. As early as the Spring of 2006, Senator Barack Obama was intimately involved with Bob Rubin and Goldman Sachs through his involvement with the Hamilton Project.

Fittingly, Senator Obama was chosen by Rubin and the Hamilton Project to give the inaugural address of the Hamilton Project in April, 2006. An excellent, seminal discussion of the Hamilton Project by Dr. Kirk James Murphy, M.D., can be found here. A video clip of then Senator Barack Obama speaking at the inauguration of the Hamilton Project in April, 2006 can be found here and here (with an excellent discussion) and here. Here Obama heaps lavish praise on Robert Rubin ("my friend Bob") and on the Hamilton Project while setting out its (and his subsequent administration’s agenda) of cuts in entitlements, the need for more NAFTA-type free trade pacts and a pro-big corporation government. In 2006 then, Obama was a Goldie and articulating its desires and policies.

Little wonder then, that Goldman and Rubin heavily funded Obama as a Senator (his biggest campaign contributor) and as a presidential candidate. Goldman Sachs employees (and they were not the floor cleaners) contributed $994,795 to Obama’s presidential bid, almost four times the amount they gave to his Republican opponent, according to OpenSecrets. Over Obama’s entire career, Goldman has been his second biggest contributor, according to OpenSecrets, giving him more than $1,051,000. Goldman not only wanted Obama to win, they paid lots of money to insure that their man would occupy the White House. Again, as William Black noted:

"The highest return on assets is always a political contribution."

Goldman’s 30 pieces of silver investment in Obama reaped them billions of dollars in returns as the TARP bailouts and the subsequent news about Goldman Sachs has shown. So although Obama may never have "worked for" Goldman in the traditional sense, he’s one of Robert Rubin’s boys and on Goldman’s books.

University of Minnesota political scientist Prof. Lawrence Jacobs, described the giant squid’s attachment to the Obama administration:

almost everything that the White House has done has been haunted by the personnel and the money of Goldman . . . as well as the suspicion that the White House, particularly early on, was pulling its punches out of deference to Goldman and its war chest.

BIDEN, JOE.

Is it any wonder that between his service as "Senator Credit Card", his efforts to limit busing for desegregation, and his five draft deferments at the height of the Vietnam War that Joe Biden is attached to one of Goldman’s tentacles? Goldman has been a major campaign contributor to Biden and according to OpenSecrets, Biden in 2007 alone took almost $25,000 from the Robert Rubin related Citigroup (Rubin was its head as well as being a former head of Goldman).

And guess who was the keynote speaker at the Hamilton Project 2010 kickoff event a few days ago (April 20th, 2010) Tuesday morning at the Renaissance Mayflower Hotel? That’s right: Vice President Joe Biden spoke at Goldman Sachs/Robert Rubin’s Rosemary’s Baby. You can see some pics of Biden at the Hamilton Project event along with who else–Robert Rubin–here.

As described by the Huffington Post:

Biden was speaking at the relaunch of the Hamilton Project, a think tank founded by ultimate Wall Street Democrat Robert Rubin to publicly despair about the deficit and other things bankers worry about the most.

Note too that in his address Biden paid tribute to Obama’s bipartisan deficit commission, something that the Hamilton Project and Robert Rubin (and Goldman) have been pushing for years because it really means cuts in entitlements (again, have a look at Sen. Obama’s 2006 speech at the Hamilton Project where he calls for entitlement cuts).

ALTMAN, ROGER.

Interestingly, the man who introduced Joe Biden at the Hamilton Project’s relaunch (described above) was none other than Roger Altman, who is connected to the Hamilton Project.

Altman may not hold down a desk job in the Obama administration–he’s too big a fish for that just as is Robert Rubin–but he is one of those power brokers with all encompassing contacts within the Democratic Party. Altman is a Hamilton Project member, according to Dan Frumkin’s excellent article in the Huffington Post, as well as having served as Assistant Secretary of the Treasury under none other than Mr. Goldman Sachs, Robert Rubin. He is now now Chairman of Evercore Partners, which the Hamilton Project program described as "the most active investment banking boutique in the world." (and the Obama administration is trying to sell itself as one that is getting tough on big banks and Goldman?).

Like so many of the Goldman people, Altman has a touch of scandal/criminality about him. According to Wikipedia, Altman was forced from his position as Assistant Treasury Secretary because of a records keeping scandal.

Altman is a co-author, along with Robert Rubin, of the Hamilton Project’s "From Recession to Recovery to Renewal: An Economic Strategy to Achieve Broadly Shared Growth." Some of Altman’s ties to the Goldman-Rubin funded Hamilton Project can be seen here.

BRAINARD, LAEL.

Brainard is the United States Under Secretary of the Treasury for International Affairs in the administration of President Barack Obama. She is an associate and protege of Mr. Goldman Sachs, Robert Rubin. She has written numerous articles and bookson the joys of outsourcing work overseas.

Brainard also worked at Brookings which has embedded within in Goldman Sachs and Robert Rubin’s Hamilton Project. Goldman was clever in doing this because they hid a conservative thinking, pro business group like a Trojan Horse in what is generally perceived as a liberal think tank.

Like Timothy Geithner, who is her boss, Brainard is a brainy person who had trouble with income tax rules and regulations, thus joining quite a lengthy list of Goldies who ape the law. The Washington Post reported that:

Brainard’s nomination was held up by Republican concerns over allegations that she failed to pay property taxes on time. (What is it with Treasury and tax problems?)

BUFFETT, WARREN.

Speaking of big fish, Warren doesn’t need to work for the US government or for Goldman. But he’s invested billions in Goldman expecting even greater returns. Obama has also admitted in the debates to "pal’in around" with the Sage of Omaha and Buffett is one of Obama’s fundraisers and economic advisers.

For more on Buffett see this written by Michael Winship at Truthout:

On Friday, Susan Pulliam reported on the front page of The Wall Street Journal that, "A Goldman Sachs Group Inc. director tipped off a hedge-fund billionaire about a $5 billion investment in Goldman by Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc. before a public announcement of the deal at the height of the 2008 financial crisis, a person close to the situation says."

As the Journal notes, the Buffet deal came at a key point in the Wall Street collapse, restoring confidence in the markets and lifting Goldman’s stock from a 40 percent slide to a 45 percent surge. The hedge-fund billionaire in question is Raj Rajaratnam, whose Galleon Group currently is embroiled in one of the biggest insider trading scandals in history: 21, including Rajaratnam, have been charged; 11 already have pled guilty.

(emphasis added)

CLINTON, HILLARY.

Although Barack Obama was the overwhelming favorite of Goldman Sachs to be president in 2008, for he could serve as their Trojan Horse, they were smart enough to hedge their bets, so to speak and back Hillary too. According to the Washington Examiner, Goldman Sachs in 2008 alone gave:

($415,595.63 inflation adjusted), which was itself almost three times as much as Bush received as well.

And of course, it was Hillary’s hubby Bill Clinton who chose ex-Goldman chief Robert Rubin to serve in his White House. Bill, Hillary and Bob Rubin are Washington, D.C. kissing cousins.

CRAIG, GREGORY.

Another example of the revolving door between Goldman Sachs and Obama’s administration. Craig served as Obama’s White House Counsel and after resigning, has taken on a position as Goldman Sach’s chief lawyer in defending against its SEC suit. A former Goldie, Robert Hormats, sits at the top of SEC’s enforcement group too. What a hoot!

Note that Craig is a lawyer and lawyer’s rules of professional responsibility prohibit not only direct conflicts of interest but anything that hints at a conflict of interest.

Here is doubtlessly why Goldman wanted Craig as its top lawyer in the SEC complaint:

Greg Craig, Obama’s first White House counsel, has joined Goldman, we learned this week. He may not have too much pull in the West Wing, which drove him out for hewing too close to Obama’s campaign promises, but as a former insider he will provide valuable intelligence to the world’s largest investment bank.

Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/Is-Goldman-Obamas-Enron-No-its-worse-91613449.html#ixzz0mHKfS3hl

DONILON, THOMAS.

Thomas Donilon is Deputy National Security Adviser to Barack Obama (despite having a career that is mostly involved with domestic politics). Donilon was a lawyer at O’Melveny and Myers and made almost $4 million representing meltdown clients including Penny Pritzker (of Chicago) and Goldman. This from Michelle Malkin’s article RealClearPolitics. More information is available on Donilon over at Whorunsgov.com.

DUDLEY, BILL.

Joined Goldman in 1986; partner and managing director until 2007. Federal Reserve Bank of New York President since January 2009 (replacing none other than Timothy Geithner, his Goldman compadre). This all from the Wall Street Journal.

ELMENDORF, DOUGLAS.

Elmendorf became Obama’s Director of the Congressional Budget Office in January 2009. Elmendorf previously was the Director of the Hamilton Project; it’s third.

Note too that the first 3 Directors of the Hamilton Project ALL serve in the Obama administration. While other journalists/writers have explored the links between Goldman Sachs and Obama, few have looked at the connection between the Hamilton Project and the Obama administration. Note again that the Hamilton Project was funded by Robert Rubin and Goldman Sachs. Note too that the current director of the Hamilton Project, its 4th since its founding in 2006, is Michael Greenstone. How long will it be before Greenstone goes to the Obama administration, making it a perfect 4 for 4 for Directors of the Goldman funded Hamilton Project? To show that there is a revolving door between the Obama Administration and Goldman/Rubin/Hamilton Project, Greenstone served as of Obama’s chief economic advisers.

EMANUEL, RAHM.

Rahm, of course, is Obama’s Chief of Staff, the very first person Obama selected to be in his administration. Rahm has lengthy and fruitful ties to Goldman, and vice versa. Rahm took in about $75,000 from Goldman Sachs as a Congressman and was on a $3,000 a month retainer from Goldman while he worked as Bill Clinton’s chief fund raiser.

Timothy Carney has explored some of the links between Emanuel and Goldman Sachs:

…one of Barack Obama’s top sources of funds in this past election, Goldman has always had some particularly strong allies within government. Emanuel is one such ally.

An interesting early chapter in the Goldman-Emanuel relationship took place in the setting of Bill Clinton’s campaign for the White House in 1992. Clinton hired Emanuel as his chief fundraiser.

At the same time, however, Emanuel was on the payroll of Goldman Sachs, receiving $3,000 per month from the firm to “introduce us to people,” in the words of one Goldman partner at the time. This is certainly a noteworthy relationship, but it’s one that has almost entirely escaped scrutiny.

Corporations and partnerships are and were at the time prohibited by law from contributing to federal candidates out of the corporate coffers. So, while Rahm tapped Goldman employees personally for six figures in gifts to Clinton’s candidacy—more than any other firm—Goldman, as a company, was helping keep Clinton’s top fundraiser well-fed.

…

In his four terms in Congress, Emanuel has raised $74,750 from Goldman, making the firm his number four source of funds. Goldman has helped Emanuel. How has Emanuel helped Goldman?

The most obvious answer, as mentioned in this column two weeks ago, is in Emanuel’s lead role in shepherding the “$700 billion” bailout—first proposed by former a Goldman CEO, Bush Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson—through the skeptical House.

Of course, back in the Clinton days, Goldman benefited from NAFTA and the bailout of the Mexican currency, with Emanuel pushing NAFTA through Congress, and Rubin hammering out the peso bailout.

McClatchey newspaper’s Greg Gordon, in his article entitled, "Goldman’s White House Connections Raise Eyebrows" also noted how Rahm and Goldman worked together to make money:

One White House insider who knows something about how Wall Street does business is chief of staff Emanuel, who earned millions of dollars in investment banking after he left the Clinton White House. His work for the Chicago-based financial services firm Wasserstein Perella & Co. intersected with Goldman in at least one deal.

In 1999, Emanuel was a key player representing Unicom Corp., the parent of Commonwealth Edison, in forging its merger with Peco Energy Co. to create utility giant Exelon Corp. Goldman was also advising Unicom.

The White House declined immediate comment on that connection.

So how real is the Obama/Democratic party’s supposed new toughness on big banks when the administration’s point guard was on the Goldman payroll and become a multi-millionaire through big banks and Wall St. deals?

FARRELL, DIANA.

Diana Farrell is Deputy Director of the National Economic Council (since January, 2009) in the administration of President Barack Obama. She formerly worked for two years at Goldman Sachs in New York according to Whorunsgov.com.

In 2003, Farrell was the author of a paper, "Perspective on Outsourcing" in which she argued that sending American jobs overseas might be "as beneficial to the U.S. as to the destination country, probably more so." In a book titled “The Economists’ Voice: Top Economists Take on Today’s Problems,” Farrell wrote a chapter titled “U.S. Offshoring: Small Steps to make it Win-Win.” Her chapter, published in 2008, centered on offshoring.

In the Obama administration, Farrell works with a coven of Goldies including Timothy Geithner and Larry Summers, who is her boss.

FRIEDMAN, STEPHEN.

Chairman of Obama’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board.

According to Wikipedia, Friedman worked for much of his career with Goldman Sachs, holding numerous executive roles. He served as the company’s co-chief operating officer from 1987 to 1990, was the company’s co-chairman from 1990 to 1992, and the sole chairman from 1992 to 1994; he still serves on the company board.

Friedman was another Goldie involved in controversy, as many of the Goldies have been in government service, involving his former employer. His actions, like other affiliated with Goldman, show scant respect for rules, regulations or laws.

Wikipedia notes:

On May 7, 2009 Friedman resigned as Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York in response to criticism of his December 2008 purchase of $3 million of stock in Goldman Sachs. Friedman, who remains a member of Goldman Sachs’ board, came into violation of Federal Reserve policy when Goldman was converted to a bank holding company in September 2008, thereby placing it under the regulatory authority of the New York Fed. Friedman requested a waiver from this violation when the conversion occurred, which was granted roughly two and a half months later.

FROHMAN, MICHAEL.

Robert Rubin’s Chief of Staff while Rubin served as Secretary of the Treasury and an Obama “head hunter” according to “Rubin Proteges Change Their Tune as They Join Obama’s Team” in the New York Times.

FURMAN, JASON.

Furman served as the second Director of the Hamilton Project after Peter Orszag’s departure for the Obama administration and he in turn left the Hamilton Project in June 2008 to direct economic policy for the Obama Presidential Campaign.

FUDGE, ANNE.

Obama just appointed Fudge to his budget deficit reduction committee. Fudge has been the pr craftsman for some of America’s largest corporations. She sits, according to the Washington Post, as a Trustee of the Brookings Institution within which the Hamilton Project is embedded.

GALLOGLY, MARK.

Gallogly sits on the Hamilton Project’s advisory council. He is also, according to Wikipedia, currently a member of President Barack Obama’s President’s Economic Recovery Advisory Board.

GEITHNER, TIMOTHY.

He’s one of the most documented of all people within the Obama administration while serving as Obama’s Secretary of the Treasury. He was named head of the New York Fed by none other George W. Bush, again perhaps underscoring Gore Vidal’s observation that American is run by one corporate party and it has two wings: Republican and Democratic.

While at the head of the New York Fed, Geithner prior to the crisis not only failed to see storm clouds on the horizon, he also in 2008 ordered the bailed out AIG not to disclose its sweetheart payments to big banks including, you guessed it, Goldman Sachs. Geithner also worked with W’s Treasury Secretary Paulson to fashion the TARP agreements whereby billions were handed out to Wall St.

Geithner is a protoge of both Robert Rubin and Larry Summers.

Like other Goldies, Geithner has had trouble with rules, tax regulations and various. Recall that he had trouble at his confirmation hearings over his tax returns. Whorunsgov sums them up:

At the end of the Clinton administration, Geithner moved to the International Monetary Fund, where he was director of policy development. That period led to a blot on his personal record. The IMF, unlike most employers, does not pay the employer match on Social Security and Medicare taxes. Geithner was responsible for paying those taxes himself. He did not to do so until he was audited in 2005, and even then only paid the back taxes for 2003 and 2004. He did not pay the back taxes for 2001 and 2002 until after Obama tapped him to be Treasury secretary at the end of 2008.

Many of Geithner’s actions profited Goldman Sachs directly or indirectly, such as Geithner’s decision to deny Goldman’s competitor the same treatment he gave Goldman. As Time magazine noted:

[Geithner]Would not grant Lehman Brothers the right to become a bank-holding company — a status given to both Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs just days after Lehman filed for bankruptcy

Lehman Brothers collapsed, leaving Goldman Sachs with fewer competitors and a greater market share.

GENSLER, GARY.

Gensler was a Goldman Sachs partner who is Obama’s Commodity Futures Trading Commission head. Gensler is the guy who as a former Treasury official exempted the $58 trillion credit default market from oversight. Those financial instrumentals played a key role in the global economic downturn and led to billions of dollars in profits for banks like Goldman Sachs.

GREENSTONE, MICHAEL.

Greenstone is the 4th Director of the Hamilton Project. Just as attorney Craig went from advising Obama to defending Goldman Sachs against the SEC complaint, Greenstone has used the revolving door to go from went an economic adviser position to Obama to one of the Goldman Sachs outlets, in this case its think tank embedded in the Brookings Institution and funded by Goldman and Robert Rubin. All 3 previous Directors of the Hamilton Project work in the Obama administration.

HAMILTON PROJECT, THE.

The pro-corporatist think group funded by Goldman Sachs and Robert Rubin and cleverly hidden in the Brookings Institution as their Rosemary’s Baby/Trojan Horse. Espouses cutbacks in entitlements, strict budgetary thinking applied to all social programs (but not the defense department); outsourcing of American jobs overseas; more NAFTA-type agreements. Three of the first 4 Directors of the Hamilton Project serve in the Obama Administration. The fourth went from an economic adviser to Obama to the Hamilton Project.

It might also help to recall that the name "Hamilton Project" is significant. Recall that Alexander Hamilton, after whom the institute was named, had as his most famous dictum that "the people are a great beast." Hamilton espoused a powerful state bank and centralized government and presidency.

Note too that Sen. Barack Obama was the inaugural speaker at the Hamilton Project and lavished praise on "my friend Bob [Rubin]" and called for cuts in entitlements (Social Security) and more NAFTA agreements. This is the same guy who lied to the electorate, then, in union states like Ohio and Pennsylvania during the Democratic primaries when he said "NAFTA needs rethinking." He is firmly and totally behind NAFTA and has done no "rethinking" of it while President and with his party in firm control of Congress.

For more information, see the reading listed below on this subject and the Project’s web site.

HORMATS, ROBERT.

The top economics official at Obama’s State Department, Hormats spent the prior 27 years at Goldman Sachs, including as the Vice Chairman of Goldman’s international arm.

Hormat’s appointment to the Obama administration led Glenn Greenwald to this observation:

A Goldman executive as COO of the SEC’s enforcement division. This is all consistent with the observation of Desmond Lachman — previously chief emerging market strategist at Salomon Smith Barney and IMF deputy director — regarding "Goldman Sachs’s seeming lock on high-level U.S. Treasury jobs," which he cited as but one of the many "parallels between U.S. policymaking and what we see in emerging markets."

Imagine how this will play out. The SEC has lodged a complaint against Goldman Sachs. Goldman’s former Vice President in charge of Business Intelligence sits in the SEC’s enforcement division while Obama’s former top lawyer, White House Counsel Gregory Craig, has gone to defend Goldman Sachs!

KASHKARI, NEEL.

Former Vice President of Goldman Sachs in San Francisco where he where he led Goldman’s Information Technology Security Investment Banking practice. Kashkari served under Treasury Secretary Paulson and was kept on by Obama after his inauguration for a limited period to work on TARP oversight.

KORNBLUH, KAREN.

Sometimes called "Obama’s brain", she serves as Obama’s Ambassador to the OECD. Kornbluh was Deputy Chief of Staff to Mr. Goldman Sachs, Robert Rubin.

LEW, JACOB (AKA "JACK") J.

Lew is the United States Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources. According to Wikipedia, Lew sits on the Brookings-Rubin funded Hamilton Project Advisory Board. He also served with Robert Rubin in Bill Clinton’s cabinet as Director of OMB.

Like many affiliates of the Hamilton Project, along with Barack Obama, Lew believes that fiscal discipline needs to be applied to Social Security (not much talk about runaway costs in the military budget). According to the New York Times, Lew has testified that:

“Fiscal discipline is essential to protect Social Security and strengthen Medicare, so that both will be there in the years ahead. Reducing the accumulated federal debt will help us to protect these important programs.” (Congressional testimony in March 2000.)

Also like Robert Rubin, Lew has worked with Citicorp. The New York Times reported (same link as above) that:

As executive vice president of New York University, he tangled with a union representing graduate students who help teach courses.

LIPTON, DAVID A.

According to Paul Krugman, Lipton is at now at Obama’s National Economic Council and the National Security Council. Lipton worked with Larry Summers and Timothy Geithner, again according to Krugman, on the US response to the Asian financial crisis of the 1990′s. MergeFoundations reports that Lipton worked closely with Robert Rubin:

[he] advised and assisted Secretary Rubin on many key aspects of international economic policy.

MINDICH, ERIC.

Eric Mindich, while not officially serving in the Obama administration, is a strong Obama supporter with extensive ties to the President, according to a Ben Smith/Politico article. Mindich is a hedge fund manager and sits on the Advisory Council of the Hamilton Project and has worked at Goldman Sachs. In fact, he was the youngest ever partner with Goldman Sachs at the age of 27.

According to Wikipedia:

Prior to forming Eton Park in 2004, Mindich spent 15 years at Goldman Sachs in two main roles: leading the firm’s equities risk arbitrage business and managing the firm’s equities division. He joined the firm in 1988 in the equities arbitrage department and ran that department from 1992 until 2000.[1] In 1994, at age 27, he became the youngest partner ever in the history of Goldman Sachs.[1] In 2000, he became co-chief operating officer of the equities division and in 2002 became co-head of the equities division and a member of the Goldman Sachs Management Committee. In 2003, Mindich joined the Executive Office as senior strategy officer and chair of the Firmwide Strategy Committee.

Another website, Operational Due Diligence at Checkfundmanager, indicates the following about Mindich:

In March of 2009, Eton Park’s [hedge fund founded by him] assets under management were estimated to be around $13 billion.

An article from April of 2009 lists Mr. Mindich among the “inner circle” of economic advisors to Lawrence H. Summers, who is the current chief economic adviser to President Barack Obama. Mr. Mindich is also listed in another article as being a top level Democrat fundraiser.

…Eric Mindich, founder of Eton Park fund, reportedly supports Barack Obama’s presidential candidacy (2007).

…A February 2005 article rattles off a number of impressive credentials for Eric Mindich, including launching the largest hedge fund in history, graduating summa cum laude from Harvard, becoming the youngest ever partner at Goldman Sachs, and being endorsed by former Secretary of the Treasury Robert Rubin.

ORSZAG, PETER.

Obama’s Budget Director was the founding director of the Hamilton Project, funded by Goldman Sachs and Robert Rubin. Furthermore, Wikipedia indicates that Robert Rubin, Goldman’s ex-head, was one of Orszag’s mentors.

A BBC article notes Orsag’s commitment to Hamilton Project ideals like cutting the budget (mostly by cutting entitlements) and his ties to Goldman Sachs:

Mr Obama has signalled his determination to keep the budget deficit in check by appointing Peter Orszag, the head of the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), to head the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).

It is the OMB, rather than the Treasury, that allocates government spending and estimates the size of future budget deficits.

His appointment could help ease the new president’s relations with Congress.

Peter Orszag is well-known as a fiscal conservative, who is concerned to keep spending and tax cuts in check.

He was one of the first directors of the Hamilton Project, a Brookings think tank initiative backed by Robert Rubin…

The BBC failed to point out that Goldman Sachs also contributed to funding the Hamilton Project, and he was not "one of the first directors of the Hamilton Project" he was its first Director.

PATTERSON, MARK.

former lobbyist for Goldman Sachs who serves under Timothy Geithner as his top deputy and overseer of TARP bailout funds, $10 billion of which went to Goldman.

RATTNER, STEVE.
Ratner is the shady billionaire financier who Obama appointed as his “car czar” and who resigned after it was revealed that his company, the Quadrangle Group, was apparently involved in “pay to play” for a billion dollars or so of New York State pension funds, and was under possible indictment by the New York AG and the SEC, also sits on the Advisory Council of the Goldman funded Hamilton Project.

Rattner is yet another Goldie-Hamilton Project person in trouble with the law. He was the main financial supporter of Harold Ford’s aborted New York Senate run and speculation was that Rattner wanted a Senator to help protect him.

REISCHAUER, ROBERT D.

He was a member of the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission from 2000-2009 and was its vice chair from 2001-2008. He too sits on the Hamilton Project’s advisory board.

From this excellent discussion at "Meet Robert Rubin" here’s more information on Reischauer and his extensive links to Robert Rubin:

Robert Reischauer, another policy insider who penned a memo in 2009 with fellow Brookings Institution elites calling for Obama to take "action to stem the growth of Social Security and Medicare," were recently nominated by Obama to be Social Security Trustees. (The Blahous pick he apparently owed to Senator Mitch McConnell.)

Reischauer has close ties to economic wrecking ball Robert Rubin—the Goldman Sachs chairman who became Clinton Treasury Secretary and pushed through radical deregulatory banking laws, then went to Citigroup to score $120 million for driving his company into the ground. Rubin and Reischauer knew each other at both the Harvard Corporation and the Clinton White House, where Reischauer was director of CBO. Reischauer is on the advisory board of Rubin’s Hamilton Project, and the two most recent CBO directors have come straight from Hamilton.

NOTE: since writing this, it appears the above (and the quote below on Alice Rivkin) comes word for word from an Alternet article by Matthew Skomarovsky found here.

RIVLIN, ALICE.

Obama just named in March Alice Rivlin to his so called deficit reduction commission. Have a look at her background and you’ll see why and that Obama has stacked that commission with people who want cuts in entitlements.

Again, an excellent summary of her Goldman-Brookings (read Hamilton Project) Obama connections:

One of Reischauer’s co-signers of the Brookings memo, Alice Rivlin, is another fox Obama has put in charge of the Social Security henhouse. Former Vice Chair of the Federal Reserve under Greenspan at the peak of the tech bubble, and also a Hamilton Project board member, Rivlin will likely make another great Wall Street ally on the commission. In 2004 Rivlin co-authored (with Obama’s current Office of Management and Budget Director Peter Orszag, among others) a 138-page Brookings report titled "Restoring Fiscal Sanity" advocating $47 billion in entitlement cuts, including an "increase in the retirement age under Social Security" and "more accurate inflation adjustments to Social Security benefits."

Wikipedia also says of her:

She is currently on the board of directors of the New York Stock Exchange.

Wikipedia also notes that she has extensive Brookings Institution connections (within which the Hamilton Project is now embedded) including from 1957–66, 1969–75, 1983–93, and 1999 to the present.

Rivlin is a frequent speaker at the Hamilton Project as shown by this page at the Hamilton Project’s web site; you can see videos of her talks and the subjects of her papers here.

RUBIN, JAMES.

Son of Robert Rubin (see next entry). Served as a headhunter for Obama per the New York Times article, "Rubin Proteges Change Their Tune as They Join Obama’s Team".

RUBIN, ROBERT.

Mr. Goldman Sachs and co-funder, along with Goldman, of the Hamilton Project. Served as the 70th U.S. Sect. of the Treasury under Bill Clinton and spent 26 years at Goldman Sachs becoming its Co-Chairman from 1990-1992. He also served as Chairman of Citigroup. Along with Goldman Sachs, Rubin funded the Hamilton Project embedded in the Brookings Institution. In other words, he embedded within what is perceived as a liberal think tank a Trojan Horse that espouses cutbacks in entitlements (but not Defense budgets), more NAFTA like agreements, outsourcing of jobs overseas and strict budget consciousness applied to health care. Rubin used the same tactic with Barack Obama: choosing an essentially ambitious yet cautious conservative and turning him into a Trojan Horse for his causes and those of Goldman’s/the Hamilton Project’s. Rubin is the de facto President of the United States and he and the Hamilton Project tell Obama and his administration what to do. Obama gets to ride on Air Force One.

According to a recent Politico article:

Behind the scenes, Rubin still wields enormous influence in Barack Obama’s Washington, chatting regularly with a legion of former employees who dominate the ranks of the young administration’s policy team. He speaks regularly to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, who once worked for Rubin at Treasury.

SPERLING, GENE.

Prior to advising Timothy Geithner on bailouts, Sperling was paid the paltry sum of $887,727 by Goldman Sachs for one year of consulting work. Sperling, another acolyte of Robert Rubin’s raked in even more that year, according to William Grieder at the Nation:

[he was paid in addition] $480,051 as a director of the Philadelphia Stock Exchange, plus $250,000 for his quarterly briefings to two hedge funds, plus the speaking gigs [$158,000] (including an appearance before the Stanford Group in Houston subsequently charged with running a Ponzi scheme). Meantime, his day job at the Council on Foreign Relations paid $116,653. A busy, busy wonk.

STORCH, ADAM.

Storch worked for Goldman Sachs for 5 years reaching the position of Vice President in the Business Intelligence Group. He is Obama’s Managing Executive of the Security and Exchange Commission’s Division of Enforcement.

SUMMERS, LARRY.

It didn’t take Larry Summers long to land a big time job after he crashed and burned as Harvard’s President. He sits at Obama’s right hand as Obama’s chief economic adviser and head of the National Economic Counsel. Summers’s boss at Goldman was non other than Robert Rubin, former co-Chairman of Goldman and also former head of Citicorp.

Summers has reaped nearly $2.8 million in speaking fees to banks and institutions he is now supposed to be helping to regulate and oversee.

Goldman Sachs paid him $135,000 for a single speech he gave in April, 2008, a very good investment repaid many times to Goldman.

>CONCLUSION.

Although a lot of work and research was put into this list, I am sure I missed many people. But it gives the most comprehensive look ever published at how extensive the Goldman Sachs ties are in the Obama administration and the revolving door between the two (See attorney Craig’s description above).

It also shines light on a subject that has virtually received no mainstream media attention: the importance of the Hamilton Project (funded by Robert Rubin and Goldman Sachs) as the policy voice for their pro-corporate interests. While Matt Taibbi has dissected Goldman, no journalist has looked at the Hamilton Project (Taibbi misses it too) despite the fact that all three of its first directors serve now in the Obama administration. Its current director, its fourth, worked as an economic adviser to Obama Administration and at MIT. It formulate the pro-big business that Goldman wants and spreads it through academia and the Obama administration.

Robert Rubin and Goldman Sachs cleverly disguished their Rosemary’s baby, the Hamilton Project, within the essentially liberal Brookings Institution. Lots of journalists (including the BBC) have been misled by this, thinking that if it comes out of Brookings, it must be liberal or even progressive. Discussing Peter Orszag, the BBC made this blunder:

He was one of the first directors of the Hamilton Project, a Brookings think tank initiative backed by Robert Rubin which aimed to combine fiscal responsibility with progressive politics.

(emphasis added)

Not so! The clear message from the Hamilton Project is this:

1) entitlements must be cut, including Social Security;
2) more jobs must be outsourced overseas;
3) more NAFTA-type agreements must be drafted and entered into;
4) strict budgetary policies must be applied to entitlements and especially health care "reform" (whereas the defense department is skirted).

One only has to look at the Hamilton Project, at Obama’s speech to that group in April, 2006, and the numerous articles and books that they have peddled to see that their outlook is overwhelmingly corporatist and pro-big business. It is, then, ant-iprogressive not liberal and certainly not progressive.

RECOMMENDED FURTHER READING:

1. Greg Gordon (McClatchy Newspapers), "Goldman’s White House Connections Raise Eyebrows" April 21, 2010.

2. Fflambeau, "With the Obama Administration Infested With Goldman Sachs People, How Real is the Obama/Democratic Attack on Big Banks" FDL Diary, April 21, 2010.

3. "More Investigations of Goldman Sachs, A Double-Edge Swords for Obama and Democrats"

4. "Meet Robert Rubin" at MyOpera/Personal Finance Blog

5. Paul Street’s article showing that Obama held corporatist ideas long before elected and his indebtedness to the interests of big business.

6. Matthew Skomarovsky, "Obama Packs Debt Commission with Social Security Looters", March 28, 2010 at Alternet.

ESSENTIAL READING ON THE HAMILTON PROJECT AND ITS TIES TO THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION:

1. Kirk James Murphy, M.D. "The Hamilton Project: Same Corporatist Whine In New DLC Vessels." THE seminal article on the Hamilton Project which also features a video clip of then Senator Barack Obama talking about "my friend, Bob [Rubin]" and espousing cuts in entitlements and the "need" for more free trade pacts like NAFTA.

2. Fflambeau, "Obama’s ‘Smoking Gun’: His Hamilton Project Speech Shows His Links to Goldman, Entitlement Cuts, Part 1.

3. Fflambeau, "Obama’s ‘Smoking Gun’: His Hamilton Project Speech Shows His Links to Goldman, Entitlement Cuts, Part 2".

4. Another source for Obama’s Hamilton Project speech of April 2006. Contains video clip.

5. James Kirk Murphy, M.D., "Remember the Hamilton Project?" Dr. Murph’s latest look at the Hamilton Project.

6. David Sirota, "Wall Street Democrats Unveil Plan to Undermine Progessives", April 5, 2006.

The Rothschild Dynasty Pt. 2 – Economic Violence

2011-05-17T09:45:00.000-07:00

HOTT
May 17, 2011

Part 2 – ECONOMIC VIOLENCE

By: Lord Stevens of Todd

& Baron Von Andrew de Koresh

The doctrine of Rothschild is quite clear and was written about long before appearing in Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars, under the heading: Mr. Rothschild’s Energy Discovery. In this economic / political concept, the main principle is as such:

“When you assume the appearance of power, people soon give it to you”[i]

Through their experience with currency and deposit loan accounts, the Rothschild’s learned that they could INDUCE PEOPLE to give up their real wealth in trade for the prospect of potentially gaining more wealth. This is the basic principle behind the now common “pyramid scheme”, and is the same basic principle in global finance.

Because of the special situation that the Rothschild family found themselves in during the 19^th century, they were able to either print or not print the needed capital to fund Europe. Rothschild controlled the quantity of currency in the system, and thus Rothschild was in control of the system. This was one of the first fractional reserve systems to be brought forth in the later centuries of written history and would forever change the world.

ALBERT PIKE & 3 WORLD WARS

In 1871 an American General named Albert Pike wrote out his military blueprint for the coming of three world wars and the culmination of this conspiracy of its final stages to be played out. Albert Pike was famously inducted into the Illuminati by Giuseppe Mazzini. Giuseppe Mazzini is also known as the founder of the Italian Mafia. Albert Pike, ardent racist and socio path, was a 33^rd degree mason of the Scottish Rite, and is alleged to be the founder of the KKK. Amazingly there is a statue of this man in Washington D.C.

On August 15th of this year, 1871, Albert Pike writes a letter (now catalogued in the British Museum) to Guiseppe Mazzini, in which he states the following,

This is Pikes Three World War Plan:

“The First World War must be brought about in order to permit the Illuminati to overthrow the power of the Czars in Russia and of making that country a fortress of atheistic Communism. The divergences caused by the “agentur” (agents) of the Illuminati between the British and Germanic Empires will be used to foment this war. At the end of the war, Communism will be built and used in order to destroy the other governments and in order to weaken the religions.” ²

Students of history will recognize that the political alliances of England on one side and Germany on the other, forged between 1871 and 1898 by Otto von Bismarck, co-conspirator of Albert Pike, were instrumental in bringing about the First World War.

“The Second World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences between the Fascists and the political Zionists. This war must be brought about so that Nazism is destroyed and that the political Zionism be strong enough to institute a sovereign state of Israel in Palestine. During the Second World War, International Communism must become strong enough in order to balance Christendom, which would be then restrained and held in check until the time when we would need it for the final social cataclysm.” ³

After this Second World War, Communism was made strong enough to begin taking over weaker governments. In 1945, at the Potsdam Conference between Truman, Churchill, and Stalin, a large portion of Europe was simply handed over to Russia, and on the other side of the world, the aftermath of the war with Japan helped to sweep the tide of Communism into China.

(Readers who argue that the terms Nazism and Zionism were not known in 1871 should remember that the Illuminati invented both these movements. In addition, Communism as an ideology, and as a coined phrase, originates in France during the Revolution. In 1785, Restif coined the phrase four years before revolution broke out. Restif and Babeuf, in turn, were influenced by Rousseau – as was the most famous conspirator of them all, Adam Weishaupt.)

“The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the “agentur” of the “Illuminati” between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other. Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion…”

Since the terrorist attacks of Sept 11, 2001, world events, and in particular in the Middle East, show a growing unrest and instability between Modern Zionism and the Arabic World. This is completely in line with the call for a Third World War to be fought between the two, and their allies on both sides. This Third World War is still to come, and recent events show us that it is not far off.[i]

“…We shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view. This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time.” ⁴

Some of Pikes most famous and telling words of his spiritual belief come from the book Morals and Dogma, were he states who he, high degree freemasons, Rothschild’s and other societies and secretive subverter’s truly follows:

“LUCIFER, the Light-bearer! Strange and mysterious name to give to the Spirit of Darkness! Lucifer, the Son of the Morning! Is it he who bears the Light, and with its splendors intolerable blinds feeble, sensual or selfish Souls? Doubt it not!”

ROTHSCHILD PLANS – IN EFFECT

Following a brief training period in the Rothschild’s London Bank, Jacob Schiff, a Rothschild, born in their house in Frankfurt, arrives in America at the age of 18, with instructions and the finance necessary to buy into a banking house there. The purpose of this was to carry out the following tasks.

Gain control of America’s money system through the establishment of a central bank.
Find desirable men, who for a price, would be willing to serve as stooges for the Illuminati and promote them into high places in the federal government, the Congress, Supreme Court, and all the federal agencies.
Create minority group strife throughout the nations, particularly targeting the whites and blacks.
Create a movement to destroy religion in the United States, with Christianity as the main target.

In 1868 Baron Jacob Mayer Rothschild dies, shortly after purchasing Château Lafite, one of the four great premier grand cru estates of France. He is the last of Mayer Amschel Rothschild’s sons to die.[i]

In 1870 Nathaniel de Rothschild dies.

In 1872 just before Giuseppe Mazzini’s death he makes another revolutionary Adrian Lemmy his successor. Lemmy would help to start the revolutionary mentality that would be followed by Lenin, Trotsky, and then Stalin all of which are backed and financed by the Rothschild’s.

In 1873 the Rio Tinto copper mines are bought by foreign financiers along with the Rothschild’s; these are the largest copper mines in Europe. These mines and the Rio Tinto group have grown since and the company has grown through a long series of mergers and acquisitions to place itself among the world leaders in the production of many commodities, including aluminum, iron ore, copper, uranium, coal, and diamonds.^[3] Although primarily focused on extraction of minerals, Rio Tinto also has significant operations in refining, particularly for refining bauxite and iron ore.^[4] The company has operations on six continents but is mainly concentrated in Australia and Canada, and owns gross assets valued at $81 billion through a complex web of wholly and partly owned subsidiaries.[ii] The Rio Tinto group is also an adamant supporter of sustainable development although they are one of the largest mining and energy users on the planet. They are also the sole provider for the metals in the 2012 London Olympic Games. (http://www.riotinto.com/)

In the year 1875 the Rothschild’s would be extremely busy. On January 1^st of this year Jacob Schiff, now Solomon Loeb’s son-in-law after marrying his daughter Teresa takes control of the banking house, Kuhn, Loeb, & Co. If you remember Jacob Schiff grew up in the Rothschild house in Frankfurt, Germany and Solomon Loeb father migrated from Germany after working as a small corn and wine deal out of the land owned by the Grand duchy of Hesse from the Hesse dynasty.[iii] Solomon Loeb’s other daughter Nina would also go on to marry Paul Warburg. After Jacob Schiff gains control of Kuhn, Loeb, & Co. he would go on to finance John D. Rockefeller’s Standard Oil Company, Edward R. Harriman’s Railroad Empire, and Andrew Carnegie’s Steel Empire, all of which the finances would come from the Rothschild’s money.

They would help to fund the first channel tunnel from France to England through the finances from the Rothschild owned Compagnie du Chemin de Fer du Nord.

The Rothschild’s would then provide Minister Benjamin Disraeli the finance for the British government to acquire a major stake in the Suez Canal.

Around this time J.P. Morgan would be taking over his father Junius Morgan’s banking company which was passed down through the George Peabody of the London Banking group Peabody & Co. This is where the Morgan Rothschild connection begins:

“George Peabody, a Massachusetts’s trader, set up a banking house – George Peabody & Co. – in London in 1837. He became regarded as a “financial ambassador in London. Carroll Quigley attributes the use of tax-exempt foundations for manipulation of society to Peabody, seen in his Illuminati Peabody foundation. Daniel Colt Gilman, a member of the Skull & Bones and first President of the Carnegie Institution, was involved in the establishment of the Peabody foundation. He was in such high regard by the elite that they have erected a statue of him across from the Bank of England. Peabody was getting old and needed a younger partner. Junius Morgan, of Hartford, Connecticut, was recommended to Peabody. In 1854 Junius and his family arrived in London to join George Peabody & Co. When the elite’s concocted American Civil War broke out, Peabody and Junius Morgan raised loans for the North. It appears Junius played both sides of the war. Ralph Epperson claims Junius was one of the Rothschild agents who shipped supplies to the South. When Peabody retired in 1864 Junius took over the business. The firm was re-named JS. Morgan & Co. That same year Junius’ son, J.P. Morgan, became a junior partner in the firm. A year later J.P. left for America to represent the firm in the New York.”[iv] After this the firm was renamed J.P. Morgan and would later come to be known as J.P. Morgan/Chase.

Seeing the destruction that was being rot on the United States through the monopolization and centralization of financial and mineral wealth Otto Von Bismarck would state:

“The division of the United States into two federations of equal force was decided long before the civil war by the high financial power of Europe. These bankers were afraid that the United States, if they remained in one block and as one nation, would attain economical and financial independence, which would upset their financial domination over the world. The voice of the Rothschild’s predominated. They foresaw the tremendous booty if they could substitute two feeble democracies, indebted to the financiers, to the vigorous Republic, confident and self-providing. Therefore they started their emissaries in order to exploit the question of slavery and thus dig an abyss between the two parts of the Republic.”

In 1881 James A. Garfield, two weeks before his assassination after being in office 100 days would state:” Whoever controls the volume of money in our country is absolute master of all industry and commerce…and when you realize that the entire system is very easily controlled, one way or another, by a few powerful men at the top, you will not have to be told how periods of inflation and depression originate.”

In 1883 the channel being build to go from Britain to France stops after 6,000 feet of excavation. The reason being that the British government felt it was a threat to national security.

In 1885 Nathaniel Rothschild becomes the first Jewish peer in British parliament and takes on the title of Lord.

In1887 the Rothschild’s fund the amalgamation of the Kimberly diamond mines in South Africa and become the biggest shareholders in the company De Beers which mines precious medals in Africa and India.

In 1891 growing tensions arise between Rothschild’s and the British Labour Leaders causing them to state: “This blood-sucking crew has been the cause of untold mischief and misery in Europe during the present century, and has piled up its prodigious wealth chiefly through fomenting wars between States which ought never to have quarreled.

Whenever there is trouble in Europe, wherever rumors of war circulate and men’s minds are distraught with fear of change and calamity you may be sure that a hook-nosed Rothschild is at his games somewhere near the region of the disturbance.”[v] The Rothschild’s would soon after buy up the media outlet Reuters and begin curbing any descent among the masses.

BEAUTY AND THE BEAST

In the 19^th century, the Rothschild’s would gain influence for the Illuminati with another group that wielded as much spiritual and monetary influence around the world as they did; the Vatican. This powerful merger could be one of the most influential business dealings of all time, and may be one of the main reasons why the Rothschild’s hold the high positions in the brotherhood that they do.

It is no secret that the brotherhood has had a troubled history with the Vatican ever since the Knights Templar. Pope Clement 12^th issued Papal Bulls in the 1700’s stating that any Catholic who became a Mason would be excommunicated. These edicts would hold for centuries, but did little to hamper Masonic influence. The mysteries simply operated in secret as they had been ever since their inception. Still, the Order was desperate for a seat in the Vatican, and the Rothschild’s would pave the way for a new, friendly relationship.

This being all the more clear when you remember that the Vatican already had their agents known as The Knights of Malta and the Jesuits working through the pope’s delegation toward World Order. Ultimately, the Mysteries and the Vatican would work together to control banking, politics, the CIA, other intelligence organizations, P2, religion, education, law, etc.[i], culminating with Illuminati pope John Paul 22^nd in 1983, who retracted all of Pope Clements Papal Bulls forbidding Masonic affiliation.

This began modestly. As the Rothschild’s gained financial power in Europe, the Vatican found money hard to resist. Early dealings with the Vatican began around 1830 when:

“Early in the 19th century the Pope came to the Rothschild’s to borrow money. The Rothschild’s were very friendly with the Pope, causing one journalist to sarcastically say ‘Rothschild has kissed the hand of the Pope… Order has been reestablished.’ The Rothschild’s in fact over time were entrusted with the bulk of the Vatican’s wealth.”[ii]

The major turning point in this relationship would come in the form of a “bailout” during what is considered one of the first financial crises in modern history, beginning in 1873. This “bailout” occurred in 1893, and is described in the Jewish encyclopedia as such:

“…the Rothschild’s came to the rescue of their rivals and prevented a universal financial catastrophe. It is a somewhat curious sequel to the attempt to set up a Catholic competitor to the Roth’s-child’s that at the present time the latter are the guardians of the papal treasure.”[iii]

ZIONISM

A few years later, in 1895 Edmond James de Rothschild would visit Palestine and begin supplying funds to start the Jewish colonies. Meanwhile, Theodore Herzl began the book “The Jewish State”, published in 1896. Herzl becomes the public face of political Zionism. The media portrays his story as if he were influenced by the Dreyfus Affair. However, Herzl’s position was already foaming under the breath of many in Europe.

It has been argued that Herzl and Zionists like him were actually more interested in the land of Palestine than in the Jewish people. For example, in Herzl’s diary, he says:

“It is essential that the sufferings of Jews… become worse… this will assist in realization of our plans…I have an excellent idea… I shall induce anti-Semites to liquidate Jewish wealth. . . The anti-Semites will assist us thereby in that they will strengthen the persecution and oppression of Jews. The anti-Semites shall be our best friends”. (Diary of Theodore Herzl, Part I, pp. 16)

In 1897 the first Zionist Congress would be set to convene in Munich Germany, headed by Theodore Herzl, with the financial backing of the Rothschild’s. Because of the open opposition by the Jewish community, it would be moved to Basel, Switzerland.

Theodore Herzl would later become president of the World Zionist Organization. In his diary, he would say this about the Basel meeting:

“Were I to sum up the Basel Congress in a few words — which I shall guard against pronouncing publicly — it would be this: At Basel, I founded the Jewish State. If I said this out loud today, I would be answered by universal laughter. Perhaps in five years, and certainly in fifty, everyone will realize it.” (Diaries of Theodore Herzl, 3 September 1897, 4 days after the beginning of the Basel Congress)

Additional excerpts from p. 68 of Part I of Herzls Diary:

“So anti-Semitism, which is a deeply imbedded force in the subconscious mind of the masses, will not harm the Jews. I actually find it to be advantageous to building the Jewish character, education by the masses that will lead to assimilation. This education can only happen through suffering, and the Jews will adapt.”

Along these same lines, a future Zionist leader, Ben Gurion (the first head of the future Zionist ‘state of Israel’) declared on December 7, 1938:

“If I knew it was possible to save all the children in Germany by taking them to England, and only half of the children by taking them to Eretz Israel, I would choose the second solution. For we must take into account not only the lives of these children but also the history of the people of Israel.” (Yvon Gelbner, “Zionist policy and the fate of European Jewry”, in Yad Vashem studies[(Jerusalem, vol. XII, p. 199]).

Following the formation of the state of Israel, Ben Gurion stated on August 31, 1949:

“Although we have realized our dream of creating a Jewish State, we are only at the beginning. There are still only 900,000 Jews in Israel, whereas the majority of the Jewish people still remains abroad. Our future task is to bring all the Jews to Israel.”

PRELUDE TO WAR

In 1900, the America industrialist Andrew Carnegie was ready to retire, after what is commonly touted as a “rags to riches” story. He had made a phenomenal fortune in the steel industry exporting and building rails to where he was even out-producing European steel. Now that he was one of the “Captains of Industry”, and he was ready to sell Carnegie Steel. This proved to be the Rothschild agent J. P. Morgan, who was hoping to buy up the various American steel companies and integrate them into a single industry. , Although Rothschild banks financed American industrialists such as Andrew Carnegie early on, European Rothschild steel and railroad interests happened to be the only real competition the American steel industry had. The deal was reached on March 3 1901, and U.S. Steel was formed in the largest financial business deal on record at the time.

Andrew Carnegie would receive his payment in 5% interest earning gold bonds, to the tune of 230 million dollars. This phenomenal sum was Carnegie’s share of $480,000,000 in 1901, which was roughly equivalent to 12 times Carnegie Steel’s annual earnings. Carnegie would go on to retire, forming different global think tanks and foundations.

In 1906 the Rothschild’s sell Caspian and Black Sea petroleum supposedly because of increased instability in the region and competition because of Standard oil. Given the fact that the Rothschild’s hold a hand in helping the Standard Oil company and the company they sell Caspian and Black Sea petroleum to is Royal Dutch Shell, which they hold many stocks in (http://www.secinfo.com/d139r2.117f.htm), it seems more likely that this is a transfer of powers to be delegated to families that the Rothschild’s had been working with for a number of years. It would make sense being that at this time the Rothschild family was receiving more press and they wanted to step further back behind the curtain.

In 1907 Jacob Schiff states before the New York Chamber of Commerce: “Unless we have a Central Bank with adequate control of credit resources, this country is going to undergo the most severe and far reaching money panic in its history.”[i] America would soon come to find it self in further financial crisis similar to those that had been fabricated in the passed.

In 1907, Andrew Carnegie famously renewed his commitment to international peace through powerful international government, laws and agencies, saying he was “more drawn to this cause than any”. This started a more fervent push on his part to create a new foundation to further the cause of “peace”. This led to a meeting with himself and the future trustees of what would become the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

The minutes of these early meetings remain a secret to this day. However, foundations have been investigated on a number of occasions in our nation’s history. Most notably, in the Joint Committee on Regional Government – September 26, 1978, Edwardsville, Illinois, the chief investigator, Norman Dodd, gave this testimony of his investigation into the records of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace at their library:

“To make a long story short – as short as possible – a member of my staff was sent to New York and spent two weeks there, and did what they call “spot reading” of the minutes of this organization.

“Now, we are back in the period of 1908, and these minutes reported the following: The Trustees of the Carnegie Endowment bring up a single question; namely, if it is desirable to alter the life of an entire people, is there any means more efficient than war to gain that end? And they discuss this question at a very high academic and scholarly level for a year, and they come up with an answer– there are no known means more efficient than war, assuming the objective is altering the life of an entire people.

“That leads, then, to a question: How do we involve the United States in a war?

“This was in 1909. I doubt if there was any question more removed, or any idea more removed from the minds of us, as a people, at that time than war. There were certain of what we call “intermittent shows” in the Balkans, and I also doubt if very many of us knew, really, where the Balkans was, or their relation or possible effect on us…”

The Carnegie Endowment for International peace was officially set up in 1910 on Carnegie’s birthday, December 14^th, with a fund of $10 million to start with. Carnegie gave his trustees, “the widest discretion as to the measures and policy they shall from time to time adopt” in carrying out the purpose of the fund. Its first president was Elihu Root, winning him the Nobel Prize in 1912. Root was Secretary of War under presidents McKinley and Roosevelt, and was responsible for enlarging West Point, and starting US Army War College and establishing the General Staff.

In 1911 seeing history repeating itself at the detriment of the nation New York Mayor John F. Hylan states: “The real menace of our republic is the invisible government which, like a giant octopus, sprawls its slimy length over our city, state and nation. At the head is a small group of banking houses, generally referred to as international bankers.”

Werner Sombart, in his book The Jews and Modern Capitalism, stated that from 1820 on, it was the, “Age of the Rothschild,” and concluded that there was, “Only one power in Europe, and that is Rothschild.”

In the December 1912 issue of, “Truth,” magazine, George R. Conroy states of banker Jacob Schiff,

“Mr. Schiff is head of the great private banking house of Kuhn, Loeb, and co, which represents the Rothschild’s interests on this side of the Atlantic. He has been described as financial strategist and has been for years the financial minister of the great impersonal power known as Standard Oil. He was hand in glove with the Harriman’s, the Gould’s, and the Rockefellers in all their railroad enterprises and has become the dominant power in the railroad and financial power of America.”

With increasing tensions shrouding the Rothschild’s once again in 1913 they start the Anti Defamation League in America to curb any dissent towards them and label anyone who does so an “anti-Semite” In this same year Woodrow Wilson would sign into law the Federal Reserve Act, giving the power to print money and regulate the quantity of to a privately owned centralized banking system that will stay in power until our current day. With great dismay Congressman Charles Lindbergh states on December 23: “The Act establishes the most gigantic trust on earth. When the President signs this Bill, the invisible government of the monetary power will be legalized…….The greatest crime of the ages is perpetrated by this banking and currency bill.” It is conservatively estimated that the Federal Reserve takes in $150 billion dollars a year.

With the establishment of the Federal Reserve, the American people could finance their inclusion in the war, which gave the go ahead for the Illuminati to take the necessary steps to incite global turmoil. With the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, the dominoes that had been carefully set up through alliances and financial agreements were set in motion. The world escalated quickly, and for seemingly little reason, into WWI.

To help curb dissention in the media further the Rothschild’s gained control in 1914 of the European news agencies Wolff in Germany, Reuters in England, and Havas in France. This helped to stir up the emotional frenzy for war, and protect the Rothschild’s.

THE GREAT WAR

The war came together more or less as planned. At first the Americans were resistant to entering into the war, as had been discussed, but plans were drawn up to sink the passenger ship, Lusitania — carrying 1,195 passengers, over a hundred of which were Americans. This tragic hoax was arranged with the full compliance of Woodrow Wilson, Mandel House, J .P. Morgan (a Rothschild agent) and Winston Churchill. The Americans on board were used by the media to portray the Lusitania as a direct attack on Americans, and all the reason we needed to enter into WWI. Ads such as this one were used to tug American heartstrings:

Even these efforts were not enough to sway public opinion fully, however. That took the publishing of the 1917 Zimmerman telegram and more sunken military ships. Only then was America ready for war.

It was during the turmoil of the war that the February revolution of 1917 occurred, establishing Bolshevik power in Russia. The Tsar and his family would remain under house arrest for a year. In 1918, the Rothschild’s would ultimately order the execution of Tsar Nicholas II through the Bolsheviks, which they and the Illuminati controlled. This murder was considered a direct retaliation to Tsar Alexander II, who had helped Abraham Lincoln in 1864 during the American Civil War. These men hold grudges for generations.

WWI would rage until November 1918, traumatizing the known world to consider the need for the League of Nations. As we discussed, this organization was negotiated well before and during the war. In fact, the breakup of the land to the different members was so well decided that Britain was already understood to receive Palestine after the war, and Britain made the decision to in turn give it to Lord Rothschild. The Balfour Declaration:

The fascinating thing about this brazen declaration is that Palestine did not yet belong to Britain, much less Lord Rothschild and his Zionist Federation. This was an illegal “gift”.

The treaty of Versailles was held in 1919, 6 months after the cease fire in 1918. It was at this meeting that German reparations were decided by the Allied powers. Of course, Rothschild banks helped to facilitate all financial exchanges. These reparation payments were deemed excessive by many, especially considering how devastated Germany was.

WWII

There is much that could and has been said about the situations that paved the way for the rise of the Third Reich; Nazi Germany. In light of this very well documented war, we will simply point out some key aspects of this complicated and very influential war. First, as is very well documented, Hitler was brought to power directly by the Thule society in Germany, which was a secret society with direct connections to Freemasonry and the Theosophical society. The work of these three mystery schools in tandem created the media storm that helped bring Hitler to power. Through a series of well orchestrated political moves and closed door deals, President Hindenburg appointed Hitler Chancellor, although the Nazi party held a minority in the Reichstag, and Hitler had lost all elections.

It took the Reichstag building fire for the Nazi party to gain the influence they needed. It is most likely that this fire was actually started by Dutch communist named Marinus van der Lubbe with the full support and guidance of the Nazi party for the sole purpose of framing the Communists. It was in response to this fire that the Nazis were able to convince the Reichstag to suspend the German Constitution, placing Hitler as dictator

The condition of the Socialist state (Nazi means “National Socialist”) is best described in Hitler’s title as “Fuhrer”, or “Father”. Hitler portrayed himself as the Father of the German people, who would bring Germany out of the dark days caused by the Zionist banking cartels and into a “New Age”, where Germany would rule a 1000 years of peace. The German people were being held back from their true greatness. This “New World Order” was touted as the culmination of millennia, and the pure German a “Superman”.

The social control programs that were implemented over Germany were always portrayed as beneficial to the people. They focused on the right of the people to be cared for by the State. Often, this was accomplished by saying programs would “put money back in the economy” and “create jobs”. Any opposition was portrayed as foolish or a “Zionist plot”.

A whole new series of departments and agencies were created to help Germany move forward. Hitler broke from the League of Nations, and started demonizing the banks. This was most effectively accomplished through the portrayal of the Rothschild history, as we have already covered, but many other methods were employed during the pre-war years.

What is not commonly discussed is the fact that Hitler used Rothschild money to help build his empire and fight the war. In addition, it is a common rumor that Hitler’s father was the illegitimate son of maid in Baron Rothschild’s home in Frankfurt, and was raped by him. Allegedly, the family sent her away pregnant. This allegation was made in the thirties by various news outlets and reporters. Whether or not Hitler was a Rothschild is unknown, but at the time he paid these people and family off, rather than risk a scandal.

Meanwhile, Zionism was beginning to make mainstream headway.

Of course, WWII formally began with the invasion of Poland, and once again the Rothschild banks funded both sides of the war. This was done more covertly than in the past, due to the funding and buying out of smaller banks, and various methods of financial secrecy and control. This is not hard to understand. The Rothschild’s literally were the entire financial system in the mid 1800s, and had been buying out their competitors and taking advantage of crises for a hundred years. It was physically impossible for Hitler to get money from anyone other than the Rothschild’s, and that went for the Allies as well. It made no difference who was fighting, or where, or why; the Rothschild’s owned in whole or in part most if not all of the banks in any given country.

WWII came off as a smashing success, and by the time that the Japanese were blown to kingdom come, Hitler and his top officials were all hanging out in South American sun.

In case anyone is unaware of this very well documented fact, Hitler had many doubles, and the stories around his suicide have changed multiple times, and the body found in the ditch was not Hitler’s proper height. Stalin maintained that Hitler was alive for decades. There are multiple photographs and reports of Hitler and others in South America in the decades following the war, and there is extensive documentation of a Nazi program called ODESSA specifically for the purpose of creating escape routes for Nazi officials before the end of WWII. In addition to these glaring signs, there is the fact that literally NONE of the key Nazi leaders were captured or recovered, and many Nazi scientists were secretly brought into the USA and had their identities changed by our own CIA in Project Paperclip. In truth, very few minor officers were ever brought to trial or served time. This is most likely because in truth, the Nazi regime was just another tool of the Illuminati.

IMF / WORLD BANK

Following the end of WWII, the United Nations and their respective financial agencies, the IMF and the World Bank were created. These agencies had already been discussed in the years during the war, similarly to the League of Nations and WWI. There are even news articles dating back to 1941 that discuss the United Nations as a concept by name.

There is, of course, the creation of the state of Israel, and the use of the holocaust to justify this usurpation of the Palestinian people’s land. However, I will leave this to another article, because we are discussing the Rothschild dynasty directly. I will, however, discuss the World Bank, and the IMF. These organizations are owned by N.M. Rothschild and sons completely. It is through these world financial agencies that the power and movements of the Rothschild’s can be most effectively followed and shown.

The creation of the IMF and the World Bank at Bretton Woods was a complete compromise of the sovereignty of the signing nations. Instead of being able to regulate their own currency and its inflation rate, the IMF now had the sole authority to change exchange rates, which were set steadily against the dollar, which had a fixed rate to gold. Dues to the IMF were paid at least %25 in gold, and the IMF in turn gave signing nations the great privilege of letting the IMF control their currency. Allegedly, this was to prevent financial crisis.

On June 4, 1963, President Kennedy issued Executive Order # 11110, ordering congress to issue Silver coin. Less than 6 months later, the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry assassinated Kennedy in Dealey Plaza, which is built like an Illuminati temple of the sun. This assassination served many purposes, not the least of which was to traumatize the American people, and to communicate the message subconsciously not to cross the Illuminati – or else.

The following presidents served World finance concerns dutifully. As America entered into the Vietnam War, we were once again forced to borrow extensively from our Rothschild controlled central bank, the Federal Reserve Corporation. This excessive borrowing culminated with the dollar inflating to the point where the Fed urged Nixon to take America off the Gold standard. This was all part of the “Nixon Shock”, in which he made decisions that ultimately –h0lped the International Bankers he claimed to despise.

The elimination of Bretton Woods one paved the way for a new “free floating exchange rate”, first pioneered by Nathan Rothschild in the 19^th century. “Bretton Woods II”, as it came to be called, was adopted in 1976, touted as the solution to all of the economic woes. By 1980, the free market was promoted to facilitate the move from the first Bretton Woods agreement into the new free-floating exchange rate. The economists claimed that the open market needed to flourish so that each country could compete, and increase the value of their currency. What actually happened was that the whole economic world became dependent on the speculation market as a foundation, and inflated to nothing.

The Rothschild controlled IMF and World Bank has been actively taking over country after country ever since their inception. The IMF requires nations:

“1. To sign secret agreements of 111 items

2. in which they agree to sell off their key assets – water, electric, gas, etc.

3. In which they agree to take economic steps which are really devastating to the nations involved

4. In which they pay off the politicians billions of dollars to Swiss bank accounts to do this transfer of a countries fixed assets”

If these measures aren’t enough to bring a country to its knees, the IMF will attempt to freeze borrowing and trading with that country. If sanctions are still not enough, the target country is almost assured to find itself in a war through some form of coincidence.

There are direct ties between the IMF, World Bank, and financial criminals such as Enron, and Madoff. Even these scandalous individuals are mere fall guys and only minor pieces to the puzzle and power that the international banking cartels run. Much of what empowers the financial hegemony now is mind control through the media and collegiate institutions. Many professional economists know nothing of international finance. Countless other consumers are clueless about how their own Federal Reserve functions.

OUR CURRENT CRISIS

What caused the “sub-prime” mortgage crisis was a series of scandalous decisions on the part of financial institutions dating back to the mid 90s. Most recently, banks started offering high priced loans with high interest rates for little or no credit to people with hardly any money. This targeted a predictable demographic; the lower to middle classes, the very young, and the very old.

As a result, the new customers available for this new type of loan were endless because it opened up the mortgage market to a large segment of the population that had never had that opportunity before. Because the bulk of this group is also poorly educated, all banks had to do was encourage loan officers to hurry people through paperwork, and realtors to only fulfill the necessary requirements for escrow. Once a loan is signed into effect, it is worth its full claim to the beneficiary of that loan. It is as good as property, and can be bought and sold as property.

It is in this manner that the financial crisis forming in the stock market since the 80’s took on a whole new turn. A claim is only worth its full value if it gets paid back someday. If, for any seen or unforeseen reason, a benefactor cannot fulfill the requirements of a loan, that loan is worth in reality only what was paid on it. Oh sure, you can take someone’s house and personal property, but ultimately, we all know you can’t squeeze blood from a turnip. Because of the nature of the “no credit/ no money down” loans employed, most of the benefactors who actually purchased these homes were less than ideal, or “sub-prime”, because they can’t pay, won’t pay, or have no means of paying the loans. Even “prime” cases lost jobs. Also, with house prices dropping in light of the crisis, the real value of the property in question itself often dropped far below the cost of the loan, causing further uncertainty.

By selling these doomed loans to other banks, claim holders redeemed the loan’s full value, turning the imaginary money into cold hard cash. As these “toxic assets” became more common, banks that were buying them started catching on, and refusing to purchase loans without a thorough investigation. In response, claim holders started selling these toxic assets to banks in other countries. This move spread the disease throughout the global market, creating the global storm we saw in 2008. The seemingly endless growth that the financial system had become so accustomed to was showing its colors as a lie based on little more than speculation and greed.

As the revelation started becoming public that these toxic assets were in every bank in the world in an unknown quantity, the market plummeted. It became unknown whether financial institutions had the assets to pay their clients. Panic set in, fearing a run on the banks.

Then, these same financial institutions that created these toxic assets and sold them worldwide making billions, turned around and forced the American taxpayers to purchase them for trillions with what can only be described as a financial gun to the head. Magically, they turned imaginary money created out of nothing into hard earned cash.

More and more I ask myself questions like, “Can they do that?”

Then I can hear him, almost like a ghost, coming from some childhood nightmare saying,

“Yes, We Can.”

Can he sell us toxic loans without our approval?

“Yes, We Can.”

Can they force us to buy crappy medical care we don’t want?

“Yes, We Can.”

Can they enter into war without the full approval of Congress and or the people?

“Yes, We Can!”

Thank you, Obama, for selling us down the river to your financial buddies. Yes, you did.

No, wait, actually you said it best yourself. It’s not “Yes, (YOU) did”, but rather…

NO, THEY CAN’T, ACTUALLY…

As we have seen time and time again, this seems to be a real talent on the part of the Illuminati. It’s not the first time that we have been talked into buying a bunch of worthless nothings for something. Take the Federal Reserve Act, being that we purchased a bunch of fiat money for the full weight of our real gold. Or, take the IMF agreement.

Time and time again, the Rothschild’s have turned up wherever there is some sort of financial crime. Economic violence is the only way to describe it. The complete collapse of an economy, in order to come in and purchase it’s foundation through the remains. It may seem that we have no legal recourse against this family, except for violence or war. I beg to differ, however, and implore all of us to consider our own contract with our Government, the Constitution. This is protected under the sanctity of contract, which all agreements hinge upon. Granted, the Rothschild’s and their comrades in the Illuminati do not hold anything sanctimonious except for that which benefits them. However! It has been shown time and time again that focused, legal, and intentional opposition has succeeded in keeping the Banking Cartels at bay in the past. Yes, each president that has tried has been shot dead, or had an attempt on their life… In response to this fear, I would like to ask the question:

SO WHAT?

These men and the priesthood that brought them to power are evil, but they are still mere men.

Fear God, and what He will say, having known you from creation, if you in any way give in to these men. If you cannot fear God, I implore – Can you live with yourself in the New World Order? Could you sleep at night knowing you complied? Would you trade your children’s freedom for your human comfort? Your “life”? We, the people have the power to stop this LEGALLY and PEACEFULLY, but only if we get started NOW!

It is ALREADY TOO LATE! The protection of the Constitution has already been compromised significantly – but there is still time. You MUST research the Constitution. You MUST do everything you can to hinder the advancement of the propaganda.

SPEAK THE TRUTH – EVEN IF YOUR VOICE SHAKES WITH FEAR!!!!!

We will have to find a way to stop the financial hegemony of the Illuminati ASAP. But we must do so SMARTLY. We can’t just go flailing wildly at the Beast. We may only get one shot to do this right. If we all agree to break a particular law or laws that is/ are unconstitutional at the same time, we can be brought through the court system to justice.

We must figure out what law that will be, and how we will break it in a visible, public way. This is how the unconstitutional Jim Crow laws were overturned. Fearlessly, this will take study, and if we take too long studying, the financial cell doors will slam shut.

I hope this has been a message for you. Please consider our observations. We do have an answer. We, here in this country and in this country only, have a solution that will work. But it will only work, if we work it. We can stop the march toward to Global police state, and we can do it with the tools we already have. You don’t need any money. You don’t need to be a politician. You don’t need to be famous. You only need to be an American, and you can break an unconstitutional law all by yourself, and have it brought to the Supreme Court, and have that law overturned and deemed unconstitutional.

If you do practice “Civil Disobedience”, however, you must first establish that the Supreme Court will decide a case based on Constitutionality. This is why I am referring to a collective civil disobedience, where we can all hold the courts accountable together.

There is a solution, and we have all the answers we need right here, in the mirror.

“Seek the truth, and the truth shall set you free…” – Yeshua, the Messiah

“…and nothing else will!” – William Cooper, American patriot

++++++++++

[1] Cooper, Milton William. Behold A Pale Horse. Flagstaff, AZ: Light Technology Publishing, 1991.

[2] http://www.threeworldwars.com/albert-pike2.htm

[3] Ibid.

[4] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rio_Tinto_Group

[5] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solomon_Loeb

[6] http://behind-the-matrix.blogspot.com/2010/04/jp-morgan-is-rothschild-outllet-why.html

[7] http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/Rothschild-Timeline.shtml

[8] Cooper, Milton William. Behold A Pale Horse. Flagstaff, AZ: Light Technology Publishing, 1991

[9] http://watch.pair.com/mystery-babylon-4.html

[10] http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=445&letter=R&search=ROTHSCHILD

[11] Ibid.

12.) http://www.jewsagainstzionism.com/index.cfm

13.) http://www.zionism-israel.com/

14.) http://www.unitypublishing.com/Government/IMF.htm

Lindsay Lohan: Stalked by freemason?

2011-05-17T09:34:00.000-07:00

TMZ
May 17, 2011

Oft-in-trouble actress Lindsay Lohan has her very own stalker. After getting kicked out of a part at Chateua Marmont this week Lohan was returning to her L.A. home when she discovered a guy hanging outside her window.

Lindsay posted a surveillance video of the man she claims is stalking her, she also says he threatened to kill her via a message left on her personal website.

In a Tweet sent to her fans Lohan states:

“This is the freemason stalker that has been threatening to kill me – while he is TRESPASSING! im actually scared now…All my fans, my supporters, please stand by me.”

According to TMZ.com the man has been leaving Lohan presents for more than four years, drives by her home at all hours of the day and night and even managed to get his hands on Lohan’s phone number, leaving her disturbing voice and text messages.

If that’s not creepy enough for Lohan she will soon be required to wear an ankle monitor and will be forced to stay at home to serve her 120 day sentence. Nothing like having a stalker outside your window when you can’t leave.

No word yet on whether Lohan will file charges, although all signs point to yes

The Rothschild Dynasty Pt.1

2011-05-09T17:50:00.001-07:00

HOTT
May 09, 2011

In the seemingly endless search for the unseen hand, there are many roads of various lengths. Some are dead ends. Some have broken down gates telling you to turn away, only to find an emerald city hidden inside. Who are the controllers of this mystery machine? In the elusive and rarely mentioned elite, there is one name that has prevailed and slipped off the tongue and pen of many researchers. This family name is Rothschild.

Many people have tried to unravel the mysteries of this infamous financial dynasty. The complete control that the Rothschild’s possess over the entire financial market is unquestionable. Their business dealings are notorious. Their influence on Zionism is palpable. Certainly, the Rothschild’s are one of the key members, if not key leaders in the Illuminati, and have had a major influence on the furthering of the “Great Work” (illumination of the soul of man, church, and state – a.k.a.; World Domination).

However, even with the abundance of facts available, finding any even handed research on this family is daunting. One thing we must always take into account when doing any research into topics of this nature is the use of the “Double Mind”. This is a mind control technique, which consists of confusing a subject into two different and contradictory beliefs. This can be done many ways, but most often this is accomplished by muddling a conversation with a flood of unimportant information, and contradictory “facts”. An example of this is creating different versions of the same story, each stressing different facts, or shading the truth with misleading undertones or conclusions. By muddling the conversation in this way, the illuminati can create a veil of confusion to protect their organization and constituents from anyone trying to investigate them.

“LET ME CONTROL A NATIONS CURRENCY, AND I CARE NOT WHO MAKES THE LAWS…”

Although Mayer Rothschild is commonly attributed as saying this, there is absolutely no original source for this information except for Nazi propaganda and specific biographies.

In fact, true as this statement may be, there is an eerily appropriate and older British proverb about propaganda that is often attributed to the philosopher Daniel O’Connell, if not Plato.

“LET ME MAKE THE SONGS OF A NATION, AND I CARE NOT WHO MAKES ITS LAWS…”

Although the Rothschild’s have been truly instrumental in furthering the “Great Work”, the song that is sung of them is only half true. Most often, Rothschild documentaries have a tone that is distinctly antagonistic to Judaism. This is deceptive, because most Jews are just as clueless as everyone else about how we are all used and manipulated. Given, there are some members of the Illuminati who are “Jewish”, but there are just as many if not more who are White. There are many who are Black, Indian, Chinese, etc. Some are men, but some are women. Most are very rich, but some have modest livelihoods in order to further the goals of “the Order”. We must be careful not to name any evil too specifically, for as soon as we do, it will change its mask, even unto our ally. It is always the unexpected gate that is the surer bet for ambush: Murphy’s Law.

It is our intention in this essay to shed some light on the true history of the Rothschild family. This is a rather difficult undertaking, and certainly there is more that could be written than could ever fit in a few short articles. Nevertheless, our goal is to give a synopsis of our research into this extensive topic. Perhaps, we may yet find some harmony the dissonance. Perhaps, there is a harmony in the fact that there IS dissonance.

THE HISTORY OF THE ROTHSCHILD TIMELINE

There is a “fact” list about the Rothschild’s that has been circulating in various forms for generations. This is known as the “Rothschild Timeline”. It has been adapted to suit the needs of each consequential generation, but the basic events of this timeline are generally the same. This consistency is seemingly a sign that these events are for the most part true. However, how well do these events stand up to scrutiny? What are the implications?

Few people know that the Rothschild timeline has it’s origins in Nazi Germany. In order to paint the Jews as the scapegoat for the problems of the German people, the funding by the Rothschild’s of both sides of the war was used as the main example of proof that the Jews rule the world. Of course, the Rothschilds aren’t even Jews religiously, for they are Illuminists. This lie was extremely effective, and many people fell for the Nazi deception through this conceptual avenue. One of the most famous Nazi propaganda films, “Die Rothschild’s Aktien Auf Waterloo” is specifically about Mayer Rothschild’s infamous dealings during he Napoleonic wars. The control of the Rothschild dynasty was an essential element to the Nazi paradigm, and continues to be a way to divert attention off of the real controllers of the matrix (the ancient Illuminati Order), and onto a convenient scapegoat; the Jewish people and religion, which the Illuminati wants eradicated anyway.

However, a major component in Propaganda is the truth. These films use facts that are well documented, and the Rothschild’s are notorious in all generations for a reason. What we must remember when we investigate the Rothschild Timeline, is that the Rothschild’s are just a cog in the machine. Granted, they are key members and leaders in the Great Work. However, the concepts of Illuminism, Satanism, the great work, world government, mind control, slavery, economic manipulation, and secret societies ALL have their roots in the ancient world. The Rothschild’s are only the arms of the part of the Illuminati that they dominate, which is finance and Zionism. No matter how you look at it; ultimately, the Rothschilds are but mere limbs growing from the tree of the Illuminati.

This is proven in the fact the Mayer Amschel Rothschild had to plead for favor with the prominent freemason and Illuminati member, Prince William of Hanue, in 1769 showing that Kings, Queens, Dukes and Duchesses still held power at the whim of the Priesthood:

“In 1769 he wrote a most humble petition to the Prince of Hanau, in which, after referring to various goods The Rise of the House of Rothschild delivered to the prince to his Highness’s most gracious satisfaction, he begged that he might “most graciously

Be granted the advantage of being appointed court agent.” Meyer Amschel promised always to devote all his energy and property to the prince’s service, and he concluded

his letter with a perfectly sincere statement that if he received the designation in question he hoped thereby to gain business esteem and that it would otherwise enables him to make his fortune in the city of Frankfort”[i]

ROTHSCHILD HISTORY

“The House at the Green Sign” in Judengasse ghetto was divided into 2 houses:

- Right Side: “The House of the Ship”

- Left Sidee: “The House of the Red Sign”, the ancestral home of Rothschild

Despite much disinformation available, the “Red Sign” that Mayer Rothschild named himself after was not the Star of David. Although it is considered their symbol, this is mainly because the Rothschild’s (being key Zionists), and are responsible for its use on the Israeli flag. In fact, before their usurpation of the Seal of Solomon, this symbol (also known as Magen David, six-pointed star, Star of David) was “not considered a Jewish symbol before the Rothschild’s began using it.”[i] And was actually reported as being “…used by Arab Magicians, Cabalist Magicians, Druid witches and Satanists…”[ii]

The Rothschild family actually gained their name in the late 16^th century. Their ancestor, Isaak Elchanan, was a Jew of the Judengasse in Frankfurt, Germany. He worked for a major Bank in Frankfurt, dying in 1623. The Judengasse was a street in Frankfurt, which translates to “Jew’s Alley”. All Jews were forced to live there, and there were curfews imposed where Jews had to remain in this area at night and Sundays. The houses in the Judengasse all had designating signs in lieu of modern numbers. Many Jews at this time adopted the names of the sign on their house, and Isaak Elchanan took the name “Roten Schilt” (Red Sign) from the house he lived in at the end of the Judengasse. When his grandson, Naftali Hirz moved from the Judengasse, he took the name with him.

By the mid 1700’s, there were 5 families carrying the name Rothschild in Frankfurt Germany, and they were all involved in finance. The family line that Mayer Amschel Rothschild descended from was the Hinterpfann family (which is also a surname meaning: a tenement in the back of a house at the northern end of the Judengasse[iii]). We should also note that there is much corroboration that the Hinterpfann family also went under the surname “Bauer”, which means “German Farm Worker”. Despite the repetition, we are unable to confirm or deny this claim. The names with the most credibility are Elchanan (being their given name), Roten Schilt (“Red Sign” after the designating sign on their Judengasse house), Hinterpfann (because of the location of the house), and Rothschild, which is what we find them currently under because of Mayer Amschel Rothschild.

Amschel Moses Zer Hinterpfann was the father of Mayer Amschel Zer Hinterpfann, who was later to be known as Mayer Amschel Rothschild. Mayer re-adopted his ancestral name when beginning his banking career in Frankfurt. Amschel Moses Zer Hinterpfann was a moneylender and a proprietor of a counting house in Frankfurt, Germany in 1743.

Amschel Moses’ son, Mayer Amschel Rothschild worked for a bank owned by Oppenheimer’s in Hanover Germany in 1760. After working his way through the bank successfully and becoming junior partner he would come to know General von Estroff who is attached to the court of Prince William of Hanoe. “Prince William of Hesse-Hanau was tied into the Illuminati. He was the son of Landgrave Frederick or Hesse-Cassel, of the royal family of Hesse.

Prince William was a prominent Freemason, and his younger brother Karl, was ‘accepted as the head of all German Freemasons.”[iv], according to “JEWS AND FREEMASONS IN EUROPE, 1723-1939”. After Rothschild changed his name he would go back and become re-acquainted with Estroff under the pretext of selling discount rare coins and trinkets to William of Hanoe. Mayer would gain much favor with William of Hanoe, and in 1769 “Mayer Amschel Rothschild is given permission by Prince William to hang a sign on the front of his business premises declaring that he is, ‘M. A. Rothschild, by appointment court factor to his serene highness, Prince William of Hanau.”[v] As Rothschild gains this pull with the Hanue-Hesse-Cassel royal families, he moves closer into the inner circle that was already making headway through their agent Adam Weishaupt in the Illuminati.

The Illuminati would be the indoctrination and organizing wing that would bring about great upheavals and revolutions in Europe. In 1784 the order would go out through Adam Weishaupt in book form to Maximilien Robespierre. This book was written by one of Weishaupt’s associates, Xavier Zwack, and sent by courier from Frankfurt to Paris. The courier would be struck by lightening and the book would be captured by the locals of Bavaria. Despite ensuing legislation by the Bavarian government ordering the disbandment of the Illuminati, their influence only grew. Infamously, the Illuminati would incite the French Revolution, establishing “a new constitution and passed laws that forbade the Roman Church from levying tithes (taxes) and also removed its exemption from taxation.”[vi] At the time, this was a bankers dream.

Previously, in 1770, Mayer Amschel Rothschild had married a woman named Gutele Schnaper. Mayer and Gutele had five daughters and five sons. The sons were well-tutored in the ‘family business’ and “were imbued with the same spirit of cunning and conquest.” Ultimately, Mayer’s sons established or were positioned in banks in key European locations: Amschel Mayer (1773-1855) in Frankfort, Salomon Mayer (1774-1855) in Vienna, James Mayer (1792-1868) in Paris, Kalmann Mayer (1788-1855) in Naples and Nathan Mayer (1777-1836), the most gifted, in London, where he founded the Rothschild banking dynasty. Nathan created a system of world-wide debits and credits and a new technique for “floating international loans.” ^[9] Kalmann (Karl) became head of the occult group, the Alta Vendita.[vii]

ROTHSCHILDS & the FIRST BANK OF THE USA

In 1791 the Rothschild’s through their agent Alexander Hamilton in George Washington’s cabinet would be successful in getting the First Bank of the United States to help pay off the debt that was incurred during the war. This bank would be run through the Rothschild’s.[viii] In 1792 Jacob (James) Mayer Rothschild was born. Then in 1796 Amschel Mayer Rothschild marries Eva Hanau.[ix] This would finally tie the Rothschild’s family in blood to the royal family of the Hanue, Hesse, and Cassell. In “1789 Nathan Mayer Rothschild leaves Frankfurt for Manchester, England, where with the help of his father and brothers he exports English textiles to Europe.”[x] Then in 1800 Salomon Mayer Rothschild marries Caroline Stern.

The charter for the First Bank of the United States would ultimately run out without renewal from congress, with much credit given to Andrew Jackson. At the Philadelphia Committee of Citizens, Andrew Jackson is famously recorded to have said:

“I too have been a close observer of the doings of the Bank of the United States. I have had men watching you for a long time, and am convinced that you have used the funds of the bank to speculate in the breadstuffs of the country. When you won, you divided the profits amongst you, and when you lost, you charged it to the Bank. You tell me that if I take the deposits from the Bank and annul its charter I shall ruin ten thousand families. That may be true, gentlemen, but that is your sin! Should I let you go on, you will ruin fifty thousand families, and that would be my sin! You are a den of vipers and thieves. I have determined to rout you out and, by the Eternal, (bringing his fist down on the table) I will rout you out!”

-(Stan V. Henkels, “Andrew Jackson and the Bank of the United States”, 1928)

The United States would not renew the charter, which would then spark the War of 1812 with the British. Again, the Rothschild banking cartel directly financed this war. It seemed that the goal of the Illuminati was to put the United States in to so much debt that they would have no choice but to except a centralized Bank of the United States, owned by the Rothschild’s, of course.

Back in Europe Mayer Amschel Rothschild would die on September 19, 1812, and leave specific rules to be followed by the family in their family and personal endeavors. They were only to allow the male members of the family to run the businesses, they were to intermarry with their first cousins to preserve the family’s wealth, take no legal action regarding their wealth and keep their estate hidden from the public. There family would spread out not only through the name of Rothschild but they would also build agents through the children of their daughters to carry on their work. At the death of Mayer Amschel the family would vote in Nathan Mayer Rothschild as the head of the family business.

NAPOLEONIC WARS

In 1799, Napoleon claimed that he wanted to create a Jewish state in Palestine in a Letter “TO THE RIGHTFUL HEIRS OF PALESTINE”, calling all Jews to their homeland.

In 1806 Napoleon Bonaparte states that his “object to remove the house of Hess-Cassel from ruler ship and to strike it out of the list of powers.” On hearing this, Prince William of Hanau, flees Germany, goes to Denmark and entrusts his fortune valued at $3,000,000 at that time to Mayer Amschel Rothschild for safekeeping.[xi]

Nathan Mayer Rothschild married Hannah Barent Cohen the daughter of a wealthy London merchant and begins to move his business to London. In 1808 Nathan Rothschild has his firstborn son Lionel Nathan de Rothschild. Because of the blockades coming up from the war the Nathan Mayer Rothschild went to new street London and set himself up as a banker. In 1810 Sir Francis Baring and Abraham Goldsmid died leaving Nathan Mayer Rothschild as the remaining major banker in England.

In France Jacob Rothschild would go and set up the bank named de Rothschild Frères in Paris. The $3,000,000 that was given to Mayer Amschel Rothschild from Prince William of Hanue was taken and invested in gold through the East-India company which he made no less then four times the profit on the paper money that he bought for 50 cents on the dollar.[xii] The five Rothschild brothers would take this profit and begin to fund both sides of the English and French war. In England Nathan Rothschild would fund the Wellington army and through the bank in France Jacob Rothschild would fund the French army.

The Rothschild’s family had banks set up all over Europe which allowed them to set up fast underground and above ground courier systems to help fund the war. In fact these systems of couriers were the only ones allowed to pass through during the war. This gave Nathan Rothschild a leg up on the information regarding the war. Also through this information they were smuggling goods and arms to both sides across the borders.

Nathan famously smuggled English goods past the French blockade during the Napoleonic conflict. This required an agent in France, so Mayer got his son James a passport to live in Paris.[xiii] As they were smuggling and helping both the British and French the Rothschild’s were also working in secret along the border of Spain and France to move supplies across the border well at the same time holding up Spain financially. Through Nathan Rothschild’s connections in the treasury of Britain he learned that the Duke of Wellington had troops on the border of Spain but they did not have enough hard currency to fund themselves. The army’s financiers would not take paper currency but the government was short on gold at the time. The East Indian trading company had gold at the time that the government wanted to buy but they were waiting for the price to drop to do so. In comes Nathan Rothschild, he buys up much of the gold and continues to raise the price. Seeing that the price was not going to fall the government was force to by the gold at a higher price and Nathan makes out with yet another profit on the war. This scheme did not stop there he turned right back around and offered to transport the gold through France to Wellington. Being the only people who could freely cross the border they were forced to use him. Nathan Rothschild would later describe that this was some of the best business that he had ever done.[xiv]

However good the smuggling trade was for the Rothschild family, their most infamous grab for economic power would come at the very end of the conflict. Through their extensive information networks, the Rothschild’s had a courier inform them that Napoleon had lost Waterloo a full 24 hours ahead of the crown. This famously provided them with a significant advantage, and they spread the rumor that Napoleon had lost the war. This rumor spread like wildfire, and the stock market plummeted. Nathan and his brothers instructed all of their men to purchase every piece of stock and every business and bank that they could. When the news finally came that Napoleon had lost, stock skyrocketed, and the Rothschild’s made a 40% profit overnight on an already unfathomable fortune. The precise value of this fortune became a family secret from this point on, but needless to say it has enabled them to be the backbone of the European financial markets, and provided them with the capital to finance and purchase countries.

With the Rothschild family now being in complete control of Europe financially, they began moving out paper debt and loan systems across their many banks. The fiat money systems that their banks began to encourage has been the mode of operations for the Rothschild financial control machine ever since.

AFTER THE WARS

In 1816 the War in the United States between the British and the U.S. would be winding down because of fatigue both financially and physically. This would cause the U.S. once again to adopt the centralized banking system that the Rothschild’s had wanted. The Second Bank of the United States was chartered in 1816, being built on the bloodshed of war, and the deaths of many, many thousand British and American people.

In addition to this Illuminati victory, in 1818 the French had to secure loans through Rothschild banks to rebuild after being defeated at Waterloo. Agents’ working for the Rothschild’s bought up French government bonds only to turn around and dump them on the market causing France to go into a financial panic. The Rothschild’s then stepped in to save the day, as they have a habit of doing, and took control of the French money system. They then turned around to give £5,000,000 to the Prussian government.

A few years later, in 1822, the Austrian government would honor the Rothschild’s by giving them the title of “Barons”, but Nathan Mayer Rothschild would not accept it. In 1827 Sir Walter Scott would write a book describing Napoleons life, in which he described the fact that Adam Weishaupt through the Illuminati had started the French Revolution and the Rothschild bankers had funded the entire thing.

Back in America, Andrew Jackson became president in 1829. President Jackson would immediately begin to get America out of the Second National Bank charter, and move the U.S. money supply back constitutionally into the people’s hands. In 1835 there was an assassination attempt on him and he would claim to know exactly who had done it. Jackson claimed it was the Rothschild banking cartel. Finally in 1837 Andrew Jackson would successfully throw the central banking system out of the U.S. after years of fighting and there would be none put back in place until the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 where the Rothschild banking cartel would once again come back into play in the U.S.

Andrew Jackson died in 1847 and left on his headstone:

“I KILLED THE BANKS”

Also in 1847 Baron James de Rothschild wins a contract to build the first major railway line across the country of France. The Chemin De Fer Du Nord ran from Paris to Valenciennes and joined up with the Austrian rail network built by his brother Salomon Mayer Rothschild. In that same year the inbreeding continued and Lionel De Rothschild married the daughter of his uncle, Kalmann Mayer Rothschild. A requirement for entering parliament was to take an oath in the true faith of a Christian. Lionel De Rothschild refused to swear on the bible under any circumstances, and his seat in parliament remained empty for 11 years.[xv] In 1858, the rules changed and each House could decide their own oath. In light of this Lionel de Rothschild can finally be sworn in, and he is formally elected to the parliamentary seat for the City of London, and is the first Jew ever sworn in.

AMERICAN CIVIL WAR

In 1848, Amschel Mayer Rothschild’s wife, Eva Hanau, died. The following year, Gutele Schnaper, Mayer Amschel Rothschild’s wife also died. Before her death she would state,

“If my sons did not want wars, there would be none.”[xvi]

Throughout this entire time the Rothschild’s were buying up debt, pioneering railroad systems, funding revolutions, and interbreeding, all the while keeping ownership of all of the banking systems strictly within the family as Mayer had asked for in his will.

Back in the United States in the mid 19^th century there was debate going on between the north and south. There were multiple issues going on over differences in economic and social issues, states/federal rights, slave labor and the abolition movement. However, there were also instigators waiting for any reason to get their hands back into the U.S. economy and government.

Only thirty years prior to the Civil War the central banking system had been challenged and moved back into its place, much to the dismay of the Rothschild’s. In light of this, there was most certainly tension still brewing within Britain over two military defeats in less then a century. In truth, Britain did not want to let us go so easily. It was expensive. Leading up to the Civil War, the Rothschild banks can be seen funding both sides of the war, once again:

“…August Belmont came to the U.S. during the Panic of 1837. August Belmont appears to have been a Rothschild proxy. Belmont bought up government bonds in this Panic and his success eventually led him to the White House where he became the “financial advisor to the President of the United States”. His policies helped pit the North against the South for the Civil War. Judah P. Benjamin, who according to A. Ralph Epperson was the Civil War campaign strategist for the House of Rothschild held many key positions in the Confederacy. He was apparently connected to John Wilkes Booth. J.P. Morgan has been called a Rothschild agent.”[xvii]

With tensions growing, the Rothschild’s and their agents made a move. In 1860:

“…the Southern states swarmed with British agents. These conspired with local politicians to work against the best interests of the United States. Their carefully sown and nurtured propaganda developed into open rebellion and resulted in the secession of South Carolina on December 29, 1860.”[xviii]

Similar events would follow along with real tension within the nation until in 1861; Abraham Lincoln was inaugurated as President. Lincoln orders the blockage of the Southern ports to cut off supplies pouring in from Europe. On April 12, 1861 the Civil War officially began with the attack of Fort Sumner, but tensions and movement had been growing for years beforehand.

“In December, 1861, large numbers of European Troops (British, French and Spanish) poured into Mexico in defiance of the Monroe Doctrine. This, together with widespread European aid to the Confederacy strongly indicated that the Crown was preparing to enter the war. The outlook for the North, and the future of the Union, was bleak indeed.”[xix]

With growing debt mounting in late 1861 Lincoln was forced to go to the banks of New York that were highly influenced by the Rothschild’s to receive loans. With an interest rate set at 24%-36%, there was no way for Lincoln to accept their offer, and much to his credit he came up with an alternative. In his anger and frustration with the high rate of interest, Abraham Lincoln began printing legal currency for all debts private and public.

By April of 1862, $449,338,902 worth of Lincoln’s debt free money known as “Greenbacks” had been printed and distributed throughout the US. Lincoln stated of this:

“We gave the people of this republic the greatest blessing they ever had, their own paper money to pay their own debts.”

That same year The Times of London publishes a story containing the following statement:

“If that mischievous financial policy, which had its origin in the North American Republic, should become indurate down to a fixture, then that government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off debts and be without a debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry on its commerce.

“It will become prosperous beyond precedent in the history of civilized governments of the world. The brains and the wealth of all countries will go to North America. That government must be destroyed or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe.”[xx]

In 1863 Abraham Lincoln discovers that Tsar Alexander 2^nd of Russia had similar problems with the Rothschild’s and their banking schemes, trying to set up a “centralized bank”. With common ground found among them, Tsar Alexander 2^nd issued an order to Britain and France that if country actively intervened in the war he would consider it a declaration of war and take the side of Lincoln. He sent fleets over to the U.S. and they docked in the ports of New York and San Francisco.

In 1864 Rothschild agent August Belmont would support democratic candidate George McCellan, but much to Belmont’s anger Lincoln would win.

In a statement made to Congress early 1865, President Abraham Lincoln candidly stated:

“I have two great enemies, the Southern Army in front of me, and the financial institutions in the rear. Of the two, the one in my rear is my greatest foe.”

Later that year, on April 14, 1865, President Lincoln was assassinated, less than two months before the end of the American Civil War…

….

In part 2, we will continue this discussion of the TRUE Rothschild timeline.

“The truth, (and only the truth,) shall set us free…”

————————————————

[i] http://www.hollings.net/Content/Corti-TheRiseOfTheHouseOfRothschild.pdf[i] http://oneheartbooks.com/resources/ebooks/bloodlines_of_illuminati.pdf

[ii] http://oneheartbooks.com/resources/ebooks/bloodlines_of_illuminati.pdf

[iii] http://www.rothschildarchive.org/ib/?doc=/ib/articles/data_faq_redshield

[iv] Ibid

[v] http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/Rothschild-Timeline.shtml

[vi] http://www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmith_Rothschild.htm

[vii] http://www.spingola.com/before_rockefeller.htm

[viii] http://www.spingola.com/before_rockefeller.htm

[ix] http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/Rothschild-Timeline.shtml

[x] Ibid.

[xi] Ibid.

[xii] Ibid

[xiii] http://oneheartbooks.com/resources/ebooks/bloodlines_of_illuminati.pdf

[xiv] Ibid.

[xv] http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/Rothschild-Timeline.shtml

[xvi] Ibid.

[xvii] http://oneheartbooks.com/resources/ebooks/bloodlines_of_illuminati.pdf

[xviii] http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/slavery.htm

[xix] Ibid

[xx] http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/Rothschild-Timeline.shtml

Usama Bin Laden Dead

2011-05-01T20:11:00.000-07:00

AP
May 1, 2011

Editors Note: This is old news, but to those who believe this just happened....

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Osama bin Laden, is dead, and the U.S. is in possession of his body, a person familiar with the situation said late Sunday.

President Barack Obama was expected to address the nation on the developments Sunday night.

It was unclear where how bin Laden was killed and how the U.S. captured his body. Officials have long believed bin Laden, the most wanted man in the world, was hiding a mountainous region along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border.

The person spoke on the condition of anonymity in order to speak ahead of the president.

In addition:

Frost over the World - Benazir Bhutto - 02 Nov 07

Commodities	Price Function	Total Sales
alcoholic beverages	A	_A
beef	B	_B
coffee	C	_C
gasoline	G	_G
sugar	S	_S
tobacco	T	_T
unknown balance	U	_U

X₁ = G	Y₁ = P - K_P
X₂ = B	Y₂ = F - K_F
X₃ = etc.	Y₃ = etc.

Patriot News Network

Call your elected officials.

Not only are soy products not good for you—they’re wrecking endocrine health.

Air Force dumped ashes of more troops’ remains in Va. landfill than acknowledged

Documents: ATF used "Fast and Furious" to make the case for gun regulations

Amid Sheriff’s Warning, Fed Investigation of IN Dairy Farmer Pulled

Is Defense Authorization Act Treasonous?

$80,000 USAFA Pagan Ritual Site Up and Running

FAQ: Will Your ISP Protect Your Privacy?

Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars

Table of Contents

Industry Equivalent Circuits

Stages of Schematic Simplification

Generalization

Final Bill of Goods

The Technical Coefficients

Types of Admittances

The Household Industry

Household Models

Economic Shock Testing

Introduction to the Theory of Economic Shock Testing

Example of Shock Testing

Introduction to Economic Amplifiers

Short List of Inputs

The Personal Paper Trail

Habit Patterns -- Programming

National Input Information

Short List of Outputs

Table of Strategies

Diversion, the Primary Strategy

Diversion Summary

Consent, the Primary Victory

Amplification Energy Sources

Logistics

The Artificial Womb

The Political Structure of a Nation - Dependency

Action/Offense

Responsibility

Summary

System Analysis

The Draft (As military service)

Enforcement

A HARD look at Alex Jones - Part 7

CONSERVATIVES SHOULD BE WARY OF "SLICK RICK" PERRY!

Eco-Nazi Pt. 3 – Agenda 21, Travel Management and Local Implementation

FEMA'S use of term 'federal family' for government expands under Obama

Eco-Nazi Agenda, Pt.2: Sustainable Communities

Judge: Warrant required for cell phone location data, mentions Orwell's 1984

Eco-Nazi Agenda, Pt.1

List of Goldman Sachs People in the Obama Government

The Rothschild Dynasty Pt. 2 – Economic Violence

Lindsay Lohan: Stalked by freemason?

The Rothschild Dynasty Pt.1

Usama Bin Laden Dead